• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

RACED AN OLDER STANG

  • Thread starter Thread starter whiteyford0212
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
W

whiteyford0212

New Member
Sep 21, 2004
24
0
0
Nov 11, 2004
#1
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #1
Im not so much here to tell everyone about a little race with words..me and an older mustang were messin w/ eachother on a road last night..i thought it might of been kinda slow but that sumbitch was fast!..it was definitely a fastback looked like late 60's but real clean and stock on the outside..do they come w/ 289's or 351's..also can u work those 289 motors like a 302?

if it helps the back was real long and had those slits kinda behind the driver/passenger windows? are they fast like that out of the factory or u think it mighta been worked
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Nov 11, 2004
#2
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #2
this all depends on what car u have lol if u have a honda or something.but yes, 289's cna be worked just like 302's there are 289's making 400+ hp.....you just never know, and by the description that was a fastback and should have come with a 289 factory
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Nov 11, 2004
#3
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #3
It was fast, because it was a fastback. They were relatively slow by today's standards.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 11, 2004
#4
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #4
Judging by your description it was a 67/68 fastback. The 65/66 fastbacks did not go all the way back and had "big slits" instead of little ones. 69/70 Mustang fastbacks (sic) did not have slits at all.

67 fastbacks could have a 200cid 6 cylinder, any one of 3 different 289s, or a 390 in front of a 3 speed manual/auto or 4 spd manual in the case of a V8.

68s had almost the same except for the introduction of the 302 that replaced the 289s that year and the 428 Cobra Jet. The 428 is quite fast even by today's standards in the rolling start racing that you describe.
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Nov 11, 2004
#5
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #5
He may have been easily impresseed if he were in a VW bug. I was speak generally about the masses, and not a 428, Boss, CJ rocket sled or anything else out or the norm.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Nov 11, 2004
#6
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #6
All classic mustangs are just slow secrataries cars and there is no way to make them fast
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Nov 11, 2004
#7
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #7
gp001 said:
All classic mustangs are just slow secrataries cars and there is no way to make them fast
Click to expand...


Most were by today's standards, but they can be made faster than stock with a little help.


My 3.1 buick could take most unmolested models.
 
W

whiteyford0212

New Member
Sep 21, 2004
24
0
0
Nov 11, 2004
#8
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #8
well i guess this guy had his worked somewhat..i have a 93 5.0 w/ some bolt-ons..its not the fastest in the world but its capable of high 13's. either way it was a beautiful car and i was surprised when we both punched it he was pulling on me..i want one too!!
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 11, 2004
#9
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #9
Weight has a lot to do with it.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Nov 11, 2004
#10
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #10
It's also very easy to slide a 351 with a stroker kit in there. No tellin what the guy had.
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Nov 11, 2004
#11
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #11
WOW 13's are so fast.

Don't you need a 10 point tigged nhra accepted cage when you go that fast.
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Nov 11, 2004
#12
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #12
Don't you need a 10 point tigged nhra accepted cage when you go that fast.
Click to expand...

LMAO
 
V

VictorII

New Member
Jun 19, 2004
148
1
0
Cotati, CA
Nov 12, 2004
#13
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #13
gp001 said:
All classic mustangs are just slow secrataries cars and there is no way to make them fast
Click to expand...

Uh huh...guess that secretary would love my high 13s '65 convert. Course it ain't stock..turns quick too. That isn't stock either..love messin' with these things!
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Nov 12, 2004
#14
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #14
VictorII said:
Uh huh...guess that secretary would love my high 13s '65 convert. Course it ain't stock..turns quick too. That isn't stock either..love messin' with these things!
Click to expand...

I don't believe it. Next your gonna try tellin me these things can easily have 340 rwhp, 4 wheel power brakes, and 6 speed transmissions. NO WAY!!!
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Nov 12, 2004
#15
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #15
gp001 said:
I don't believe it. Next your gonna try tellin me these things can easily have 340 rwhp, 4 wheel power brakes, and 6 speed transmissions. NO WAY!!!
Click to expand...



Believe it. Miracles can happen.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 12, 2004
#16
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #16
Ozsum2 said:
Believe it. Miracles can happen.
Click to expand...
But most of them are primer-black 6-cyl 3-speeds.
 
3

390Fe

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
236
0
0
Pottstown PA
Nov 12, 2004
#17
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #17
And some of them are primer black 390 4-spds .
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Nov 12, 2004
#18
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #18
390Fe said:
And some of them are primer black 390 4-spds .
Click to expand...

Ya, but don't those pivot on the front wheels when you turn???
 
3

390Fe

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
236
0
0
Pottstown PA
Nov 12, 2004
#19
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #19
Only on wet roads when you want to see what's behind you without using the rear view mirror
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Nov 12, 2004
#20
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #20
LOL, and some of them are primer gray 393 strokers.

Here kitty kitty kitty....
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
New here, just saying hi.
  • Tank Mechanic
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
167
The Welcome Wagon Nov 2, 2025
nickyb
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
577
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Progress Thread Cobra II Resurrection
  • welder4956
  • Mar 16, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Apr 25, 2026
welder4956
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?