Tfs-r Or Edelbrock Performer Rpm Ii Intake

braxus

New Member
Oct 25, 2014
4
0
1
I'm planning on building a 5.8L EFI engine for a 95 Mustang GT. The engine I'm going for streetability, better mileage, low to midrange torque, while enjoying a bump in overall power. Im using a roller cam with 208/216 duration, approx. 9.5 compression, AFR 185 heads, and Hooker shorty headers. Which intake would flow better for a power band between 1500-5500 rpm? The Edelbrock Performer RPM II or the TFS-R intake? I notice the TFS has a 75mm opening, where the RPM II has a 70mm opening. The Edelbrock is cheaper for me here.
 
  • Sponsors (?)


I'm not really a big fan of the TFS intakes, with the exception of maybe the R intake. I vote rpm II, but really with that large of a motor, I bet some of the larger intakes would do fine as well.

Joe
 
For those 2 choices and your engine parameters I vote Eddy rpm. Just a fwiw though,the intake will not effect your gas consumption in and of itself,very much if at all.