• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Need help with OTS cam for my 331

  • Thread starter Thread starter juiced_94gt
  • Start date Start date Jan 9, 2008

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Jan 9, 2008
#1
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #1
Well im removing the motor to tear it apart to get to the bottom of this knock it has , well since it's coming out I might as well see if there is a better OTS cam for it, custom is out of the question because of funds right now and I don't need anymore downtime also, my current combo is: CHP 331 flat top pistons, AFR 185's, TFS stage 2 cam, TFS track heat manifold, 80mm LMAF, 70mm BBK TB, BBK longtubes, 5-speed, deleted EGR, and smog pump. Is there a better OTS cam than the TFS stage 2 or should I just stick to what I have?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 9, 2008
#2
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #2
how much room you have for lift?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 9, 2008
#3
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #3
AFM N-71 with their valve spring kit. Custom is best choice and isn't much more expensive. You WILL need valve springs regardless.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 9, 2008
#4
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #4
PUNISHER RACING said:
how much room you have for lift?
Click to expand...

Lift does not effect piston to valve clearance.

The N-71 powerband is for 2,700-6,700 RPM.
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Jan 9, 2008
#5
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #5
Grn92LX said:
AFM N-71 with their valve spring kit. Custom is best choice and isn't much more expensive. You WILL need valve springs regardless.
Click to expand...

Sorry forgot to mention I have the PS3 spring kit from Ed Curtis
 

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Jan 9, 2008
#6
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #6
I dont spin the motor past 6200rpm is the n-71 alittle much?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Jan 9, 2008
#7
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #7
5spd GT said:
Lift does not effect piston to valve clearance.

The N-71 powerband is for 2,700-6,700 RPM.
Click to expand...

How do you figure if you have .120 of clearance with a .550 lift cam and you want to step up to a .650 inch solid roller I think lift would play a pretty crutial role wouldn't you?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 9, 2008
#8
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #8
PUNISHER RACING said:
How do you figure if you have .120 of clearance with a .550 lift cam and you want to step up to a .650 inch solid roller I think lift would play a pretty crutial role wouldn't you?
Click to expand...

Because piston to valve clearance occurs at the period of overlap.

It is when the exhaust valve is closing and the intake valve is opening, therefore, both valves are open at the same time when the piston is at top dead center.

Peak lift occurs when the piston is a good 1.5-2.0" in the bore.

Lift is not the factor, but probably the last factor to even consider.

Why would you want the valve to open up fully when the piston is near the top of it's travel? That would be very inefficient.

You would want the peak area of flow out of the head, past the valve, when the cylinder has the most volume to fill. It would not have any volume to fill at top dead center.

A stock camshaft would hit if it had late exhaust closing and early intake opening events with a steep ramp rate.

You also want more clearance on the exhaust side for a few reasons...

Juiced - I really wish you would work another couple hours and just spring for a $325 custom camshaft. He will even do all his business through emails if need be.

I personally believe the N-71 can be beat by a custom camshaft for just a little bit more money and you could have a more useable powerband.

The fact that you have Ed's PS3 valve springs gives you an edge already.

You will see your power output increase enough to put a big smile on your face
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jan 9, 2008
#9
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #9
juiced_94gt said:
I dont spin the motor past 6200rpm is the n-71 alittle much?
Click to expand...

The N71 will NOT go to 6,700 on a 331 with a track heat intake. I would go custom for sure knowing you have the ps3 spring kit. I used to have the ps3 springs, until one broke
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Jan 9, 2008
#10
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #10
Call Anderson or email them, usually Brian will write back he is very informative, i had many conversations with him before we both decided an Anderson b-21 cam was the best choice for what my car is. Drop him a line, but i strongly suggest Anderson, my belief is they offer the best Off the shelf cams.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 9, 2008
#11
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #11
A Trickflow Track Heat has more cross section than a regular street/track heat head. There would be no reason why the intake could not pull the rpm, if the heads can. We have all seen the heads do it. So why would the intake not?

My old 306 could have easily hit 6,500 if I wanted it too.

That was just a measely Performer

You could pull 7k if you wanted too, but you will not be making any progressive power there.

The N-71 is designed with 331 cubes in mind, labeled as 302-331. I would imagine Rick Anderson would label the rpm potential accordingly.

They state, "poor driveability" below 2,400 rpm.

A custom camshaft is not going to give you that issue, and I bet you will make the same power if you ask for it.

The cost between the Anderson camshaft's and FTI are fairly close. Close enough for me.
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
Jan 9, 2008
#12
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #12
I believe power is sacrificed for driveability in a custom cam for the street



get a comp cams 276HR
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 9, 2008
#13
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #13
91 HATCH said:
I believe power is sacrificed for driveability in a custom cam for the street



get a comp cams 276HR
Click to expand...

Driveability goes up if you want it, over a off the shelf camshaft. I know it did with my FTI camshaft. I daily drove it as my only vehicle for over 2.5 years...

The camshaft is tailored to your combination, not the 100s of possible combination for 302, 331, and 347 engines.

It is all what you are willing to give up.

You can get a custom camshaft with pure driveability being the factor.

Or a mix between the two, or pure race

Many people think a custom camshaft is for pure performance, but it is not.

Unfortunately, you see this on the other end of the spectrum.

Many assume since you have X parts, that you should run X time, especially when you have a "custom" camshaft tailored for what the driver wants.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Jan 10, 2008
#14
  • Jan 10, 2008
  • #14
91 HATCH said:
I believe power is sacrificed for driveability in a custom cam for the street



get a comp cams 276HR
Click to expand...

That one of the dumbest things Ive heard. If all out power was all that was needed why arent you running a TLSR camshaft and shaft mount RR's. A custom cam from some one like Ed Curtis or Jay allen will give you the most power while still being streetable. Then again the term streetable is subjective.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
LESS THAN 9.5 MPG CITY DRIVING!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 15, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
92
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2023
PonyGTrider
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
95 GT getting Trickflow upper engine kit and more after 20 years parked, help required.
  • newfiestang
  • Oct 18, 2022
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
4K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 22, 2022
96pushrod
S
Engine Ultimate mystery need help
  • saleen92sc
  • May 15, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 16, 2022
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?