• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Playing catch up to z28's...

  • Thread starter Thread starter CobraSVT95
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Sep 1, 2004
#41
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #41
Im not crapping on anyone's parade but I think your chances of taking an LS1 with stock heads slim at best. Unless there worked.

I raced a new SRT-4 at the track. It was a cool night and I had street tires. Off the launch I had hella tire spin, however I did quickly catch the SRT-4 and w a little hit of the giggle gas in 2nd gear managed to run a 13.7 @106mph. Now if I had some drag radials or been able to improve my launch with that speed I have no doubt that I could have hit very low 13s. I didn't have time for a second run because the track was way overcrowded.

My point here is that I had E7te heads. But they had been fully ported and polished. There is a huge difference between the stock heads I had and these.
 

Yellow302

Member
Mar 2, 2003
789
2
19
NJ
Sep 1, 2004
#42
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #42
Hey guys my dad's got a 99 LS1 Z28.

He has a computer chip, air filter, gears.

Raced a 2003 Cobra from 60-100, we were neck and neck the whole time.

Damn LS1's are fast ass hell.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Sep 1, 2004
#43
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #43
greenlantern said:
Off the launch I had hella tire spin, however I did quickly catch the SRT-4 and w a little hit of the giggle gas in 2nd gear managed to run a 13.7 @106mph.
My point here is that I had E7te heads. But they had been fully ported and polished. There is a huge difference between the stock heads I had and these.
Click to expand...

Well you need to get some tires or go rethink how you drive. With stock heads and cam i was going 13.6s at 101.70-102mph. Just think i would have beaten you and you would have been using nitrous.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Sep 1, 2004
#44
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #44
Ferocity02- Now i see what ur saying, but i was just quoting average numbers. 440rwhp is on the very wild side of N/A LS1s. I have had a few friends with them, and one his 392rwhp, and one just cracked 400rwhp with H/C/LS6 intake. Which is strong. When i say 370+rwhp with a 347 i mean with a light streetable combo. Hell there are a few people on here with 320-330rwhp with just H/C/I on their 5.0s. I have "Heard" of people hitting 450rwhp with a 347, there are so many variables. I know you said you dont know much abou stangs, basically a 347 stroked 5.0L will match up with a 346 cube LS1 very nicely. When you stroke the LS1 the you have to start comparing it to a stroked 351W.
 

Ferocity02

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
33
0
0
Auburn, CA
Sep 1, 2004
#45
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #45
mto502 said:
I think you're being awfully optomistic. You'll be lucky to see just over 400 rwhp WITH the heads. I know a few that have done the stage 2 ARE package with heads and cam and they're all around 400-412 rwhp including the tune. These numbers are with cutouts open, no cats and all the other mods you mentioned you wanted to have. In fact F-Body folks are also finding that maintaining the stock TB is achieving better numbers. Also, don't remove the screen.
Click to expand...

I dont think it's very optimistic at all. I don't doubt you knowledge of LS1's and mods, but an LS1 running under 400 rwhp with heads either has a very poor tune or there is some other major problems. 400 rwhp is VERY doable, especially for a car that has nearly every bolt-on avaliable. Any H/C/Bolt-on LS1 under 400 rwhp I would imagine that there is some other problem with the car, or they are running the stock LS1 intake, which is a big restriction.

As for your TB comment, you must be confusing the MAF with the TB. Ported TB's have been proven on the dyno to offer around 5-8 rwhp on a stock LS1, more for modded motors. The MAF sensor however, is awesome from the factory, and should not be changed to an 85mm version until there is about 450 rwhp. Removing the screen on the MAF is definitly a good mod. I have ported mine as well, but got dyno tuned shortly after to fix the A/F.
 

Ferocity02

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
33
0
0
Auburn, CA
Sep 1, 2004
#46
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #46
mattkimsey said:
Lets not forget about the f-bodies dinky 7.5 rear end. Some people have broke them in a stock car on drag radials. Better 60 foot times go to the Mustangs.
Click to expand...

Yes, very true. The stock Chevy 10-bolt is trash. Its great for stock cars, but just wasn't meant to be at the strip. With a sticky set of drag radials or ET streets, and some high RPM launches, I wouldn't expect the rear end to last more than a couple runs
 

Ferocity02

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
33
0
0
Auburn, CA
Sep 1, 2004
#47
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #47
WhiteDevil said:
Ferocity02- Now i see what ur saying, but i was just quoting average numbers. 440rwhp is on the very wild side of N/A LS1s. I have had a few friends with them, and one his 392rwhp, and one just cracked 400rwhp with H/C/LS6 intake. Which is strong. When i say 370+rwhp with a 347 i mean with a light streetable combo. Hell there are a few people on here with 320-330rwhp with just H/C/I on their 5.0s. I have "Heard" of people hitting 450rwhp with a 347, there are so many variables. I know you said you dont know much abou stangs, basically a 347 stroked 5.0L will match up with a 346 cube LS1 very nicely. When you stroke the LS1 the you have to start comparing it to a stroked 351W.
Click to expand...

As I said before, I dont think H/C/I LS1's running 392-400 rwhp are exactly running at their full potential. I just skimmed through the LS1 dyno archives and there was one cam only car at 405 rwhp, and one bolt-on only car at 375 rwhp, and even one with a small LS6 cam at 399 rwhp.

Here are some good links:

http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165913

http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=180572

http://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=207060 (read the 4th and 6th posts )
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Sep 1, 2004
#48
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #48
Yikes ! Yes I meant the MAF.

I don't have great knowledge about the mods for F-Body's in general but what I do know is that the heads and cam packages I've seen put together here locally have been producing slightly above the 400 rwhp mark. One fellow I know who just had his 01 Firehawk stolen just had an ARE heads and cam package put together and he was right around 412 rwhp with tune.
Another guy just had a similar package done and he was around 398 rwhp. In fact I raced him a couple of time at the track.
 

Ferocity02

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
33
0
0
Auburn, CA
Sep 1, 2004
#49
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #49
mto502 said:
Yikes ! Yes I meant the MAF.

I don't have great knowledge about the mods for F-Body's in general but what I do know is that the heads and cam packages I've seen put together here locally have been producing slightly above the 400 rwhp mark. One fellow I know who just had his 01 Firehawk stolen just had an ARE heads and cam package put together and he was right around 412 rwhp with tune.
Another guy just had a similar package done and he was around 398 rwhp. In fact I raced him a couple of time at the track.
Click to expand...

Yikes! Did he ever get his car back? There are some H/C LS1's that dyno around 400 rwhp, it obviously depends greatly on the parts used. In the third link I posted up there is it thought that 390 rwhp H/C LS1 is pathetic to say the least... especially when some cam only cars are putting out more than than
 

mattkimsey

I've compiled a list to recap this thread:
Jan 22, 2004
346
0
0
Bessemer City NC
Sep 1, 2004
#50
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #50
a 347 with the right h/c/i will match up well against a ls1 with h/c/i.
 

AznStanger3v

Active Member
Aug 11, 2003
2,026
0
47
Northern VA
Sep 1, 2004
#51
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #51
its kind of refreshing to have a camaro guy come in here and shoot the breeze with us instead of starting a big pissing contest. the LS1 motors can be sick as hell, but with every engine, you need to plan for a combo, not a solid part. Its possible to have a HCI LS1 and only have 370 to the wheels.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Sep 1, 2004
#52
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #52
Ferocity02 said:
As I said before, I dont think H/C/I LS1's running 392-400 rwhp are exactly running at their full potential. I just skimmed through the LS1 dyno archives and there was one cam only car at 405 rwhp, and one bolt-on only car at 375 rwhp, and even one with a small LS6 cam at 399 rwhp.
Click to expand...
Those are some great links. And definatly some serious cars. About the LS6 cam, ive seen a few stock Z06s and they dyno at about 350rwhp give or take, Why would an LS1 with that cam make that much power?
 

mattkimsey

I've compiled a list to recap this thread:
Jan 22, 2004
346
0
0
Bessemer City NC
Sep 1, 2004
#53
  • Sep 1, 2004
  • #53
Most people that want to stay emissions legal with an ls1 or put in weak cam need h/c/i to make 400rwhp.

Most people with 347 stangs don't use the right parts to make 420+ rwhp. A good combo would be 347 w/ higher compression pistons, FTI cam, longtubes, AFR 205's or TFS-R. A guy on Corral (clnpwr) made 474 rwhp with a 347.

Here is a womans car that lives near me http://fbodymotorsports.com/our_cars she has a stroker kit h/c/i and makes 425hp...she goes on to say they can get that out of their h/c/i cars now though.
 
1

1996COBRA

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
360
0
0
dallas
Sep 2, 2004
#54
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #54
I stopped reading the thread half way through because I'm tired so if it has been said sorry but here goes the route i'd take:

4.10 gears with a sticky tire (drag radial or et.street)
full exhaust (long tubes, o/r mid pipe, catback)
pullies and a 150 dry shot (and a heck of a driver)
SHOULD beat STOCK LS1s all day

BUT around here there are more cammed and juiced, LS1s than i can shake a stick at, and one must choose his/her "fights" carefully

and i agree that the "ram air" on SS's/WS6s do very little... Z28s,Formulas,T/As,SS's and WS6s of the same year perform equally

either way good luck on ur F-body hunting!
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Sep 2, 2004
#55
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #55
17yrOldStanger said:
its kind of refreshing to have a camaro guy come in here and shoot the breeze with us instead of starting a big pissing contest. the LS1 motors can be sick as hell, but with every engine, you need to plan for a combo, not a solid part. Its possible to have a HCI LS1 and only have 370 to the wheels.
Click to expand...


I have seen a h/c/i stang with only 250hp. He didn't match his parts very well and he never got it tuned.
 

Ferocity02

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
33
0
0
Auburn, CA
Sep 2, 2004
#56
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #56
WhiteDevil said:
Those are some great links. And definatly some serious cars. About the LS6 cam, ive seen a few stock Z06s and they dyno at about 350rwhp give or take, Why would an LS1 with that cam make that much power?
Click to expand...

First off, and LS6 is pretty close to an LS1 except for the cam and heads, intake, and some minor block and fueling differences. Stock Z06's usually go about 350-365 rwhp stock. The reason the LS6 cammed LS1's dyno so high is because they have many other mods, which a stock LS6 does not have, such as LT headers, induction mods, bolt-ons, etc... If you just put a LS6 cam into an otherwise stock LS1, it would probably put down about 340 rwhp.
 

mto502

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2002
357
0
0
Ancaster, Ontario
Sep 2, 2004
#57
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #57
Ferocity02 said:
Yikes! Did he ever get his car back? There are some H/C LS1's that dyno around 400 rwhp, it obviously depends greatly on the parts used. In the third link I posted up there is it thought that 390 rwhp H/C LS1 is pathetic to say the least... especially when some cam only cars are putting out more than than
Click to expand...
Nope, she's a goner. It happened at the dealership too !!
You may even know him from LS1tech, LS1.COM or LS2.COM. He's a moderator on LS2.COM now but was a mod on LS1.COM.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Sep 2, 2004
#58
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #58
Ferocity02 said:
First off, and LS6 is pretty close to an LS1 except for the cam and heads, intake, and some minor block and fueling differences. Stock Z06's usually go about 350-365 rwhp stock. The reason the LS6 cammed LS1's dyno so high is because they have many other mods, which a stock LS6 does not have, such as LT headers, induction mods, bolt-ons, etc... If you just put a LS6 cam into an otherwise stock LS1, it would probably put down about 340 rwhp.
Click to expand...
Oh ok i seemed like you were saying that with just the cam it made that kind of power.
 

94Blue302GT

Member
Oct 20, 2003
704
3
19
Chicago
Sep 2, 2004
#59
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #59
i don't see what all the fuss is about them SS's. I was neck to neck with one in my 5 spd. Hpipe, cold air, 14*, sticky radials, but also subs. Do they make Lt1 SS's? Maybe the guy put the emblems on there?
 

Ferocity02

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
33
0
0
Auburn, CA
Sep 2, 2004
#60
  • Sep 2, 2004
  • #60
94Blue302GT said:
i don't see what all the fuss is about them SS's. I was neck to neck with one in my 5 spd. Hpipe, cold air, 14*, sticky radials, but also subs. Do they make Lt1 SS's? Maybe the guy put the emblems on there?
Click to expand...

Yes they do make an LT1 SS
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
930
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
M
New from North Texas
  • MFReeves
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
9
Views
530
The Welcome Wagon Sep 22, 2025
nickyb
P
Progress Thread New To Me 1988 GT - trying to set up vacuum lines for upper intake question
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 28, 2026
pindude80
P
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
567
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?