• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech

supercharged 2.8L V6

  • Thread starter Thread starter Supercharged2.8
  • Start date Start date Sep 19, 2004
S

Supercharged2.8

New Member
Sep 19, 2004
4
0
0
Sep 19, 2004
#1
  • Sep 19, 2004
  • #1
check out my supercharged 2.8, it will run circles around MOST five-ohs
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/685530
 
7

77sleeper

GO BUCS!
Founding Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,266
0
0
Napalm, AZ
Sep 20, 2004
#2
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #2
sweet, what is the blower off of?
 

marvinmycat

Founding Member
Feb 13, 2002
1,179
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Sep 20, 2004
#3
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #3
Post some numbers. We need numbers!!!

Looks like you did some decent work to it. Good job.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Sep 20, 2004
#4
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #4
What cars did 2.8's come in?

I'm familiar with the 2.3 4-cylinder, 3.8 V6, and 3.3(200ci) inline 6 being in Fox bodies. But I've never heard of a 2.8.
 
S

SpectorV

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2000
1,872
0
36
Florence, Alabama
Sep 20, 2004
#5
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #5
i think its a 3.8 i dont belive they have 2.8s... and its not hard to run circles around cars that usually run 15.0s.... (i know notch backs and well taken care of fox bodies can do better... just speaking on average)
 
7

77sleeper

GO BUCS!
Founding Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,266
0
0
Napalm, AZ
Sep 20, 2004
#6
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #6
2.8 started in the 74 mustang and went through 82 (i think it was 82)
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Sep 20, 2004
#7
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #7
77sleeper said:
2.8 started in the 74 mustang and went through 82 (i think it was 82)
Click to expand...

Thank you, Sleeper. I was just curious and didn't know(no real need to).

As for you, Supercharged2.8. I never said I doubted you. But you sending me a PM telling me "it is a 2.8" and telling me "to do my homework" makes you an @$$hole in my book.
Why should I do my homework on the 2.8? Am I restoring Pinto? Sorry if I never gave two ****s about older V6es, but IMO, everything 6 should be an inline, even my 2001. But thanks for the list of crappy 70's cars this engine came in. Now I know where to look for a cheap boat anchor.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Sep 20, 2004
#8
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #8
why did you pick a 2.8, i just want to know. they cam in bronco 2's and rangers also, and they were dogs, especially with an auto tranny. but anything can be built to not be a dog and that is a great thing to do, thumbs up on your 2.8.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Sep 20, 2004
#9
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #9
i had an 84 bronco 2 with an auto and a smoky 2.8 with 4x4, great low end power for the mud, but if you want to pass somebody, think again. if you take your cats off and run a single flowmaster 40 series, it will sound very close to a v8 and it will be very loud and not a ricey sound at all.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Sep 20, 2004
#10
  • Sep 20, 2004
  • #10
what size carb is that. i want that blower on my 311.
 
7

77sleeper

GO BUCS!
Founding Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,266
0
0
Napalm, AZ
Sep 21, 2004
#11
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #11
[QUOTE='66 coupe]Thank you, Sleeper. I was just curious and didn't know(no real need to).

But thanks for the list of crappy 70's cars this engine came in. Now I know where to look for a cheap boat anchor. [/QUOTE]

WTF thank me and then Bash my car?
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Sep 21, 2004
#12
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #12
77sleeper said:
WTF thank me and then Bash my car?
Click to expand...

It just pisses me off that he came in here looking to argue with people. I'm sure he was just waiting for somebody to say a 2.8 never existed so he could have a little dispute with them, prove them wrong, and look like a big boy. And I never said it didn't exist. I just asked what it came in.

And no. I am not a fan of 70's cars. I do like Mustang II's, but only because they're different and pretty uncommon(especially when you go to as many shows as I do). I also like Mavericks and Comets, but only because my family's first car was a '74 Comet and I still remember it well.
Keep in mind, I was born in '84. The styling used in 70's cars just doesn't appeal to me. Almost like designers were obsessed with cramming square pegs into circular holes, and vice-versa.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Sep 21, 2004
#13
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #13
Here's an example.

A '77 Pontiac Grand Prix. My family had one like this(our 2nd car). My dad is still convinced it was a somewhat nice car. But IMO, the thing is just downright hideous.

Look at this pic, and tell me the car doesn't look like it should have square wheels.


And it wasn't just a GM thing


The bumpers definately didn't help anythign either.
 

ChaosStarter

Founding Member
Jan 16, 2002
1,637
0
0
Metuchen, NJ
Sep 21, 2004
#14
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #14
WHERE DID MY POST GO?! I know mods can edit, but they can delete too?!
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Sep 21, 2004
#15
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #15
hey man, chrome bumpers were all the rage...
i just saw a 'retro stylin' PT cruiser,
it was a GT, had chromed over bumpers, and had the taillights that resemble something off a buick with fins...
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Sep 21, 2004
#16
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #16
Ghostalker said:
hey man, chrome bumpers were all the rage...
i just saw a 'retro stylin' PT cruiser,
it was a GT, had chromed over bumpers, and had the taillights that resemble something off a buick with fins...
Click to expand...

No. Chrome bumpers are fine. I have them on my '66.

But '74 it was Federally mandated that cars had to have big bumpers that stuck out 3 feet from the front and back. Probably so you had a place to sit and wait for the tow-truck when the unreliable piece of 70's Detroit iron broke down on you.
 

Ghostalker

Member
Jul 5, 2003
184
0
16
Danbury, CT
Sep 21, 2004
#17
  • Sep 21, 2004
  • #17
yeah, i would never sit on my car as is,
3 inches of poly eurethane doesnt tend to make a good seat anyhow... 0_^
*heres to never having to break down, and wait for a tow truck!
 

CarlsV6

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
400
0
0
Stafford, VA
Sep 22, 2004
#18
  • Sep 22, 2004
  • #18
This is a 6cyl mustang forum, last time I checked it didn't specify what year it had to be....

That's a pretty cool project, Love to see pics of it all together. What are some specs on the motor and what blower is that? What are you doing about the dist?

Shame it still doesn't have the 79 front end on it...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
1996 v6-v8 swap
  • jujuonurmom
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
180
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2025
jujuonurmom
J
0
'04 V6 running rich excessively on both banks
  • 04DSGVert
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
301
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Oct 27, 2025
04DSGVert
0
T
2002 V6 3.8L Help Me
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • Apr 4, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
681
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 12, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
D
supercharging my v6 4.0
  • dreamerv6stang
  • Jan 12, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
939
The Welcome Wagon Jul 21, 2025
tovlux6
T
9
1998 V6 - What is this line called?
  • 98_Stanger
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
246
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 10, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?