• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Quickest mods to beat LS1!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevinj84
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 5 of 7 Next Last

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Jan 18, 2009
#81
  • Jan 18, 2009
  • #81
Search feature This topic has been beaten to death...lol
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 18, 2009
#82
  • Jan 18, 2009
  • #82
NitroDuck said:
It's nice to see some reality being injected into this thread as of late. I've resisted posting several times, because it was just complete nonsense.

No 2V GT is going to outrun an LS1 ANYTHING in bolt-on form. I don't care if it's M6or auto.

The auto/M6 LS1 F-bodies are rocketships, and their GTO counterparts are heavy but also extremely stout.

People who beat LS1s in their mildly modified GTs are facing terrible drivers, simply put. You can't possibly scientifically analyze a situation where a bolt-on GT beats an LS1 and not pin the causation on either LS1 Driver Error, or some other external variable (LS1 driver's engine exploded, he was racing on the grass shoulder, he was racing in Low Earth Orbit.)

These are low 13 second cars with the right driver, STOCK. 300rwhp STOCK. I've seen it with my own eyes.

I'm not as well versed with the LS1 GTOs, but I know this. Stock M6 GTOs in LS1 form run low 13's STOCK. Traction, a few cheap mods, and some track time = high 12's. The automatic GTOs are just as quick as the M6 cars, just like the F-bodies were.

My 4.10 geared 250rwhp '98 GT could holeshot the living ish out of my brother's stock 300rwhp '99 Z28 M6. I had him all the way through 1st gear (3.37 1st gear and 4.10s tend to do that, when you're not sliding sideways from lack of traction.) Once he rowed through 2nd and 3rd, it was over. There is no "lead to be held" against an LS1. Given open blacktop and functioning motor skills, an LS1 driver will mow down a GT, simply because they've got enough power to compensate for their relatively soft launching abilities.

Don't throw factoids my way like "Bolt-on GTs run 12s" and "Blah Blah this and that." I'm aware of what a bolt-on GT can do, at the track, with stickies and some gearing (and a great driver.) But comparing apples to apples, in a street contest, with all the variables, on street meats? My money goes on the LS1.

Unless you've got numbers, any street war story is anecdotal.
Click to expand...





my car back when it had a 4.6 had no prayer against ANY ls-1. i only raced a few because it was futile. my car had a PI head/cam/intake swap, filter,off-road 'x', longtubes. it was a 290flywheelhp car. the few times i fooled with an LS-1 it was over by 80mph from a 60 roll. they were at least 3 cars ahead and 5-10mph and pulling. .



one thing i look forward to is killing as many LS cars as i can with the new motor. oh, you'll see the odd FI Ls, but otherwise i cant wait to meet the better cammed LS cars. rock on turbo ported 4V ford.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Jan 18, 2009
#83
  • Jan 18, 2009
  • #83
BTW at 2900lbs/500 rwhp i will enjoy an advantage
 
E

efladage7152

New Member
Sep 1, 2009
0
0
0
AZ
Sep 3, 2009
#84
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • #84
intake(Cold Air and throttle body), exhaust, 4.10 gears....ur set =))
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Sep 3, 2009
#85
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • #85
efladage7152 said:
intake(Cold Air and throttle body), exhaust, 4.10 gears....ur set =))
Click to expand...
You bumped this thread for this nonsense?
Wow
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Sep 3, 2009
#86
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • #86
CobraRed_96_GT said:
You bumped this thread for this nonsense?
Wow
Click to expand...

yeah...seriously?

i still havent lined up next to a ls1
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Sep 3, 2009
#87
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • #87
98COBRA281 said:
yeah...seriously?

i still havent lined up next to a ls1
Click to expand...
From a launch (with the built auto) i took one twice in the 1/8th. From a roll or 1/4 i'm not even sure - but he had a few bolt ons too.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Sep 3, 2009
#88
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • #88
CobraRed_96_GT said:
From a launch (with the built auto) i took one twice in the 1/8th. From a roll or 1/4 i'm not even sure - but he had a few bolt ons too.
Click to expand...

whats your cars 1/8 and 1/4? & mph?, im dying to get back to the track with the 4.30s and slicks.......
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Sep 3, 2009
#89
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • #89
I've raced 2 different LS1 GTO's (both auto).

GTO w/ SLP catback - I got a 1/2 car jump and held it through 110.

GTO w/ unkown mods - dead even through 95.

GTO's are not as quick as you may think.
 
S

Stangdriver13

Member
Jul 31, 2006
44
0
6
Sep 4, 2009
#90
  • Sep 4, 2009
  • #90
VEE EIGHT said:
I've raced 2 different LS1 GTO's (both auto).

GTO w/ SLP catback - I got a 1/2 car jump and held it through 110.

GTO w/ unkown mods - dead even through 95.

GTO's are not as quick as you may think.
Click to expand...

Correction LS1 goats are not a quick as you might think, LS2's are a whole other ball game

My buddy has a 05 goat and its got some balls but I called him out to go the track with me and he won't so who knows. With my mach, I would say driver's race, I would win at a dig he would win at a roll.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Sep 4, 2009
#91
  • Sep 4, 2009
  • #91
Stangdriver13 said:
Correction LS1 goats are not a quick as you might think, LS2's are a whole other ball game

My buddy has a 05 goat and its got some balls but I called him out to go the track with me and he won't so who knows. With my mach, I would say driver's race, I would win at a dig he would win at a roll.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I meant to say that LS1 GTO's are dogs.

I want to add that all I had when I raced the two I mentioned were the mods in my sig (K&N FIPK and flows......thats it). I also want to add that Im an auto too.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Sep 4, 2009
#92
  • Sep 4, 2009
  • #92
There will always be someone faster, be a man when you get your new Mustang and take the high road when asshats line up to test their POS cars against the standard (your Mustang). Do not be an immature boy and throw mods at your car just to win a stupid street race.
 
S

SONIC 4.6

New Member
Mar 18, 2009
15
0
0
Sep 4, 2009
#93
  • Sep 4, 2009
  • #93
Wasnt the auto new edge GTs rated at like 15.1 at 93 mph by car and driver, enough said.
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Sep 4, 2009
#94
  • Sep 4, 2009
  • #94
SONIC 4.6 said:
Wasnt the auto new edge GTs rated at like 15.1 at 93 mph by car and driver, enough said.
Click to expand...

LOL is this guy serious?

 
S

SONIC 4.6

New Member
Mar 18, 2009
15
0
0
Sep 4, 2009
#95
  • Sep 4, 2009
  • #95
For a auto....anyways. Im sure the car and driver people didnt muster the most out of it but still, auto gts 99-04 typicaly run high 14's stock. Its a OLD article but I found it a while back. Could of even been Motor Trend, dont quote me. Didnt say I liked it, just what I read.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Sep 5, 2009
#96
  • Sep 5, 2009
  • #96
efladage7152 said:
intake(Cold Air and throttle body), exhaust, 4.10 gears....ur set =))
Click to expand...

Bringing back from the dead eh?

Also not exactly on those mods. They might beat a poor driver, but not a decent one with a strong car.

SONIC 4.6 said:
Wasnt the auto new edge GTs rated at like 15.1 at 93 mph by car and driver, enough said.
Click to expand...
I suggest you spend a lot more time at a dragstrip than reading magazine times from the ****tiest drivers.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Sep 5, 2009
#97
  • Sep 5, 2009
  • #97
turbo it and laugh at them.
 

85 Coupe 5.0

Founding Member
Dec 18, 2001
817
2
16
Kansas
Oct 30, 2011
#98
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #98
My solution to this problem.....was a little more eccentric.....




As you can tell i'm still a Mustang freak, but love the dirt cheap LS horsepower. 600 RWHP on a 3050lb Fox Body is a great time to say the least.

Liking the new 5.0L though, lots of potential there it looks like. Once they've been out for a while I could see a change back happening...
 

bradfier

Member
Mar 2, 2010
142
0
16
Oct 30, 2011
#99
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #99
85 Coupe 5.0 - Nicely done sir!
 

mransr

Founding Member
Nov 3, 2000
1,188
36
98
Riverside, SoCal
Oct 30, 2011
#100
  • Oct 30, 2011
  • #100
um...isn't that an LS in that coupe?

personally I'd rather see it in an late 70s/early 80's Camaro (or a Vega )than in a Mustang, but that's me


BTW nice job bringing back a necro-thread for Halloween
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 5 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
667
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
807
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Z
Progress Thread zeth194 - New Guy on the Block
  • zeth194
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
523
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 26, 2026
LILCBRA
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
771
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?