• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

New #'s in

  • Thread starter Thread starter TallyMan
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2004
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 12, 2004
#1
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #1
I just got back from the dyno, getting a chip burnt after my ATI blower install on my 88 tbird turbo coupe. the #'s were 420rwhp, and 420rwtq, and that was with a slipping clutch and slipping blower belt. The guy tuning my car said I will easiliy see another 40-60hp/tq once I fix the clutch, and tighten the blower belt. I didnt want to tighten the blower belt at the dyno as I think it would have aggrevated the slipping clutch even more..

Steve
 

hemi_fan

Active Member
Apr 8, 2004
279
3
28
Ontario, Canada
Aug 12, 2004
#2
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #2
damn, those are some NICE numbers you're pullin there! got any pics of this thing? I love the 87-88 T-birds!
 

FrdMustangCpe

New Member
May 27, 2004
493
0
0
Sin City, NV
Aug 12, 2004
#3
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #3
sweet #s
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 12, 2004
#4
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #4
I am at work so i dont have pics right now of the car, but I do have some of the engine bay and stuff... Wanna see them??

Steve
 

hemi_fan

Active Member
Apr 8, 2004
279
3
28
Ontario, Canada
Aug 12, 2004
#5
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #5
Yeah, pics are awesome! A guy in my school had a 87' 5.0 T-bird with 10-hole rims. Looked and SOUNDED amazing. Plus the guy drove like a maniac and showed off all the time, that car made me want a 5.0 so bad. Unfortunately u can only get t-birds in Automatic, and they're a lot harder to find than stangs anyway. so i went with the mustang. Im not complaining tho, I love my car!
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 12, 2004
#6
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #6
Heres some pics...
 

Attachments

  • Bird-Bay1.webp
    42.1 KB · Views: 164
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 13, 2004
#7
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #7
What do you guy's think she'll pull in the 1/4 now ?? With and without slicks??
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 13, 2004
#8
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #8
That's a sick looking Bird!!!!!!!!!!
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 13, 2004
#9
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #9
As far as ET's go 420hp is close to what my AOD car has and I have run a best of 12.90 @112 with some serious traction and tuning issues. Altitude corrected thats 12.40-12.45. With 2.2 60ft's that's what you could expect. With very good traction you could see bottom 11's.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 13, 2004
#10
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #10
I'd say the slipping clutch could over inflate your numbers man with the engine revving so much faster from the slip. I'd retune it once thos eissues are fixed.

Whats the set up?
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 13, 2004
#11
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #11
i am planning on a re-tune once the clutch is done.. The clutch is not slipping bad at all, in fact to most people they cant even tell. Once the clutch got nice and warm it did start grabbing really good at the dyno too.

As far as the et, I was pulling 13.1 @106 without the charger w/slicks, I was also pulling the front wheels about an inch or so on launch with 1.7 60's. I am anticipating now with the blower to be around 11.5 or lower with slicks.
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 13, 2004
#12
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #12
The combo is a gt-40 long block, ATI P1SC w/3-core. I have just about all the bolt ons. 42 lb inj, gt-40 intake, complete msd ignition, 70mm t/b, equal length shorties, x-pipe (no cats), 2.5 tails, pro-m ati MAF, cobra ECU, etc... 4.10 gears, tremec....
 

what_stanger?

I am the mailman!!
Founding Member
Feb 7, 2002
1,697
0
36
Northern Illinois
Aug 14, 2004
#13
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #13
TallyMan said:
i am planning on a re-tune once the clutch is done.. The clutch is not slipping bad at all, in fact to most people they cant even tell. Once the clutch got nice and warm it did start grabbing really good at the dyno too.

As far as the et, I was pulling 13.1 @106 without the charger w/slicks, I was also pulling the front wheels about an inch or so on launch with 1.7 60's. I am anticipating now with the blower to be around 11.5 or lower with slicks.
Click to expand...

you must shift slow or somthing..

i cut a 1.75 60' (drag radials) a 60' like yours, trapped 105.8 (call it 106), like yours, but i ran a 12.8x
??????
 

what_stanger?

I am the mailman!!
Founding Member
Feb 7, 2002
1,697
0
36
Northern Illinois
Aug 14, 2004
#14
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #14
with 420 hp on the ground, thats a solid low 11 second car.
with a good 60' (and that power is capable of 1.6s maybe even 1.5s) you could see an awesome time.

suspension will have alot to do with it, if you plan on 'milking' it.
taking the power its got on tap, and using it to its full potential.

i see guys run 13.5s at 115 mph, thats 11 second mph right there!
if you're using slicks, it'll be fun as hell out of the hole!!
 
T

TallyMan

Founding Member
May 29, 2002
293
0
0
Litchfield, NH
Aug 14, 2004
#15
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #15
what_stanger? said:
you must shift slow or somthing..

i cut a 1.75 60' (drag radials) a 60' like yours, trapped 105.8 (call it 106), like yours, but i ran a 12.8x
??????
Click to expand...

Not really shifting slow, consider that i am in a tbird though, which is at least a couple hundred pounds heavier than a mustang. And according to your sig you weigh in a 3200+ lbs, mine is like 3650-3700lbs.
 

blown93feature

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
151
0
0
living on edge like the motor
Aug 14, 2004
#16
  • Aug 14, 2004
  • #16
I would say your looking at a 11.90 pass @ around 115.You have a couple of things against you,weight,suspention,standard.If you get a 1.7 shorty than your looking at a mid 11.8. You will always be a little quicker with an auto because you don't come out of boost and you can't shift fast enough to keep up with an auto.
The thing to remember is mph happens after the 1/8th so it's a matter of putting the tourque you have to good use out the hole and up to the 1/8th mile and from there hp plays it's role to carry you the rest of the way.

I have 425 to the ground through the auto,no trans brake big plows up front at the time of the pull and a race weight of 3600 with me in it,time is in the sig.

Good luck I wish you the best

Edit,don't get me confussed about standard trany being against you.I'm refering to coming in and out of boost not coming out of the hole
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
5
What's it Worth? 1990 Notchback 5.0
  • 50notch90
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
4
Views
2K
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 23, 2024
50notch90
5
Fuel Fuel Pump Rewire, New Fuel Lines, and Installation of New Fuel Pump Hanger with AN6 Connections
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 12, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
13K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 16, 2023
AeroCoupe
New to me Fox body. Looking for Rough HP and compression ratio
  • Halford4491
  • Oct 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?