• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

new dyno results!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 302fordracer
  • Start date Start date Jun 9, 2005

302fordracer

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
738
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jun 9, 2005
#1
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #1
last time I went to the dyno I was running wayyyy rich...had a 10.9:1 a/f ratio at WOT and I put down 229/266...yesterday I went back to have the pull some fuel out of it and they figured they would in the process add 2 degrees of timing...so now running properly on the loaded MUSTANG dyno I put down 240 rwhp and 277 rwtq...not bad for my mods I would say...
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Jun 9, 2005
#2
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #2
Nope, not bad at all.
 

302fordracer

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
738
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jun 9, 2005
#3
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #3
I forgot I had a question to make this thread tech related and that is that the readings that we got for a/f this time were much better so we added a little timing and now it pings if it is above say 70 outside...the timing we added was very minimal and should not have caused the engine to ping as it did...so I am wondering since this seems to be temperature related (hot weather pinging) should I be looking at my ACT and ECT sensors or are we talking more likely ignition/fuel related?? My tuner says that I would be (99% certain) throwing a CE light if the sensors were to blame...
 

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Jun 9, 2005
#4
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #4
Chung may be right, however sensors are tricky. By this, I mean that they can be on the fritz but still sending requisite signals to the ECU. If the sensor in question is fouled or wearing out but still is doing it's job (albeit not well), the ECU will not throw a code. I would replace any suspect sensors as a starting point. They are pretty cheap.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 9, 2005
#5
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #5
302fordracer said:
I forgot I had a question to make this thread tech related and that is that the readings that we got for a/f this time were much better so we added a little timing and now it pings if it is above say 70 outside...the timing we added was very minimal and should not have caused the engine to ping as it did...so I am wondering since this seems to be temperature related (hot weather pinging) should I be looking at my ACT and ECT sensors or are we talking more likely ignition/fuel related?? My tuner says that I would be (99% certain) throwing a CE light if the sensors were to blame...
Click to expand...

Check out this thread. He replaced his ACT and ECT sensors, and his pinging came back. Ended up it was a vacuum leak. Good luck

EDIT: Woops, forgot the link, lol.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=553063
 

302fordracer

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
738
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jun 9, 2005
#6
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #6
it came back years later...I would think that in his case they were two separate problems...
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 9, 2005
#7
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #7
Can you give more details about the values of fuel and spark?

What method was used to tune?

Can you put up the pull for us to see?

Later
Grady
 

302fordracer

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
738
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jun 9, 2005
#8
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #8
well the pinging is gone because I backed the timing back down to 10 degrees but I want to run more timing...I think I should be able to...I mean 12 degrees oughtta be safe so I would think that a sensor is on its last legs... if the sensors were in tip top shape I would think they could handle this small increase in timing...i don't know...
 

302fordracer

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
738
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Jun 9, 2005
#9
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • #9
ya I will scan the dyno chart and make a new thread about this tomorrow so you can check it out grady.. I wanna say the a/f ratios were maximum 13.5 and minimum 11.7...but I will scan it tomorrow...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
362
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
207
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
324
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 21, 2026
X-cam34
X
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
527
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?