• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Progress Thread Seriously? Another Boosted Coyote Swap Build? - Still Slowly Moving Forward

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hoytster
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2017
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 16
Next
First Prev 6 of 16 Next Last

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 3, 2018
#101
  • Jan 3, 2018
  • #101
Huh...with such a serious effort chassis, I would've figured drag car...but since you're installing an IRS, that isn't the case...did you say earlier that you intended track duty for this car?
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Jan 3, 2018
#102
  • Jan 3, 2018
  • #102
madmike1157 said:
Huh...with such a serious effort chassis, I would've figured drag car...but since you're installing an IRS, that isn't the case...did you say earlier that you intended track duty for this car?
Click to expand...

Yeah, my original intention for this car is being able to open track/road race it once in awhile. It will see the drag course probably just for the occasional grudge night, but my true passion is in corner carving. I believe a stiff chassis is just as important, if not more, in road racing. Plus, I'm trying to build as much safety into the car without a full cage since I believe a full cage can cause more damage than not to a person on the street. You don't normally wear a helmet and fully suit up for a sunday drive . Smacking your head on a padded bar with a helmet on hurts enough as it is in an accident, I couldn't imagine what would happen without a helmet.

I don't want to hit anything obviously, but if I do, at least it won't be on a stock, spot welded sheet metal chassis. I see the potential to be hitting close to 170+ on some of the straights I race on with my motor goals. I'm already touching 125 at NJMP with our stock ~160HP engine, stock suspension E30. I used to hit 145+ with my 95' N/A 302 cobra.

The IRS just kind of happened. I was originally planning on a watts link/TA SRA setup, but decided to try this instead. I've heard some good things.
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Jan 3, 2018
#103
  • Jan 3, 2018
  • #103
Hoytster said:
Yeah, my original intention for this car is being able to open track/road race it once in awhile. It will see the drag course probably just for the occasional grudge night, but my true passion is in corner carving. I believe a stiff chassis is just as important, if not more, in road racing. Plus, I'm trying to build as much safety into the car without a full cage since I believe a full cage can cause more damage than not to a person on the street. You don't normally wear a helmet and fully suit up for a sunday drive . Smacking your head on a padded bar with a helmet on hurts enough as it is in an accident, I couldn't imagine what would happen without a helmet.

I don't want to hit anything obviously, but if I do, at least it won't be on a stock, spot welded sheet metal chassis. I see the potential to be hitting close to 170+ on some of the straights I race on with my motor goals. I'm already touching 125 at NJMP with our stock ~160HP engine, stock suspension E30. I used to hit 145+ with my 95' N/A 302 cobra.

The IRS just kind of happened. I was originally planning on a watts link/TA SRA setup, but decided to try this instead. I've heard some good things.
Click to expand...
The good things heard can be from people that sell parts for IRS and the bad things (long list) about IRS can be heard from people that DON'T sell IRS products (like Griggs). I've read up on FTBR about how great IRS is when it's weak points are addressed and how predictable they are in the turns especially when hitting the curb. I am still debating doing the hard tail conversion myself. Maybe next winter
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,945
5,816
213
Jan 3, 2018
#104
  • Jan 3, 2018
  • #104
The hard tail conversion is the way to go. When people first started modifying them on cobras they would flatten the rear cradle tubes and weld a flat plate that allowed it to be directly bolted to the side of the rear frame rails.

That didn't work out well because that single plate wasn't enough support. " They then changed it to an angle that would allow bolting from the side and bottom.

The issue has been documented that IRS lower control arms flex with hard acceleration....and has been attributed to cause wheel hop. ( there was a video a few years ago that showed it ). Kenny Brown used to make tubular lower control arms that helped the issue. ( haven't seen them in years ). I've never seen the lower control arms break. My buddy runs consistent 10s with his cobra IRS.

Just FYI....the mid 90s Thunderbird V8 came with a factory cast iron center section just like the cobras aluminum one.
It also is an upgrade to the aluminum one found in the cobra. Under power the whole case can flex....the thunder bird still had an aluminum front cover.. So, a brace is still needed.

The debate is still out over the full Ford Racing cover vs. the metal brace. I chose the brace because the full cover has been noted to have fitment problems.

I researched a lot over the years and still do installs for local people. Its good seeing people doing this swap.

I love taking on and off ramps with IRS. The handling on the street is really nice compared to an SLA. On the road course the IRS tends to snap coming out of turns. That has given it unpredictable status. Our rears are sensitive to the geometry of the body of the car...meaning, as the body rolls and pitches it affects the direction of the rear tire ( bump steer ). That is true even when loaded and unloaded...like tire spin. The rear feels like its loose and most people try to correct steering....resulting in over or under steer. People tend to over come this by toeing the rear wheels out a tad. ( when the suspension compresses it pulls the toe back in )

There are drawbacks....but if you are a skilled driver....they can be overcome.
 
Reactions: Hoytster, krazedstang and 02 281 GT

02 281 GT

Agreed...My wife has great Boobs
15 Year Member
Feb 3, 2009
3,208
1,972
194
Cabot, AR
Jan 4, 2018
#105
  • Jan 4, 2018
  • #105
90sickfox said:
The hard tail conversion is the way to go. When people first started modifying them on cobras they would flatten the rear cradle tubes and weld a flat plate that allowed it to be directly bolted to the side of the rear frame rails.

That didn't work out well because that single plate wasn't enough support. " They then changed it to an angle that would allow bolting from the side and bottom.

The issue has been documented that IRS lower control arms flex with hard acceleration....and has been attributed to cause wheel hop. ( there was a video a few years ago that showed it ). Kenny Brown used to make tubular lower control arms that helped the issue. ( haven't seen them in years ). I've never seen the lower control arms break. My buddy runs consistent 10s with his cobra IRS.

Just FYI....the mid 90s Thunderbird V8 came with a factory cast iron center section just like the cobras aluminum one.
It also is an upgrade to the aluminum one found in the cobra. Under power the whole case can flex....the thunder bird still had an aluminum front cover.. So, a brace is still needed.

The debate is still out over the full Ford Racing cover vs. the metal brace. I chose the brace because the full cover has been noted to have fitment problems.

I researched a lot over the years and still do installs for local people. Its good seeing people doing this swap.

I love taking on and off ramps with IRS. The handling on the street is really nice compared to an SLA. On the road course the IRS tends to snap coming out of turns. That has given it unpredictable status. Our rears are sensitive to the geometry of the body of the car...meaning, as the body rolls and pitches it affects the direction of the rear tire ( bump steer ). That is true even when loaded and unloaded...like tire spin. The rear feels like its loose and most people try to correct steering....resulting in over or under steer. People tend to over come this by toeing the rear wheels out a tad. ( when the suspension compresses it pulls the toe back in )

There are drawbacks....but if you are a skilled driver....they can be overcome.
Click to expand...

I like the picture you're painting here. A car that has a modern suspension, can handle well, but still needs a skilled driver as there is no fancy traction control. Sounds like a lot of fun.

Stick that in your M5 and smoke it.
 
Reactions: krazedstang, Hoytster, 90sickfox and 2 others

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,134
21,305
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 4, 2018
#106
  • Jan 4, 2018
  • #106
02 281 GT said:
Stick that in your M5 and smoke it.
Click to expand...

*cough* functional cup holder *cough*
 
Reactions: General karthief

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Jan 4, 2018
#107
  • Jan 4, 2018
  • #107
90sickfox said:
The hard tail conversion is the way to go. When people first started modifying them on cobras they would flatten the rear cradle tubes and weld a flat plate that allowed it to be directly bolted to the side of the rear frame rails.

That didn't work out well because that single plate wasn't enough support. " They then changed it to an angle that would allow bolting from the side and bottom.

The issue has been documented that IRS lower control arms flex with hard acceleration....and has been attributed to cause wheel hop. ( there was a video a few years ago that showed it ). Kenny Brown used to make tubular lower control arms that helped the issue. ( haven't seen them in years ). I've never seen the lower control arms break. My buddy runs consistent 10s with his cobra IRS.

Just FYI....the mid 90s Thunderbird V8 came with a factory cast iron center section just like the cobras aluminum one.
It also is an upgrade to the aluminum one found in the cobra. Under power the whole case can flex....the thunder bird still had an aluminum front cover.. So, a brace is still needed.

The debate is still out over the full Ford Racing cover vs. the metal brace. I chose the brace because the full cover has been noted to have fitment problems.

I researched a lot over the years and still do installs for local people. Its good seeing people doing this swap.

I love taking on and off ramps with IRS. The handling on the street is really nice compared to an SLA. On the road course the IRS tends to snap coming out of turns. That has given it unpredictable status. Our rears are sensitive to the geometry of the body of the car...meaning, as the body rolls and pitches it affects the direction of the rear tire ( bump steer ). That is true even when loaded and unloaded...like tire spin. The rear feels like its loose and most people try to correct steering....resulting in over or under steer. People tend to over come this by toeing the rear wheels out a tad. ( when the suspension compresses it pulls the toe back in )

There are drawbacks....but if you are a skilled driver....they can be overcome.
Click to expand...
I'll add that some of the "rear steer" is attributed to weak tie rods and tie rod ends. Upgrading these to a stronger piece and getting a MM rear steer kit helps eliminate/reduce the amount of rear steer that is the result of hard cornering (tires tow in/out) and hard acceleration (tires tow out). The IRS is very versatile and adjustable and being able to add camber to the rear helps a ton too. Being able to keep one tire planted on the pavement while the other tire hits the curb in a turn helps a lot.

I will soon begin squirreling away IRS parts as I see them up for sale at a decent price. Since nobody makes replacement parts for the IRS the prices will only go up up up!
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 4, 2018
#108
  • Jan 4, 2018
  • #108
02 281 GT said:
I like the picture you're painting here. A car that has a modern suspension, can handle well, but still needs a skilled driver as there is no fancy traction control. Sounds like a lot of fun.

Stick that in your M5 and smoke it.
Click to expand...
They don't make M5's anymore,...(At least not until later this year)

Annnd...You take two drivers with a similar set of limited skills,....put one in a BMW "M anything", and put the other in a non-assisted something else..( No TC, No Stability control, No ABS,...) and have them hot lap a track.

The "smokin" is gonna come from the guy driving the M car.... that is if the other guy even makes it through a full lap w/o running off the track, running slow, or wadding it up against a wall.
 
Reactions: General karthief

02 281 GT

Agreed...My wife has great Boobs
15 Year Member
Feb 3, 2009
3,208
1,972
194
Cabot, AR
Jan 4, 2018
#109
  • Jan 4, 2018
  • #109
CarMichael Angelo said:
They don't make M5's anymore,...(At least not until later this year)

Annnd...You take two drivers with a similar set of limited skills,....put one in a BMW "M anything", and put the other in a non-assisted something else..( No TC, No Stability control, No ABS,...) and have them hot lap a track.

The "smokin" is gonna come from the guy driving the M car.... that is if the other guy even makes it through a full lap w/o running off the track, running slow, or wadding it up against a wall.
Click to expand...

Technicalities.

Hence why I specified "skilled".

I knew I should have just typed "AMG" instead.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Jan 4, 2018
#110
  • Jan 4, 2018
  • #110
02 281 GT said:
Technicalities.

Hence why I specified "skilled".

I knew I should have just typed "AMG" instead.
Click to expand...
It wouldn't have mattered...
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Jan 5, 2018
#111
  • Jan 5, 2018
  • #111
Soooo.... progress yet?
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Jan 7, 2018
#112
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #112
90sickfox said:
The hard tail conversion is the way to go. When people first started modifying them on cobras they would flatten the rear cradle tubes and weld a flat plate that allowed it to be directly bolted to the side of the rear frame rails.

That didn't work out well because that single plate wasn't enough support. " They then changed it to an angle that would allow bolting from the side and bottom.

The issue has been documented that IRS lower control arms flex with hard acceleration....and has been attributed to cause wheel hop. ( there was a video a few years ago that showed it ). Kenny Brown used to make tubular lower control arms that helped the issue. ( haven't seen them in years ). I've never seen the lower control arms break. My buddy runs consistent 10s with his cobra IRS.

Just FYI....the mid 90s Thunderbird V8 came with a factory cast iron center section just like the cobras aluminum one.
It also is an upgrade to the aluminum one found in the cobra. Under power the whole case can flex....the thunder bird still had an aluminum front cover.. So, a brace is still needed.

The debate is still out over the full Ford Racing cover vs. the metal brace. I chose the brace because the full cover has been noted to have fitment problems.

I researched a lot over the years and still do installs for local people. Its good seeing people doing this swap.

I love taking on and off ramps with IRS. The handling on the street is really nice compared to an SLA. On the road course the IRS tends to snap coming out of turns. That has given it unpredictable status. Our rears are sensitive to the geometry of the body of the car...meaning, as the body rolls and pitches it affects the direction of the rear tire ( bump steer ). That is true even when loaded and unloaded...like tire spin. The rear feels like its loose and most people try to correct steering....resulting in over or under steer. People tend to over come this by toeing the rear wheels out a tad. ( when the suspension compresses it pulls the toe back in )

There are drawbacks....but if you are a skilled driver....they can be overcome.
Click to expand...

FoxMustangLvr said:
I'll add that some of the "rear steer" is attributed to weak tie rods and tie rod ends. Upgrading these to a stronger piece and getting a MM rear steer kit helps eliminate/reduce the amount of rear steer that is the result of hard cornering (tires tow in/out) and hard acceleration (tires tow out). The IRS is very versatile and adjustable and being able to add camber to the rear helps a ton too. Being able to keep one tire planted on the pavement while the other tire hits the curb in a turn helps a lot.

I will soon begin squirreling away IRS parts as I see them up for sale at a decent price. Since nobody makes replacement parts for the IRS the prices will only go up up up!
Click to expand...


Awesome info there. Just reinforces that I have much more research to do on this IRS unit before I bolt the whole thing in the car. Luckily I have plenty of time till that happens.
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Jan 7, 2018
#113
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #113
a91what said:
Soooo.... progress yet?
Click to expand...

Nothing of significance since my last post of the sub frames. I've just been working on pulling out the SRA and front suspension/k member and re-supporting the car. After a couple beers, I had that all finished last night. I'm going to start looking into the conversion to hard tail mount the IRS this week since I want to test fit all that before I continue on the chassis reinforcements.

Work got busy (or should I say busier), so I have that to contend with also.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
Jan 7, 2018
#114
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #114
Yeah work always seems to get in the way of the hobby... what a pain
 
Reactions: Hoytster

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jan 7, 2018
#115
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #115
Or kids..
 
Reactions: Hoytster

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Jan 7, 2018
#116
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #116
Or houses. I made a promise to the wifey i would continue on the house renovations this year. It took a back seat last year so i could finish my garage, so I have to keep my promise to her. Luckily shes very patient and understanding of my mustang hobby and knows that will always be my main project.
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jan 7, 2018
#117
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #117
Same here. When I get a few free hours here and there, I'm hanging a door, or installing new molding/casings.

We want a deck, so once the ground thaws I gotta get some footings dug and poured.
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Jan 7, 2018
#118
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #118
Mustang5L5 said:
Same here. When I get a few free hours here and there, I'm hanging a door, or installing new molding/casings.

We want a deck, so once the ground thaws I gotta get some footings dug and poured.
Click to expand...

If all works out, ill be doing the same over the summer.

If you've never used one of those tow behind, one-man post hole diggers, i suggest you check them out. I put in 200 feet fence two years ago and used one, i will never use a two man machine or hand dig more than a couple holes again.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jan 7, 2018
#119
  • Jan 7, 2018
  • #119
Thanks for the tip. That's the sort of equipment I need to look into. I have no intention of hand digging
 

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Jan 12, 2018
#120
  • Jan 12, 2018
  • #120
Been working on the IRS hard tail mount as much as I could this week, which wasn't as much as I wanted. Wife's dad got smacked by a widow maker on Monday so she's been busy with visiting him in the hospital while I've been taking care of everything at home, after long days of work of course. Anyways,

Built a torque box spreader to open the torque boxes up a little. They just needed a little spreading to allow it to slip in easier.



 
Reactions: a91what, Noobz347, RaggedGT and 1 other person
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 16
Next
First Prev 6 of 16 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

82 Gen 1 Coyote Swap AC Questions...
  • thinkfaster
  • Aug 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
375
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
thinkfaster
J
Fox body - godzilla, coyote, or 408w stroker - Best route for budget build?
  • jaygee15
  • Jan 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 30, 2025
2000xp8
Progress Thread 93 LX father son project
  • ZAM93LX
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2025
Scrapla347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
205
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
775
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?