Don't get caught up in the NUMBERS on those graphs; but the general shape is a very accurate representation. Peak torque values will be highest on the turbo, flattest torque curve from the positive displacement.
As my project 66 is not operational, I cannot give you an opinion for that specific setup [KB @ 12psi, 331 forged/sportsman block, AFR 185's, cam, methanol] but I wanted that instant "smack you back in your seat" torque. Hope to be driving the car in '06.
My '05 GTO has been an interesting project. With a rear-mount turbo, it has a tad more lag than a front mount, but that is a car that STOCK puts ~350hp to the rear wheels [although the car does weigh ~3800+ lbs]. The midrange pull in 2nd-4th gears is just unreal w/ ~500 rwhp. STS made me a deal that was too good to say 'no' to in order to get the first '05 car done. KB STILL hasn't got their promised LS1 kit out. The ATI Procharger cars are certainly making some righteous power on the LSx engines, with better throttle response and power @ 2500...but no where near the torque or midrange.
I go back and forth as to what kind of engine I will build for my 65. I really like the idea of the 408/427/460 Windsor...WITH a power adder. I just want to reduce the weight on the front of the car [hence my 'semi-serious' thread on an LSx swap]...and a Dart 351W block IS HEAVY!!! Add a turbo/blower on the front end of the car, and it is even more of an issue. Maybe build a Dart 8.2 block with a REAR mount turbo for it!!!
Personally, I cannot imagine running an old style roots with the thing sticking out of the hood...just too much [although I love my little model '65 Shelby with the HUMUNGOUS blower sitting on the shelf!].
And keep up the work on the blow-through cars. I am intrigued by the simplicity and NOT needing a zillion feet of wires and the issues of efi setup.