• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech

Powerhouse Turbo Installed!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter rygenstormlocke
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

rygenstormlocke

former 10 second badass
Aug 13, 2005
698
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 23, 2006
#21
  • May 23, 2006
  • #21
If the drone is as bad or worse than my magnapacks, then it isn't worth it.
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
May 23, 2006
#22
  • May 23, 2006
  • #22
rygenstormlocke said:
If the drone is as bad or worse than my magnapacks, then it isn't worth it.
Click to expand...

oh... come on... what's a little drone... you shouldn't be talking on the cellphone while you're driving anyways! LOL!
 

JTGrant

New Member
Aug 2, 2005
775
0
0
GA
May 23, 2006
#23
  • May 23, 2006
  • #23
on a turbo car a heat shield on the CAI really won't do much.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
May 23, 2006
#24
  • May 23, 2006
  • #24
do you have any pics of how the turbo is run off the manifolds?
 

Blandnuts

I don't swallow; I only swoosh
Founding Member
Aug 21, 2000
1,172
124
124
FloorDuh
May 23, 2006
#25
  • May 23, 2006
  • #25
Lucky fockers ....Now lets see some track times
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 24, 2006
#26
  • May 24, 2006
  • #26
turbofreek said:
you know you can pick up even more power withut a tune change by ditching those mufflers. get a strait through none chamber muffler. and congrats on the turbo they are sweet arnt they
Click to expand...

I tried the MRTs but got a wicked drone and a fart noise at a certain RPMs because of the LTs I had on. I thought about the SLP liudmouths, but wasn't pushing enough power and was afraid that they would sund crappy on a 6. And as it stands, even with the chambered JBAs (which are pretty smooth sounding), I set off car alarms when I parrallel park...

What would you recommend? I am going to enjoy the JBAs for awhile, but do you think the SLPs would do the trick?
 

rygenstormlocke

former 10 second badass
Aug 13, 2005
698
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 24, 2006
#27
  • May 24, 2006
  • #27
Well, the Flowmaster American Thunders are on the Powerhouse car, at least I saw them on the GT. So that is good enough for me.
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
May 24, 2006
#28
  • May 24, 2006
  • #28
Excepcion13 said:
I tried the MRTs but got a wicked drone and a fart noise at a certain RPMs because of the LTs I had on. I thought about the SLP liudmouths, but wasn't pushing enough power and was afraid that they would sund crappy on a 6. And as it stands, even with the chambered JBAs (which are pretty smooth sounding), I set off car alarms when I parrallel park...

What would you recommend? I am going to enjoy the JBAs for awhile, but do you think the SLPs would do the trick?
Click to expand...

Scott from MRT was telling me they have some new resonators that gets rid of the drone (or at least a majority of it..)
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 24, 2006
#29
  • May 24, 2006
  • #29
scrming said:
Scott from MRT was telling me they have some new resonators that gets rid of the drone (or at least a majority of it..)
Click to expand...

You know, the drone never really bothered me too much, but that fart noise caused by a weird resonance at 2800-3000RPMs attributable to my LT headers was unbearable. And embarrassing. NOT MRT's fault, just a peculiarity of my specific set-up. I wonder if the resonators would have sorted that out? I was just loathe to shell out even more money and time on resonators and work after the fact and just sold them and got the JBAs

But I do really like these JBAs. On duals they remind me of how the single MRT sounds on your car. And they really smooth out the raspiness of the turbo. Now the exhaust note is very muscular but smooth... I will try to get Todd to get a clip.
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
May 24, 2006
#30
  • May 24, 2006
  • #30
Excepcion13 said:
You know, the drone never really bothered me too much, but that fart noise caused by a weird resonance at 2800-3000RPMs attributable to my LT headers was unbearable. And embarrassing. NOT MRT's fault, just a peculiarity of my specific set-up. I wonder if the resonators would have sorted that out? I was just loathe to shell out even more money and time on resonators and work after the fact and just sold them and got the JBAs

But I do really like these JBAs. On duals they remind me of how the single MRT sounds on your car. And they really smooth out the raspiness of the turbo. Now the exhaust note is very muscular but smooth... I will try to get Todd to get a clip.
Click to expand...

hmmm... wonder what a single MRT would sound like with stock exhaust system and some kind of FI... hmmmmmmmm
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 24, 2006
#31
  • May 24, 2006
  • #31
scrming said:
hmmm... wonder what a single MRT would sound like with stock exhaust system and some kind of FI... hmmmmmmmm
Click to expand...

In a word: MEAN!!!
 

turbofreek

New Member
May 11, 2006
16
0
0
illinois
May 24, 2006
#32
  • May 24, 2006
  • #32
dynomax's ultra's the oval ones that look like a regular muffler but are a strait through type of muffler. sounds are similar to a chamber muffler but can cancel out the drown your refering to. not in all systems but in some cases they get rid of the drown. but i will tell you that drone is there on all cars just sometimes its noticable more than others. may have to do with tip location or length of strait pipe before it ends at the back. fyi
 
T

The Fang

Member
Sep 11, 2005
602
0
16
Tallahassee Fl
May 24, 2006
#33
  • May 24, 2006
  • #33
Well u guys definatly got the meanest 6'rs now. thats kewl!!!!
 
M

mattzts

Member
Jun 27, 2005
160
0
16
clifton, nj
May 25, 2006
#34
  • May 25, 2006
  • #34
only 8psi why? is that just for now for break in purposes? i mean i have a 97 eclipse that runs 10-12 psi stock. with a bigger turbo and fmic can handle 20 or more psi. what size turbo is that anyway?
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 25, 2006
#35
  • May 25, 2006
  • #35
mattzts said:
only 8psi why? is that just for now for break in purposes? i mean i have a 97 eclipse that runs 10-12 psi stock. with a bigger turbo and fmic can handle 20 or more psi. what size turbo is that anyway?
Click to expand...

Mine is running 9.2-9.5 PSI and I have a spring that I can switch out if I want to make 11-12 PSI. The springs can be combined to make around 20PSI. Basically, we are both looking to run safe levels first. We do not have forged internals, and pushing these cars too hard can result in piston damage. So until I decide on upgrading the internals, I am going to do this for a while and then switch to the other spring.

Besides, the 7.5 rear-end may not be able to handle much more. I have TrueTrac and girdle, but 400RWHP may be the limit for that set-up. The Powerhouse V6 is now running more boost (15 I think), but they have an 8.8 rear-end.

The Turbo is a Precision PT61. More details here: http://www.nolimitmotorsport.com/precision-turbo/turbos.html?T4-Race
 

scrming

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
476
2
0
May 25, 2006
#36
  • May 25, 2006
  • #36
Excepcion13 said:
Mine is running 9.2-9.5 PSI and I have a spring that I can switch out if I want to make 11-12 PSI. The springs can be combined to make around 20PSI. Basically, we are both looking to run safe levels first. We do not have forged internals, and pushing these cars too hard can result in piston damage. So until I decide on upgrading the internals, I am going to do this for a while and then switch to the other spring.

Besides, the 7.5 rear-end may not be able to handle much more. I have TrueTrac and girdle, but 400RWHP may be the limit for that set-up. The Powerhouse V6 is now running more boost (15 I think), but they have an 8.8 rear-end.

The Turbo is a Precision PT61. More details here: http://www.nolimitmotorsport.com/precision-turbo/turbos.html?T4-Race
Click to expand...


and our 4.0L's are a high compression motor... not the best for boost... LOL!
 

Excepcion13

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
215
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 25, 2006
#37
  • May 25, 2006
  • #37
scrming said:
and our 4.0L's are a high compression motor... not the best for boost... LOL!
Click to expand...

True. If I go any higher past the 11-12 mark, I will have to seriously consider adding the dished pistons and stronger wristpins. I am just wondering what the install cost on that would be...

What is Lidio's take on all of the FI out there? What does he consider safe levels, etc.
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
May 25, 2006
#38
  • May 25, 2006
  • #38
i thought the V6 comes with forged internals, but the GT has cracked powder rods?
 
J

Jimp

New Member
Apr 9, 2005
486
0
0
May 25, 2006
#39
  • May 25, 2006
  • #39
bigcat said:
i thought the V6 comes with forged internals, but the GT has cracked powder rods?
Click to expand...

They both have hypertectic pistons.
 

rygenstormlocke

former 10 second badass
Aug 13, 2005
698
0
0
Northern Virginia
May 26, 2006
#40
  • May 26, 2006
  • #40
scrming said:
hmmm... wonder what a single MRT would sound like with stock exhaust system and some kind of FI... hmmmmmmmm
Click to expand...


I wonder too.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
338
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
890
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?