• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

The quickest way to gain 40 hp

  • Thread starter Thread starter justinmanges05
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2010
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Mar 24, 2010
#41
  • Mar 24, 2010
  • #41
75 shot and call it a day. 50 shot isn't that noticeable, 75 is fairly safe and it's there when you want it, not when you dont... plus you will end up with more torque than spending the money on heads/cam/tune/longtubes and spend a LOT less.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Mar 24, 2010
#42
  • Mar 24, 2010
  • #42
And on the note of LS1's...

Catback only SS, A4 went 12.9x on street tires. Buddy's M6 T/A, lid and catback went 12.80's on street tires.
 

DogVomit

Member
Jun 9, 2005
192
1
19
Tampa, FL
Mar 26, 2010
#43
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #43
If you go more than a grand in, you're throwing money at 40 whp, which will still allow Japcraps to hand you your ass.

Save and get blown, man. Then you will be running with the big boys... might even hand a few specialized imports cars their ass, sporting 400 plus to the wheels
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Mar 26, 2010
#44
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #44
ChillPhatCat said:
More Horsepower... I quoted your post which was all about horsepower.

More power = more acceleration when you're not burning rubber or shifting poorly. Whether you run a scalding quarter mile time for what you have or not, the car with a better power to weight ratio will give you more SOTP feel. Power does matter in that regard.
Click to expand...


You didn't quote me.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Mar 26, 2010
#45
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #45
Jbauer said:
im making 265HP 301 TQ dynod at MPH in atlanta.. i think that may be close to 300 crank.

Flowmaster Catback
O/R H pipe
Accufab plenum
75mm throttle body
K&N FIPKII intake
DIablo tuner (which sucks, i have SCT now so i may b making more power)
Click to expand...

Is this a 2V? To be honest, I am skeptical about this claim. I'm not saying it's your doing, but more likely the dyno operator. A stock 2V typically generates an honest 225 HP (+-5). I really have a hard time believing that these bolt ons added up to 40 RWHP.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Mar 26, 2010
#46
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #46
First, I would learn to the drive the car properly. Take the car to the track and make 15-20 passes over 2-3 trips. Save your slips, post them up and see what you can improve on each time. If you want to race, the first mod needs to be a drag radial. Nitto makes a great beginner tire, and will allow you to get out of the hole and make more consistant passes than a street tire since you have stock gears and power. Then look at a set of MT or BFG drag radials if you start adding gears and more power.
 

Skidzz

Tinkerbell
Apr 11, 2005
328
1
19
Salt Lake City, UT
Mar 26, 2010
#47
  • Mar 26, 2010
  • #47
twogts4us said:
Is this a 2V? To be honest, I am skeptical about this claim. I'm not saying it's your doing, but more likely the dyno operator. A stock 2V typically generates an honest 225 HP (+-5). I really have a hard time believing that these bolt ons added up to 40 RWHP.
Click to expand...

I agree. My PI-swapped '96 with cams, tune.....well just read my sig. It only makes 265 rwhp with all that. BUT I have beating a few LS1's, but I beat the drivers. Most of the LS1's that I've lost too were auto's. Just goes to show how important the driver mod is.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Mar 27, 2010
#48
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #48
Rickyll7 said:
What kind of K-member brace is that in the picture in that link? Is that for a convertible?
Click to expand...

Yeah, that car must have been a convertible.


ChillPhatCat said:
No way you're going to gain 30 RWHp without at least long tubes and under drive pulleys in addition to catback, midpipe and cold air intake and maybe a tune. I think you'd be hard pressed to get 300 RWHP without stage 3 cams/springs and some well matched heads.
Click to expand...

Read my post again below...I said 300RWHP with cams and longtubes. No headwork needed. The dyno sheet in my link proves it. His cars have safe tunes and live a long time. He's been in business 20 years.

SVT32VDOHC said:
260HP engines put down about 211-220RWHP. With a mid pipe, cat-back, and a cold air induction you should lay down 240-250RWHP. With pullies, TB, longtubes, cams and a tune, you could reach almost 300RWHP.

Read this: 1999-2004 Mustang GT Naturally Aspirated Performance Package
Click to expand...
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Mar 27, 2010
#49
  • Mar 27, 2010
  • #49
twogts4us said:
You didn't quote me.
Click to expand...

Whatever, that's really not an important detail, I assumed the person I quoted was the same that questioned what I meant by the post...


SVT32VDOHC said:
Yeah, that car must have been a convertible.


Read my post again below...I said 300RWHP with cams and longtubes. No headwork needed. The dyno sheet in my link proves it. His cars have safe tunes and live a long time. He's been in business 20 years.

Click to expand...

I was more disputing what you said about gaining 30-40 Hp on a midpipe, catback and and an intake. I wouldn't believe that for a second unless I personally installed those parts and saw it dynod before and after, I meant that pullies, longtubes and a tune on top of those mods would probably get you to 240-250 RWHp.

300 hp with those other parts you listed, set up by someone that has been doing it for a while... I could believe that a lot easier. I don't think you're going to see those gains from just buying some performance parts online and then installing them in your garage, unless you buy a proven "package". Part matching is a big part of making good numbers out of mild parts, when you do come across those builds.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Mar 28, 2010
#50
  • Mar 28, 2010
  • #50
ChillPhatCat said:
The upper limit for the block is around 400 RWHp... Probably best to dial it back to 375 RWHp to stay in safe limits. That'd be what maybe 8 lbs on a roots blower? I'd imagine the TR3650 should be fine if you're not going to be tracking the car regularly... it's rated to something like 360 Ft-lbs of torque.
Click to expand...

Just to clear this up for him it's the internals not the block that will crap out first. The modular blocks are plenty strong it's the factory pistons, rods, crank that you would need to replace if you want to go much over 400
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Mar 28, 2010
#51
  • Mar 28, 2010
  • #51
svttech76 said:
Just to clear this up for him it's the internals not the block that will crap out first. The modular blocks are plenty strong it's the factory pistons, rods, crank that you would need to replace if you want to go much over 400
Click to expand...

Sorry, yeah, I have a bad habit of just saying "block" where I mean that the stock short block can't handle such and such power. In most any engine the internals are what go first when you put some boost through it.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Mar 29, 2010
#52
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #52
svttech76 said:
Just to clear this up for him it's the internals not the block that will crap out first. The modular blocks are plenty strong it's the factory pistons, rods, crank that you would need to replace if you want to go much over 400
Click to expand...

Factory Pistons and Rods - agreed.

Factory Crank - ? I disagree, it will take you well over 400 HP. For those forging their bottom end, adding a Cobra crank is a natural move, but not totally necessary. How many broken cranks have you seen?
 
M

Mstngman

New Member
Jan 22, 2013
1
0
1
Montebello, CA
Apr 16, 2013
#53
  • Apr 16, 2013
  • #53
justinmanges05 said:
I'm fairly new to the 4.6 liter motor. I just bought an 02 Mustang GT, and it is rated at 260 hp. Thats a stupid number. I mean, why not 300? So, what I want to know is, what is the most cost effective way to bump this car up into the 300 horse range?

-Justin-
Click to expand...
I just finished a 2002 Mustang GT: Here is what I installed, Mid JBA Headers,JBA H-Pipe,Edelbrock Victor Jr. manifold,MSD Coils,Edelbrock fuel rails,21lb injectors, but bought some 42lb for when I re-do the engine and install a Pro Charger,BBK 78mm throttle body,Stage 2 Comp Cams,Comp Valve springs,BBK Cold Air Intake,4:10 Gears from Ford Racing, Front and Rear Eiback springs,shocks, and Sway bars,BBK Camber Caster plates,Racing Clutch. This car was tested at GTR Performance in Riverside,CA and the rear wheel horsepower was at 296+. This is a naturally aspirated engine that has over 140,000 miles on it and for these numbers I think it was really great.
Remember that at the rear wheels these cars will give you 210hp so at 80 more horsepower it was well worth it. My buddy was really happy with the car. It sounds like a Monster. Oh I also installed Borla exhaust wich sounds unreal...
 

Clayton302

Member
May 21, 2012
79
2
8
Hurricane Utah
Apr 17, 2013
#54
  • Apr 17, 2013
  • #54
Dynos are used for tuning not so great for comparing one car to another or just for numbers. Although a dyno readout from a good shop will get you a ball park figure of how the car is doing. Read up on the truth behind dyno results. They are a tool. You could change a result by simply changing the correction factor. Every dyno reads different. So if you need or want dyno service then pick a trusted and preferably local dyno shop to run a baseline on and go back to that dyno and insure that the setup is the same (correction factor) and operated by the same person then look for the changes in HP and TQ after mods. Anyone that posted "my car makes X amount of power so yours should too or this car did this" on and on and on.. Those people might benefit from reading this: http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/general/hrdp_1103_chassis_dyno_testing/viewall.html

I'm going to do kinda of the same thing as an example: A friend of mine bought a nasty build LS3 car and took it to a dyno shop and got a readout of 430 corrected RWHP. He was disappointed with the results so he took it to the shop that built it and got 530 corrected RWHP now he tells everyone he has 530 RWHP and I follow behind and tell them he has 430 . Not really but which number to you think would be closer?

To answer the OP: Just start with the basics (intake, exhaust, gears, email tune (joe at tricktuners) oh and the most important good tires) and go from there. If you really want 300 to race with on a budget do something like a zex wet kit and set it up for 75-100. The only reason I suggest the Zex kit is because of the safety features for beginners (will shut off the NOS if fuel pressure drops) that's about the safest kit you can do for low cost.

Have fun with what ever you do!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
197
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?