• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

t body and maf question

  • Thread starter Thread starter dkhead1998
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2009
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 5, 2009
#1
  • Apr 5, 2009
  • #1
i have a slightly modifyied 90lx with just a crane cam and a cold air kit but iam planing on doing more what size t body and maf should i use
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,951
2,906
194
Middle of Maine
Apr 5, 2009
#2
  • Apr 5, 2009
  • #2
As big as you can afford. You cannot go to big on t-body or maf. Plus you do not have to worry about having to go bigger later if the car ends up being a real beast later.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 6, 2009
#3
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #3
What sort of future mods are you planning?
 
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 6, 2009
#4
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #4
so a c&l 76 mm maf and a 70 mm t body is ok
im putting equal length headers and a x pipe with cats,a ram air kit, a255 fuel pump with adj regulator. for now
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 6, 2009
#5
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #5
dkhead1998 said:
so a c&l 76 mm maf and a 70 mm t body is ok
im putting equal length headers and a x pipe with cats,a ram air kit, a255 fuel pump with adj regulator. for now
Click to expand...

Yeah, that'll be fine as long as the opening for the T body is at least 70MM. Which intake do you have?
 
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 6, 2009
#6
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #6
it is a stock intake
 

5.0Torx

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
252
3
29
Apr 6, 2009
#7
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #7
Not much point if youve still got the stock heads and intake, if you ask me.

Get an explorer intake at least.
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 6, 2009
#8
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #8
At this point I agree with 5.0Torx. There's no point in upgrading the TB since the opening in the intake is somewhere around 60MM. You could put the MAM on but you won't really pick up any power from that alone.

Mods like these are best done from inside to out. Pick a block that you want to use be it the stock block (I used mine) or whatever. Then decide what you want to use the car for and find a suitable cam, heads and intake. This stuff should all be matched together. Then top that stuff off with the bolt-ons that go on the out outside of the engine like MAM, TB, injectors and the like. It'll come out a lot better and you'll be much happier this way.

I did mine on a budget and I spent years collecting parts before I put it all together. I'm very pleased with the results.



View attachment 263111
 
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 6, 2009
#9
  • Apr 6, 2009
  • #9
what about opening up the intake to 70 mm
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 7, 2009
#10
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #10
dkhead1998 said:
what about opening up the intake to 70 mm
Click to expand...

You stand a risk of breaking out of the opening into the EGR passages by trying to open it that far.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,217
17,899
224
Massachusetts
Apr 7, 2009
#11
  • Apr 7, 2009
  • #11
With stock intake and heads, i wouldn't even bother. Slapping a 70mm or 75mm TB is a waste on a stock setup. Go with a matched combo. Aftermarket intake with a 65 or 70mm TB
 
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 8, 2009
#12
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #12
can i use a 65mm t body and a 76mm maf ?
 

Maryland Stang

Active Member
Aug 21, 2002
1,656
30
39
Greenville, NC
Apr 8, 2009
#13
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #13
Yup.
 
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 8, 2009
#14
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #14
alright cool thanks guys
 
D

dkhead1998

New Member
Oct 16, 2008
14
0
0
egg harbor twp,nj
Apr 8, 2009
#15
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • #15
alright so that much of a difference between the t-body and the maf is ok
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
258
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
741
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
915
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
759
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
T
Resolved No run or idle
  • Thebluefox1
  • Oct 10, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
456
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 25, 2025
DadLife0724
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?