• Mustang Forums
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum

supercharger timing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Foxbodyguy49
  • Start date Start date Sep 20, 2019

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 20, 2019
#1
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #1
looking to free up some more low end torque out of my tune. I don't have access to a dyno to do it and was wondering if anyone could suggest some changes to my timing map and my accel enrichment. attached is my tune and a datalog with a pull on the parkway.
 

Attachments

  • CurrentTune.msq
    CurrentTune.msq
    118.7 KB · Views: 192
  • 2019-09-19_14.16.16.msl
    2019-09-19_14.16.16.msl
    2.4 MB · Views: 177

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Sep 20, 2019
#2
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #2
Well you are a bit lean, the AFR does not match the AFR target under load.. If you are running 93 octane and aluminum heads [ I think you are if memory serves] you can easily increase the timing at WOT 100kpa up to 33-34* from 30*
 

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 20, 2019
#3
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #3
Thanks Steve! And yeah I’m still trying to get WoT fueling dialed in I don’t get much chance to really let it rip on the streets only cruise and light throttle any pointers on best way to go about that? Just do 4th gear pulls?
 

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 20, 2019
#4
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #4
And yes I’m running 93 and AFR165 alumium heads with 1.6 RRs
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Sep 20, 2019
#5
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #5
nah, 2nd or 3rd gear pulls will do to get you within 2%... give me a minute and ill trim it for you and bump your ign table..
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Sep 20, 2019
#6
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #6
here ya go
 

Attachments

  • Foxbodyguy REV.1.0.6.msq
    Foxbodyguy REV.1.0.6.msq
    116.1 KB · Views: 237

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 20, 2019
#7
  • Sep 20, 2019
  • #7
You the man thanks! Overall the car is great I’m super happy with the microsquirt so far beats the hell outta my old chip that’s for sure lol
 

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 21, 2019
#8
  • Sep 21, 2019
  • #8
looking alot better now thanks. but question what do you think about my duty cycle? im only running 30lb injectors right now and my duty cycle hit 97 on this last datalog so im thinking new injectors are in the near future what size do you suggest?
 

Attachments

  • 2019-09-20_23.59.19.msl
    2019-09-20_23.59.19.msl
    1.9 MB · Views: 187
  • CurrentTune.msq
    CurrentTune.msq
    118.7 KB · Views: 187

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,282
523
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Sep 22, 2019
#9
  • Sep 22, 2019
  • #9
LU-47's
You might need connector adapters which Ford no longer makes.

LMR still has the kit.

Ford Performance Mustang Fuel Injectors - EV6 - Uscar w/ Jetronic Adapters - 47lb (86-04)

Upgrade your 1986-2004 Mustang's fuel system with this Ford Performance 47lb fuel injector kit!
lmr.com
 
Last edited: Sep 22, 2019

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 22, 2019
#10
  • Sep 22, 2019
  • #10
Thanks so when changing injectors with MIcrosquirt will I have to re-tune the whole fuel map or will changing required fuel info make the switch that easy
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,282
523
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Sep 23, 2019
#11
  • Sep 23, 2019
  • #11
Ideally, just the required fuel, but it didn't work for me. It developed a low load stumble. Was probably there all the time but wasn't noticeable until the injector change. Steve figured it out.

I upgraded because I, too, was maxing out the duty cycle. Mine's a bit different because I use the MAF for fuel & MAP for spark.
 

Foxbodyguy49

Member
Jul 30, 2019
60
9
18
Longisland
Sep 23, 2019
#12
  • Sep 23, 2019
  • #12
Gotcha okey thanks I appreciate it will prob up the injectors over the winter hopefully with a few other things
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Sep 23, 2019
#13
  • Sep 23, 2019
  • #13
Either lu47 or deka-60 will do nicely.. I think the deka-60 would be the better choice as they dont require the adapters.
 
Reactions: Foxbodyguy49
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
290
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 21, 2026
X-cam34
X
X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
82
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
Tips for WUE and ASE tuning
  • Mustang5L5
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
1
Views
477
Digital Self-tuning Forum Oct 10, 2025
gkomo
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?