• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

NOT GOOD!!! MY CAR RUNS AT 230 DEGREES

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88mustng
  • Start date Start date Nov 20, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Nov 21, 2004
#21
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #21
Freak..
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Nov 21, 2004
#22
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #22
DMAN302 said:
Freak..
Click to expand...
oh no, here we go again.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#23
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #23
The ecu also begins to add fuel (richer) at elevated temps in an attempt to cool the engine...
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Nov 21, 2004
#24
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #24
Michael Yount said:
The ecu also begins to add fuel (richer) at elevated temps in an attempt to cool the engine...
Click to expand...
oh yeah - forgot about that one.

Michael, the way threads are going lately, you better be careful. pretty soon we are gonna have people saying that they like to let the car overheat to get the most performance (with the extra fuel dump and richness it brings).
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#25
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #25
*
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#26
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #26
*
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#27
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #27
raph - the stock radiator is fine WHEN IT'S NEW. The problem is that they're all 10-15 years old now - and at that age the majority of them are shot, so clogged with mineral deposits that they're effectiveness is extremely reduced.

I'm not saying the problem is his radiator; but if it's original, I'd bet it's contributing to the problem.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Nov 21, 2004
#28
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #28
Michael Yount said:
raph - the stock radiator is fine WHEN IT'S NEW. The problem is that they're all 10-15 years old now - and at that age the majority of them are shot, so clogged with mineral deposits that they're effectiveness is extremely reduced.

I'm not saying the problem is his radiator; but if it's original, I'd bet it's contributing to the problem.
Click to expand...
ahh, you beat me to it, Michael. i bet the stock radiator has seem better days.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#29
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #29
"the engine can handle almost 300* before smoking and damage occurs"

Alright everyone - this is the advice we've all been waiting for.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#30
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #30
*
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Nov 21, 2004
#31
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #31
"the stock radiator is fine no matter what age it is"

Oh my.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#32
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #32
*
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Nov 21, 2004
#33
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #33
raph130 said:
the stock radiator is fine no matter what age it is. my radiator has over 200k miles on it. my engine runs super cool all day. my last stang had 130k miles on it, it ran extremely well also, and a mustang i had before that had around 120k miles and i never had one cooling problem. i have never encountered a clogged radiator in my life. i have had over 14 cars and every single car had high mileage some with extremely over 180k. clogged radiator can be unclogged with chemicals you can buy at autozone or some hardware store. i am the 3rd owner of my mustang and i spoke with both the 2 owners of my car and i know its entire history.
Click to expand...

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh brother.

Anyway... now that we know that old worn our radiators are just as good as brand new ones NOT. Just ONE of the things that I think Mike is referring to, I referenced above. Have you checked inside of the thing yet for buildup? I refer to that buildup as "scale" but it is in fact, the mineral deposits that Mike is talking about. There are several different products out there that are used to reduce or remove this scale but I've found that if the radiator is either very old or has allot of buildup then it's better just to replace the thing and be done with it. Over time, the disimilar metals in the cooling system actually corrode the exposed surfaces inside of the radiator and it's just not worth it to try and breathe new life into an otherwise old radiator.

Another thought about your cooling problem though:
You ever been in any sort of front end fender bender? If so... Is your current water pump the one that was in the car when it happened? The reason that I ask is that a few years ago I had a pretty mild front ender that actually managed to break a couple of the vanes off of the water pump impeller. You could not tell form the outside that the pump was damaged. I've also seen instances where the impeller on "cheap" replacement pumps were affixed to the shaft in such a way that the shaft was able to spin without the vanes turning. Those kinds of pumps seem to be rare though.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#34
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #34
*
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Nov 21, 2004
#35
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #35
raph130 said:
the stock radiator is fine no matter what age it is. my radiator has over 200k miles on it. my engine runs super cool all day. my last stang had 130k miles on it, it ran extremely well also, and a mustang i had before that had around 120k miles and i never had one cooling problem. i have never encountered a clogged radiator in my life. i have had over 14 cars and every single car had high mileage some with extremely over 180k. clogged radiator can be unclogged with chemicals you can buy at autozone or some hardware store. i am the 3rd owner of my mustang and i spoke with both the 2 owners of my car and i know its entire history.
Click to expand...
Raph, remember correlation is not causation; just because you have had good luck with something does not mean it is a hard and fast rule. radiators do clog up, esp if neglected or hard water is used. scale and deposits form and adhere to the radiator in a way that usually makes it hard to get it near 100% again. let alone tubes splitting and rusting through.

so, as with your fan issue, im happy that it works for you. using the same fan analogy, just because it works for you (your fan clutch is shot), does not mean that it will work for everyone. i think you would agree with that.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#36
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #36
*
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Nov 21, 2004
#37
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #37
Read and Heed!

Direct Quote from MSTANG:

raph- I suggest you sit back & learn a bit more before you decide to pick up a mouse & keyboard again.
Click to expand...
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#38
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #38
*
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Nov 21, 2004
#39
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #39
raph130 said:
if something works on it it works on all. according to ford any temp within "normal" is ok. ive had this same response from qualified mechanics. i highly doubt the guy is running hot because of the radiator.
Click to expand...
your first sentiments: i would be very careful with blanket statements. i disagree and will leave it at that.

the stock gauges are hysteretic - barely more than idiot lights. mine does not move from 180*-225*. i would not base any conclusion on those gauges. i guess that is just me. I am very anal about knowing what is going on exactly inside the motor.

as an aside, you note that you dont have a problem with coolant temps of 230. the motor oil would likely be running around 280-300, depending upon how hard the car was being driven. i certainly would not let conventional oil (what is recommended for our cars, as far as i know) run for any period at those temps. again, probably just me.
 
R

raph130

Founding Member
Mar 20, 2002
517
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#40
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #40
*
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 2 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
1996 gt mustang block temp vs coolant temp
  • Dkuehn
  • May 21, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
73
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 22, 2026
squeak93
Engine Themostat
  • Mindseye007
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
764
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
86HO5.0
8
O
2001 mustang gt overheating
  • orinsmiley11
  • Jul 17, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
329
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
Noobz347
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
703
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 17, 2026
fasterthangas
F
Resolved Got Too Hot!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
598
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?