• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

short vs. stock antennae

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangdave
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Oct 15, 2008
#1
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #1
My '08 picks up twice as many stations as any hi-end head unit I've ever had in this area, which leads me to believe that no matter how good your tuner is, the antennae is critical. So, how do the "shorty" antennaes they sell for this car stack up?
Did you pick up more stations with the stock one?
Did u notice more stations with this car like I did?

I actually found a station I had never heard that is now my fave so I don't want to lose it. I listen to mp3's and cd's alot too, but I like the surprise of the radio playlist also.
 

whyask

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
735
1
0
Sacramento
Oct 15, 2008
#2
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #2
I have a shortie and I really didnt notice a differnce between the stocker and the new one ! Im always using my iPOD it was really just the look I went for .
 

gashog

Member
Dec 26, 2006
139
0
16
Fresno, CA
Oct 15, 2008
#3
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #3
I have a shorty on my car and the range is noticeably reduced, I probably have less than half the range that I did before. Just my personal experience.
 

Power4

Member
May 10, 2004
200
0
16
Rochester, NY
Oct 15, 2008
#4
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #4
I have a shorty antenna as well however I don't listen to the radio a lot so I can't for sure tell you if range was reduced for me. You could always just buy one and try it out and if you don't like it put the longer antenna back on. Mine was only like $15 shipped.
 
F

FordTaurusSHO94

Member
Apr 14, 2003
110
0
16
Oct 15, 2008
#5
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #5
I shortened my stock one and didn't notice a difference.
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Oct 15, 2008
#6
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #6
FordTaurusSHO94 said:
I shortened my stock one and didn't notice a difference.
Click to expand...

+1
 
S

STANGmole

Member
Sep 15, 2008
245
1
17
Portland, OR
Oct 15, 2008
#7
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #7
I bought the longer of the two shorty antennas (14" instead of the 8") and notice no difference in FM reception but a huge difference in appearance.

I thought about shortening the existing antenna but I hate the look of it (even if it was shorter).

Keep in mind that the biggest impact on reception might occur if you live outside a large metro area (which I don't) and that I mostly listen to a combination of CD and satellite radio (very little FM listening).
 

dc06gt

New Member
Apr 8, 2008
24
0
0
Jersey
Oct 15, 2008
#8
  • Oct 15, 2008
  • #8
I've got the 8" on mine and look wise you can't beat how the shortys. as for reception I wouldn't know I have yet to listen to am or fm radio in my car and I've had it for over a year
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 16, 2008
#9
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #9
I have the 8" antenna and lost a lot of reception range, but I listen to mostly sat radio and cds anyhow. I mainly wanted the look
 

metroplex

Member
Sep 7, 2003
405
1
16
SE MI
Oct 16, 2008
#10
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #10
Ford should have gone with the in-glass antenna. They went with the whip for cost reduction and 'nostalgia', the same explanation they gave for LED tail lights, hood struts, and the independent rear suspension.
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Oct 16, 2008
#11
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #11
Thx. for the replies; looks like the shorty is a no-go since I want to keep my range.
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Oct 16, 2008
#12
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #12
metroplex said:
Ford should have gone with the in-glass antenna. They went with the whip for cost reduction and 'nostalgia', the same explanation they gave for LED tail lights, hood struts, and the independent rear suspension.
Click to expand...

I agree. However, I wouldn't war IRS or hood struts.
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
Oct 16, 2008
#13
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #13
Hood struts you can keep but I'd definitely would love to have an IRS setup
 

Art161

Member
Sep 26, 2006
130
0
16
San Francisco
Oct 16, 2008
#14
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #14
metroplex said:
Ford should have gone with the in-glass antenna. They went with the whip for cost reduction and 'nostalgia', the same explanation they gave for LED tail lights, hood struts, and the independent rear suspension.
Click to expand...

What would have been really slick is if they had gone for an in-glass antenna for function and had the whip antenna as non-functional for nostalgia. Then you could stick with the stock whip antenna, go for a shorty, or remove the whip antenna entirely and still have the functional in-glass antenna.
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Oct 16, 2008
#15
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #15
Art161 said:
What would have been really slick is if they had gone for an in-glass antenna for function and had the whip antenna as non-functional for nostalgia. Then you could stick with the stock whip antenna, go for a shorty, or remove the whip antenna entirely and still have the functional in-glass antenna.
Click to expand...

And than you'd still have that big ugly plastic crap on your fender. The whole point is to make it smooth and clean.
 

Radman

New Member
Feb 4, 2007
113
0
0
Texas
Oct 16, 2008
#16
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #16
Next thing ya know we will be discussing HP gains of the shorty vs. OEM!!
 
S

STANGmole

Member
Sep 15, 2008
245
1
17
Portland, OR
Oct 16, 2008
#17
  • Oct 16, 2008
  • #17
NastyStang113 said:
And than you'd still have that big ugly plastic crap on your fender. The whole point is to make it smooth and clean.
Click to expand...

FWIW I like the antenna (now that it's a shorty) better than the turd I have sitting on my trunk lid that's pretending to be a satellite antenna My SIRIUS gets terrible reception.


I wouldn't write off the shorty antenna mustangdave unless you absolutely have to get the shortest (8") one...like I said, the 14" seems to get fine reception and looks much better than the stock one (it's STILL half the length of the factory one!).
 

tr7driver

Member
Sep 5, 2006
117
3
19
Illinois
Oct 17, 2008
#18
  • Oct 17, 2008
  • #18
Twin swept back antennas on the trunk deck

For the retro look, how about twin swept back antennas on each side of the trunk lid? Or it that too '57 50's ish....
 

Art161

Member
Sep 26, 2006
130
0
16
San Francisco
Oct 17, 2008
#19
  • Oct 17, 2008
  • #19
NastyStang113 said:
And than you'd still have that big ugly plastic crap on your fender. The whole point is to make it smooth and clean.
Click to expand...

If the antenna were nonfunctional they could design it so you could remove the whole assembly. They could give you a body colored plug to put in its place. Not quite as slick as no antenna at all, but it could look pretty decent.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 17, 2008
#20
  • Oct 17, 2008
  • #20
I have an 8" antenna on both of ours. What I've noticed is that if you get good reception, you don't seem to lose it. I can still travel 40 miles away and get my stations that I get well in town. But there's a few stations that are weak. And with the shorty, they are noticeably weaker. But the look is more than worth it, especially since I listen to my iPhone most of the time. I would say that if you're worried, get the 14". It's a good compromise.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
injectors keeping up?
  • optionizerSS
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
286
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
optionizerSS
O
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
555
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?