• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Build Thread Mustang5L5's Build Thread -

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang5L5
  • Start date Start date Nov 12, 2020
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • …
  • 142
Next
First Prev 51 of 142 Next Last

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 21, 2021
#1,001
  • Nov 21, 2021
  • #1,001
Started the car up today, and idle was more or less the same. It idles well, but has a shake like a cylinder is misfiring. No fan on the car, so couldn’t warm it up and then run the CBT until I get that on. I did pull injector plug number 1 and the idle quality changed, so that cylinder is firing fine it seems.

New tensioner pulley is on, but wasn’t the cause. I found out what is making my accessory “knock”. Seems I have a slight misalignment of my pullies causing the belt to ride up and down on the WP pulley making a knock sound and chewing up the belt.

These are all Ford pullies, so I’ll need to mess with this to see where the issue is.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 21, 2021
#1,002
  • Nov 21, 2021
  • #1,002
Also wanted to get the check engine light functional. As some folks may know, 86-88 speed density 5.0s didn’t have a working CEL.

According to the EVTM, the wiring should exist on the car sonewhat.

So here’s the wiring at the cluster.


The wiring with the diode is the bulb check. This is missing in ‘86, and exists in 1987 but without the diodes.

Pulled my cluster, and the blk/blue wire and the tan wire are present.



According to the EVTM, the wire goes to connector C135 in the pass kick panel. From there it should plug into the ECU harness on pin 17.

My guess is the wire dead ends over in C135 and all I need to do is install a pin 17 connection in the ECU plug and connect it to c135 in the right spot.

And functional CEL.

Let’s go see if that’s the case
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 21, 2021
#1,003
  • Nov 21, 2021
  • #1,003
And lo and behold It’s exactly what I thought.

Found C135 and there’s our tan wire. Checked continuity to the cluster and had it.




Amd the other side. As predicted it’s empty. Further evidence that all these harnesses had minor changes that can cause issues (not that this is a huge issue) when mixing and matching.



Just need to connect this to pin 17 and my CEL should work.

I might make a how-to thread on this. Seems this is never covered in MAF swaps. (Because who cares right?)
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 21, 2021
#1,004
  • Nov 21, 2021
  • #1,004
pulled the ECU out and there is a single yellow/black wire on pin 17.

So about 4” from the ECU connector I tapped into the wire. I then tapped into the tan wire on the green connector. I used this style connector because in the future if the light is ever on, I can just disconnect it here for inspection and play the “ no CEL in 1988” card. My inspector doesn’t give a crap now, but who knows what the deal will be in the future.




And then viola! Functional CEL. Even tested it by dumping codes. I know this is not a nov deal to some, but this has bugged me for years that Ford never wired the SD cars for a CEL.

 
Last edited: Nov 21, 2021
Reactions: BlakeusMaximus, Kid wita 5oh and General karthief

Kid wita 5oh

I'm definitely not in the original hole
Founding Member
Nov 5, 2000
1,406
149
93
Saugus, MA
Nov 22, 2021
#1,005
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,005
Mustang5L5 said:
....in the future if the light is ever on, I can just disconnect it here for inspection and play the “ no CEL in 1988” card. My inspector doesn’t give a crap now, but who knows what the deal will be in the future.....
Click to expand...
Oh this wonderful state we live in... but It doesn't matter for inspections since it more than 15 yrs old. Exempt from emissions at that stage
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Nov 22, 2021
#1,006
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,006
Kid wita 5oh said:
Oh this wonderful state we live in... but It doesn't matter for inspections since it more than 15 yrs old. Exempt from emissions at that stage
Click to expand...
Meh…. that is a complete double edged sword. I live in a state where inspections aren’t……..period. Doesn’t matter what year, or how old the car is, Alabama thinks it’s just fine to let the smoking choking slashers bounce in and out of interstate medians when it rains because they’re driving on bald assed tires.

Because of no winter road salt, cars in Alabama don’t rot…They die of old age or neglect. And as has been proven many times, you can neglect a car pretty regularly and it will still run until it seizes, burns, or crashes into somebody else.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,915
10,563
203
polk county florida
Nov 22, 2021
#1,007
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,007
I also live in a no real inspection state, the regulation here says basically that when a vehicle is sold it has to have the emissions stuff installed and functional but
Can't count how many creaking (brand x) squeaking, clunking cars/truck that I know the ball joints and front end bushings are falling out. Smoking is another subject, unless it looks like a James Bond smoke screen they don't care.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,008
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,008
Kid wita 5oh said:
Oh this wonderful state we live in... but It doesn't matter for inspections since it more than 15 yrs old. Exempt from emissions at that stage
Click to expand...

I know. On paper it sounds like a terrible thing, but in reality inspections are easy with this car. I go to a guy i know, but for the most part they just check the tires, lights, wipers and make it look like they actually care. It's supposed to retain all the emmissions gear, but the inspector is not allowed to pop the hood. You could have a Coyote or a 351 under the hood and they wont be able to tell or do anything about it. I have cats on the car, and they only comment I get about the exhaust is "sounds good". I'm in and out in 10 min or less. My DD's are even quicker because it's just the OBD check. Part of it is because the inspectors just want to get cars in and out and onto the next car. If they actually checked everything they had to, it would be a 1 hour process all to make $20 or so.

It's kinda a BS money-making scheme, but compared to what potentially could happen like in CA, it's easy so I'll just shut my trap about it and pay the $35 or so.

CarMichael Angelo said:
Meh…. that is a complete double edged sword. I live in a state where inspections aren’t……..period. Doesn’t matter what year, or how old the car is, Alabama thinks it’s just fine to let the smoking choking slashers bounce in and out of interstate medians when it rains because they’re driving on bald assed tires.
Click to expand...

I had a coworker from NH, where there inspections are pretty much "Did it drive in on it's own power? Ok it passes then". He had an old toyota celica that was a rotting heap. The rear brake calipers were leaking, so he took a pair of vicegrips and crimped the rear brake lines shut. No rear brakes at all and he drove 50miles each way on the highway with this. The car had so much rot and neglect I am amazed it drove. Duct-tape here, screwed in strapping holding a bumper on, etc. One day on his way home, on the on-ramp to a highway the rear wheel fell off. Id didn't just come off the lugs, but the entire hub separated from the bearing. He was adamant it was sabotage and for a week was trying to get a peek at security footage around the company parking lot to see who sabotaged the wheel. I saw the video. Nobody touched the car. It was just a POS that fell apart finally.

It is a double-edged sword because I hate the idea of inspections, but understand the purpose.
 
Last edited: Nov 22, 2021

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,009
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,009
Here’s the next problem to solve

View: https://youtu.be/eH2chXArArE


The noise is strictly from the belt riding up and off the rear lip of the pulley.

Ford crank, WP, and PS pulley. new balancer, new WP. Easiest solution would be to have the WP pulley go in slightly, but I can't actually do that. I'm wondering if I pull the PS pulley out a tiny bit if that will correct it.

If i flip the belt, it rides perfect for a short while and then starts up again. Belt is getting chewed up, so obviously I need to correct this
 
Last edited: Nov 22, 2021

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,915
10,563
203
polk county florida
Nov 22, 2021
#1,010
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,010
I think the belt is broke. I would think a mis alignment would not bounce around like that, I've had a new belt on the dump truck, gates?? that had a perpetual squeak and after rebuilding nearly all the pulleys I put the old belt back on and silence, another crappy replacement part.
 
Reactions: nickyb

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,011
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,011
The belt is failing, but what caused it? It is a Gates belt

Here is how it wants to sit. As you can see it sits to the rear of the pulley and the edge of the belt is riding up on the lip. As the belt tears on the edge, it seems to grab the pulley more and wants to ride up. I flipped the belt but now both sides are torn up so i'll need to replace it, but only after finding out the root cause.



I think what i'll try is to grab a PS pulley remover and back the PS pulley out a tiny bit. No idea if that will cause too much misalighment with the AC pullley though. Can't hurt to try.

An aftermarket WP pulley without a lip, that had an edge that extended back might also solve it to. I'll need to see what aftermarket options are available. I could machine one up but that seems extreme.
 
Last edited: Nov 22, 2021

BlakeusMaximus

Still got to try a little lube on my speedo head
5 Year Member
Jul 12, 2017
2,474
1,348
173
Nov 22, 2021
#1,012
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,012
Mustang5L5 said:
pulled the ECU out and there is a single yellow/black wire on pin 17.

So about 4” from the ECU connector I tapped into the wire. I then tapped into the tan wire on the green connector. I used this style connector because in the future if the light is ever on, I can just disconnect it here for inspection and play the “ no CEL in 1988” card. My inspector doesn’t give a crap now, but who knows what the deal will be in the future.




And then viola! Functional CEL. Even tested it by dumping codes. I know this is not a nov deal to some, but this has bugged me for years that Ford never wired the SD cars for a CEL.

Click to expand...
Hey Mike, pretty cool on getting that check engine light to work. My car is a 88 as well, GT though. I have a "check oil" light, but its in the cluster just to the right under the gauge cluster. I wonder why yours is different. Not that is matters, just curious.
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,915
10,563
203
polk county florida
Nov 22, 2021
#1,013
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,013
You don't have some kind of 'straight edge' thing like a level or a carpenters square (that L shaped thing) to check alignment?
the harmonic balancer could also be out of alignment but less likely.
I 'd like to see a side view of the accessory drive.
Belts have strands of rope like materials covered with whatever material on the out side similar to radial tires, they can break on the inside causing it to bounce back and forth, I've seen this once before.
 
Last edited: Nov 22, 2021

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,014
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,014
General karthief said:
You don't have some kind of 'straight edge' thing like a level or a carpenters square (that L shaped thing) to check alignment?
the harmonic balancer could also be out of alignment but less likely.
I 'd like to see a side view of the accessory drive.
Belts have strands of rope like materials covered with whatever material on the out side similar to radial tires, they can break on the inside causing it to bounce back and forth, I've seen this once before.
Click to expand...

I've got one. I'll be trying it in the next few days. Stay tuned
 
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,015
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,015
BlakeusMaximus said:
Hey Mike, pretty cool on getting that check engine light to work. My car is a 88 as well, GT though. I have a "check oil" light, but its in the cluster just to the right under the gauge cluster. I wonder why yours is different. Not that is matters, just curious.
Click to expand...

Mine is an LX, so it never came with that little warning pod on the right. That was GT only. On the 87-89 Non-GT cars, Ford put it in the cluster.

I did add the GT warning lights to my car, so now both lights work. They are wired in parallel, so all you need to do is put a bulb it the spot in the cluster and both “check oil” lights will work.
 

BlakeusMaximus

Still got to try a little lube on my speedo head
5 Year Member
Jul 12, 2017
2,474
1,348
173
Nov 22, 2021
#1,016
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,016
Ah! I wasn't aware the LX didn't have those.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,017
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,017
BlakeusMaximus said:
Ah! I wasn't aware the LX didn't have those.
Click to expand...

Nope. Was always a peeve of mine. I hate when things don't work so having nonfunctional lights drives me up a wall.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 22, 2021
#1,018
  • Nov 22, 2021
  • #1,018
So I took advantage of LMRS 8% off Black Friday sale to order a bunch of little stuff I need to finish the car. Nothing major, but little odds and ends I need.

I needed a new radiator air deflector. My original was toast. The repro is what you would expect. Shinier than original and a lighter feeling plastic. Oh well.

Also picked up one of these, but it doesn’t fit the SN95 wiper motor perfectly. Will need to do some trimming at the connector end.

I still need to actually wire in the proper wiper motor plug.

 
Reactions: General karthief and RaggedGT

Trogdor

5 Year Member
Aug 30, 2018
195
119
53
Anna, TX
Nov 25, 2021
#1,019
  • Nov 25, 2021
  • #1,019
Did you replace your water pump? Could it be sticking out just enough to mess up the pulley alignment?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Nov 25, 2021
#1,020
  • Nov 25, 2021
  • #1,020
Trogdor said:
Did you replace your water pump? Could it be sticking out just enough to mess up the pulley alignment?
Click to expand...

Yes, it’s an edelbrock. Sticking out a tiny bit dod cross my mind.
 
Reactions: 2Blue2
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • …
  • 142
Next
First Prev 51 of 142 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Mustang5L5’s progress thread - Rear window fun
  • Mustang5L5
  • Feb 29, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 22 23 24
Replies
479
Views
29K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Wednesday at 7:17 PM
General karthief
Ultimate 5-lug swap thread - new/updated
  • Mustang5L5
  • Jul 21, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
34K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 13, 2024
qikgts
Progress Thread Akumu No Dara Ra's LSX swap and build Thread! Updated (2/10/22 @ 8:30PM CST)
  • Akumu No Dara Ra
  • Feb 4, 2022
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
140
Views
16K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2022
Akumu No Dara Ra
Q
Foxbody 5.4 4V Build Thread
  • QSACfoxbody
  • Feb 14, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 28, 2025
Metalriff
M
Progress Thread Tannerc91gt’s Build(s) Thread
  • tannerc91gt
  • Jul 6, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 79 80 81
Replies
2K
Views
197K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 8, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?