• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

tfs stage 1 cam...how bad w/our eec

  • Thread starter Thread starter Finally a 5.0
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2005
F

Finally a 5.0

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
65
0
0
Sep 12, 2005
#1
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #1
just wondering how bad our 94/95 cars handle the stage 1 cam? it is already in a motor i am looking at, and want to now every symptom i could end up with. this will be in a daily driver, and will have to wait on a tune for a little bit. it is match up with t/w heads and track heat intake, pro m maf and 30# injectors. how will it idle/drive at low rpms/drive at high rpms? will it be a staller? any info would be a big help. thanks a lot.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 12, 2005
#2
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #2
Each combo can act diffferent even though they have the same or similar parts.

Some have said that cam causes no probs and others have had to custom tune for it.

The combo sounds like it could make some good power.

Grady
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Sep 12, 2005
#3
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #3
I've been running it for a year now without tuning and no problems at all. I'm running 18* of timing, run 13.2s with 2.0 60's.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Sep 12, 2005
#4
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #4
Well actually it was pretty stable, and that was with a massive vacuum leak. Of course I may end up eating my words as my stang is running worse and worse everyday. I do have some minor bucking at low rpm (sub-1500), but only while cruising and coasting. When I hit the throttle, it goes away instantly.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Sep 13, 2005
#5
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #5
mine has stock like driveability.
 

sonicblue87lx

Member
Jul 1, 2005
126
0
16
Sep 13, 2005
#6
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #6
I have no problem with mine at all
 
F

Finally a 5.0

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
65
0
0
Sep 13, 2005
#7
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #7
well, not exactly what i expected to hear, but thats a good thing. any other comments?
 

Wi Stang

Member
Jun 27, 2004
248
0
16
Fountain City, WI
Sep 13, 2005
#8
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #8
Mine idles pretty good, and drives pretty good. There is a little bucking at low RPM's with mine just like CManT, but other than that I am very happy with it.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Sep 13, 2005
#9
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #9
with the stock eec I had some bucking like posted above, cold starts are FAT and stall it, mostly when the weather turns colder is when that is bad. it is rich at idle though.

With the tweecer, the bucking is totally gone now, it has been gone since I did my base tune using the j4j1 file with very minamal mods to that file. The idle is still rich, but the weather has not gone cold yet so I dont know how bad it is, but the rich idle is the only thing I have left as far as drivability things go.

on my stock shortblock, unported gt40 heads, tmoss ported stock lower (not the tmoss ported gt40 I have now) and the tfs cam I ran a 13.5 @ 102 with the stock eec.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
G
Drivetrain trickflow Stage 3 camshaft 347 stroker. also too much gear????
  • Gross Virgin
  • May 2, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
820
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2024
Gross Virgin
G
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?