• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Motive 4.10s vs FRPP 4.10s + Bonus question!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maza4ever14
  • Start date Start date Jun 6, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 6, 2005
#1
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #1
??

i made a post about this but wasnt home for the weekend to see all the posts.

so im set on 4.10s but which should i go for. i was orginally going for the FRPPs but the price was good for the Motives and some people say they are good


also i have an auto 04 GT, what is the correct way to race. all i have been doing is taking the OD and traction control off. some one told me to powerbrake at about 2500 rpm then floor it.

should i start from 1st and at what rpm should i up shift?

ANY INFO WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED!!! thanks in advance
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 6, 2005
#2
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #2
I've heard Motives are just as good as FRPP, but I will be buying FRPP 4.10s when the time is right, my opinion about everything is that something is always cheaper for some reason.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 6, 2005
#3
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • #3
i dont have an auto, but if I were you I would try and PB it to 2K then push down about 3/4 then if it hooks go ahead and nail it...I would start there and the adjust accordingly at the track...and yes O/D off and TC off...but be warned that you will be darn near the top of 3rd in the traps, the bad thing about 4.10s, so if you have a lot of mods planned 4.10s will hurt you as you will have to hit O/D and besides killing your RPMs, its not good to shift into O/D @ WOT from what i hear. Also be warned that your RPMs will be crazy high with the auto, like 3K @ 70 i think LOL. 3.73s should drop that down to around 2600RPMs, its a big difference and I dont know about you but i cant stand driving around at 3K seems like its taching to much.
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 7, 2005
#4
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #4
well it all depends on how you drive, liek if you do a lot of interstate travel and stuff like that. I know a guy with an auto did 4.10s I think and his gas mileage improved a TON
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 7, 2005
#5
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #5
it improved a ton? wow never woulda thought of that.

well i am switchin schools soon so i wont do a lot of highway driving. i mostly use my commuter unless im trying to stunt heading to the city

im mostly going to be doing some city driving
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 7, 2005
#6
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #6
It improved a ton because on the road he took to work everyday the car was so close to shifting to the next gear, when he added the gears it allowed the car to shift and improved his gas mileage because of this.
 
P

PowerJunkie

New Member
Jun 3, 2005
22
0
0
Jun 7, 2005
#7
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #7
With an auto the most I would go with is 3.73s. I hope you have a good stall to maximize the 4.10s. Motive has good gears. I've had them before and had no problems.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jun 7, 2005
#8
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #8
If its alot of city, then shoot hit the 4.30s. they would be even better with the high gearing of the tranny vs the 5spd (one less gear). I wasnt really refering to the gas milage dropping with 4.10s but was referring to the drivability.
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 7, 2005
#9
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #9
With an auto the most I would go with is 3.73s. I hope you have a good stall to maximize the 4.10s.
Click to expand...


sounds like good advice but i have no clue what a stall is

i was also thinking 4.30s but i would need drag radials :/

also this was asked in my last thread, SCT or Diablo Tune?
 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member
Founding Member
Aug 18, 2001
1,115
1
0
Paducah, KY
Jun 7, 2005
#10
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #10
I'm an SCT fan all the way, and the SCT Xcalibrator 2 just came out and you can get it for the same price as their old model!
 

hotrodnut

Member
Jul 12, 2004
672
0
17
North Florida
Jun 7, 2005
#11
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #11
Maza4ever14 said:
??


also i have an auto 04 GT, what is the correct way to race. all i have been doing is taking the OD and traction control off. some one told me to powerbrake at about 2500 rpm then floor it.

should i start from 1st and at what rpm should i up shift?

ANY INFO WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED!!! thanks in advance
Click to expand...

If you are Bracket Racing then you know it is all about being consistant and not how fast you are. With that said, in a perfect world your main goal is to run the same time everytime you run and be dead on your dial-in ET.

If you manualy shift your automatic you will chance being inconsistant as the computer controled shifts are basicly the same every time. A tuner will be able to change your shift points if you desire more speed.

Bringing your RPM's up at the start (stalling the torque converter) will intensify wheel spin. If you leave from a dead idle there is less chance of wheel spin and therefore you will be more consistant.

Also your reaction time is as important as your dial-in and you need to be consistant with that too. Once you get all your leaving the line reactions down to a consistant state you can adjust what light and when you are leaving to get your reaction times down as low as possible without red lighting. What I am building up to here is if you come off the line with your foot on the throttle stalling the converter vs having you foot somewhat away from the throttle at dead idle, you can get a run on the pedal by having your foot away from it. The time it takes for you to floor it will be quicker than having your foot against it because you can smack the pedal from a distance. This time period might only be a few thousands of a second but in Bracket Racing races are won and lost by .001 of a second!

Faster times are had without the traction control yes but try it both ways and see which is more consistant. Again consistant is the name of the game in Bracket Racing if you want to WIN! I would still leave the OD off as you know since there will be know need for it.
 
I

IJUSTWON

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
242
0
0
Jun 7, 2005
#12
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • #12
If you are looking for 4.10's email me at will.lamb@usmc.mil, brand new in box
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 8, 2005
#13
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #13
thanks for all the comments, but any more info on the motvie vs frpp?
 

edbo

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
198
0
0
Valley, AL
Jun 8, 2005
#14
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #14
Have you considered Motive 3.90s? That would give you a little extra gear running 3rd past the traps. I hear people that have them rave about them as many were those who decided on these instead of the normal 3.73 vs 4.10 gears that most talk about. When I had my gears installed the mechanic tried his best to talk me into 3.90s but I was set on 4.10s. Just thought I'd mention it. It is too bad FRPP doesn't have 3.90s.
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 8, 2005
#15
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #15
^i asked my mustang consultant (lol my homeboy) about the 4.10s vs 3.73s and he said maybe go 4.10s.

after reading another post about the problems 4.10s added to a guys car in this forum i was set back down to 3.73s but 3.90s would be great.
 

MGSTANG

Founding Member
Aug 4, 2002
383
0
0
Palm Bay Fl
Jun 8, 2005
#16
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • #16
3.73's 5-speed, 4.10's auto. And FRPP!!!!!!!!!!
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jun 10, 2005
#17
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #17
any more opinions? anyone own motives?
 

AdRock

Member
Nov 13, 2003
521
1
19
South Texas
Jun 10, 2005
#18
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #18
I have some Motive 4.10's in my '02 GT. They've been quiet since day one. I've had them in for almost a year now and I wouldn't hesitate to buy Motive if I did it again. The Motives are just as good as the FRPP gears. It's all in the install. You get a crappy install and they're gonna whine no matter what brand you buy. With a good install, they should be quiet no matter what brand you buy.
 

jeffnoel

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2002
1,638
5
37
Clovis, CA
Jun 10, 2005
#19
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #19
hotmustang331 said:
Also be warned that your RPMs will be crazy high with the auto, like 3K @ 70 i think LOL. 3.73s should drop that down to around 2600RPMs, its a big difference and I dont know about you but i cant stand driving around at 3K seems like its taching to much.
Click to expand...

With the 4.11s it will be more like 2600 rpm at 70, 2400 @ 70 with 3.73s.

http://www.wcfords.com/stuff/calcs/EGTcalc/egtcalc.php
 

Cobra Jay

Member
Apr 7, 2004
889
0
16
Motor City
Jun 10, 2005
#20
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • #20
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
936
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
O
Need a hand: Hanging idle with all new parts
  • Overused03
  • May 15, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2024
Overused03
O
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
902
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?