• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Sanity check

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jester67
  • Start date Start date Oct 22, 2004

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 22, 2004
#1
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #1
I am in the process of upgrading my suspension on my car and was looking for a sanity check of sorts.
Here is the list
GW upper control arms
New stock lowers with rubber bushing
1” sway bar with graphite poly bushings
New tie rods see other thread
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthre...644#post4681644
GW strut rod bushing “or should I go with one of the aftermarket ones strut rods”
Graphite poly rag joint
New graphite poly spring seat do I need poly here “ use old parts to try opentracks design”
Moog idler arm
Progressive springs
Poly spring bushing
4.5 leaf mid eye rear springs graphite poly front and rear
Heaver shackles
KYB shocks all around
16X8 rims

Have I left any thing out, should I change something? Any input will be appreciated.

 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 22, 2004
#2
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #2
No thoughts?
 
S

streetgrande69

Founding Member
Nov 2, 2002
976
0
16
Splendora, Tx
Oct 22, 2004
#3
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #3
Jester67 said:
No thoughts?
Click to expand...
sure, i got a few, go with 17" wheels

Here is the list
GW upper control arms........why? what advantage are you going for by using these?

New stock lowers with rubber bushing do the opentracker spericical mod

1” sway bar with graphite poly bushings sounds good

New tie rods see other thread go with stock unless you are currently experiacning and have a home means of measuring bump-steer

GW strut rod bushing “or should I go with one of the aftermarket ones strut rods” use the street or track units(much better customer support!)

Graphite poly rag joint Ok
New graphite poly spring seat do I need poly here “ use old parts to try opentracks design”
Moog idler arm ok
Progressive springs ok
Poly spring bushing ok
4.5 leaf mid eye rear springs graphite poly front and rear ok
Heaver shackles ok
KYB shocks all around id go with the edelbrock eas, but thats just me
16X8 rims go for 17 x8s on all 4

Have I left any thing out, should I change something? Any input will be appreciated.
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 24, 2004
#4
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #4
Streetgrande69
Thanks for the input anyone else?
 
S

Snail50

Founding Member
Mar 24, 2001
787
0
0
Miami
Oct 24, 2004
#5
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #5
I also recommend 17x8" wheels. They will help you clear a wider variety of disc brakes. For instance, 16" TTIIs will not clear the Baer brake setup I have; 17" is the minimum for clearance.

Does your 67 have a rag joint? If so, then it must have been built late in the model year, because if I'm not mistaken, early to mid-year 67s don't have rag joints.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Oct 24, 2004
#6
  • Oct 24, 2004
  • #6
i think sg69 nailed pretty much everything on the head there, although i would wait until absolutely everything else is done before deciding on tie-rods until you have the rest of the suspension done, that way if you do find you have bumpsteer you can add the beartrackers at that time, this is provided your current tie-rods are in decent shape, alternately pro-motorsports has a bumpsteer kit that uses the stock tie-rods and also moves the mouting point of the tie-rod to a better location, which is good if you are using granada spindles.
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 26, 2004
#7
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #7
streetgrande69 said:
sure, i got a few, go with 17" wheels

Here is the list
1 GW upper control arms........why? what advantage are you going for by using these?

2 New stock lowers with rubber bushing do the opentracker spericical mod

3 1” sway bar with graphite poly bushings sounds good

4 New tie rods see other thread go with stock unless you are currently experiacning and have a home means of measuring bump-steer


5 GW strut rod bushing “or should I go with one of the aftermarket ones strut rods” use the street or track units(much better customer support!)

6 Graphite poly rag joint Ok
7 New graphite poly spring seat do I need poly here “ use old parts to try opentracks design”
8 Moog idler arm ok
9 Progressive springs ok
10 Poly spring bushing ok
11 4.5 leaf mid eye rear springs graphite poly front and rear ok
12 Heaver shackles ok
13 KYB shocks all around id go with the edelbrock eas, but thats just me
14 16X8 rims go for 17 x8s on all 4

Have I left any thing out, should I change something? Any input will be appreciated.
Click to expand...

Stupid question: what does 17” wheels get me other than bigger brakes? I’m not a big fan of all rim and no tire sidewall. But if it is that better handling I might consider it.

1 I need UCA anyway and was going to go with the PMS wedge kit but it does not add that much to go all out.

2 I would like to see more road time on these first I might in the future. On offince John.

5 Is that for the bushing or the aftermarket rod?

7 I will modify the ones that come off and try this. Can you change the spring seat with out messing up the alignment?

I hope I got those numbered correctly.

Thanks everyone.

P.S. She was made on August 17 1967
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Oct 26, 2004
#8
  • Oct 26, 2004
  • #8
Bigger rims will help in cornering. Less sidewall means less tire roll in the corners as well...

I'm not a big fan of the GW uppers. Mainly because if you are going with high end tubular arms, they might as well be adjustable.

The NWK is a lot better of a mod then you are thinking. It works great on a new stock style set of uppers. Not too tough to make them stronger.

I'm for the Koni's on the shocks!!!
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 28, 2004
#9
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #9
mdjay said:
Bigger rims will help in cornering. Less sidewall means less tire roll in the corners as well...

I'm not a big fan of the GW uppers. Mainly because if you are going with high end tubular arms, they might as well be adjustable.

The NWK is a lot better of a mod then you are thinking. It works great on a new stock style set of uppers. Not too tough to make them stronger.

I'm for the Koni's on the shocks!!!
Click to expand...
NWK??
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Oct 28, 2004
#10
  • Oct 28, 2004
  • #10
Negative Wedge Kit
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
609
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
After a decade, I am no longer Stangless!
  • Jsmiley
  • May 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2024
manicmechanic007
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?