• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Motor Mount Selection Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68keyblr
  • Start date Start date Jan 22, 2016
  • Tags Tags
    energy suspension motor mounts tranny mount transmission mount

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Jan 22, 2016
#1
  • Jan 22, 2016
  • #1
I need to replace the motor and tranny mounts on my '86 T-Top. Here are the known engine mods:

- Yates SVO heads
- Tubular GT-40 intake
- 70mm Accufab TB
- 75mm Pro-M MAF w/ 24# injectors
- Non stock fairly lumpy cam (not sure of specs, installed by previous owner)

Also has:
- Subframe connectors
- T-5 tranny

It's probably making around 280 rwhp +/- 20 HP

This is currently my daily driver so I do not want any more NVH than the stock mounts. For that reason I would prefer a rubbber mount, but I am skeptical of using parts store stock replacement mounts for quality issues I have read about. Plus the stock style rubber might not hold up with the mods I've got.

I'm considering the Energy Suspension poly motor mounts with a stock style tranny mount.

If you have personal experience with this setup I would love to hear your feedback, particularly with respect to NVH

Or if you have had a positive or negative experience with the stock replacements I would like to hear about that as well.

Please help me decide
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Jan 23, 2016
#2
  • Jan 23, 2016
  • #2
Those are the ones I bought. I don't have any feedback yet. Motor is still on the stand lol.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,288
1,631
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 24, 2016
#3
  • Jan 24, 2016
  • #3
The energy suspension ones are pretty decent. It doesn't vibrate the car that bad at all.

Kurt
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
372
124
Phoenix
Jan 26, 2016
#4
  • Jan 26, 2016
  • #4
Energy Suspension mounts mimic the "convertible" and later hardtop mounts, and will probably lower the engine compared to the ones you have, assuming they're stock original. For your car, Prothane is probably a better bet since they mimic the earlier/non-convertible style mounts.
 

B.erazo712

Active Member
Feb 6, 2015
235
46
48
Jan 26, 2016
#5
  • Jan 26, 2016
  • #5
I have the Energy Suspension mounts and they are pretty good, I noticed they raised my engine though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Motor Mounts
  • Fri Guy
  • Mar 31, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
55
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2022
Fri Guy
F
Engine Engine Mounts - Rubber vs Poly
  • Mustang5L5
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 21, 2020
Mustang5L5
A
Once and for all what kind of motor mounts rubber or poly?
  • aztecgwynn
  • Feb 25, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
34
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2020
Habu135
Drivetrain Help with loud clutch bang sound.
  • AbhorrentSpecies
  • Nov 14, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 3, 2021
AbhorrentSpecies
A
1991 5.0 with HCI - started car, running for a few minutes, started pushing coolant into the overflow tank and then puking out from there. I'm lost
  • AmericanMuscle4.6GT
  • Oct 16, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 30, 2022
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?