• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Engine Trick Flow Twisted Wedge Heads, Stage 2 Cam, 1.7 Roller Rockers, Will It Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samplebridge
  • Start date Start date Nov 19, 2015
  • Tags Tags
    1.7 1995 cam heads mustang rockers roller sn95 trickflow twistedwedge
S

Samplebridge

Member
Nov 19, 2015
19
2
13
Nov 19, 2015
#1
  • Nov 19, 2015
  • #1
Will a set of twisted wedge heads with 1.7RRs that I got for free and a stage 2 track max cam work without PtV problems.

Another question. With a JLT cai, stock manifold (gonna get one later) 70mm throttle body, headers, and a flowmaster exhaust, What size injectors will I need with this stuff plus the heads and cam?
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 19, 2015
#2
  • Nov 19, 2015
  • #2
You're going to probably have clearance issues. You would have to measure anyway and that cam would be to big for your combo of parts to run efficiently. Total mismatch of parts that will run like dog dodo. Just saying...
 
S

Samplebridge

Member
Nov 19, 2015
19
2
13
Nov 20, 2015
#3
  • Nov 20, 2015
  • #3
A5literMan said:
You're going to probably have clearance issues. You would have to measure anyway and that cam would be to big for your combo of parts to run efficiently. Total mismatch of parts that will run like dog dodo. Just saying...
Click to expand...
I know I need a manifold but what else is mismatched
 

2L8ULUZ2

Will kiss Moderator ass for title
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2000
3,033
14
99
WNC
Nov 22, 2015
#4
  • Nov 22, 2015
  • #4
Samplebridge said:
I know I need a manifold but what else is mismatched
Click to expand...

The cam is too big for a stock displacement engine that your not going to turn high enough to take advantage of a cam that size. In other words forget about making any decent low end torque. Your also going to end up with clearance problems with stock pistons with the TW heads and that cam with 1.7 rockers. It will bump the lift from .542/.563 to .575/.598 and I just don't see that clearing with stock pistons. I would go with the Stage 1 cam for a street car and pair it with a set of 24 or 30# injectors max. I ran heads/cam/intake on a 306 with 24# without any issues.
 
S

Samplebridge

Member
Nov 19, 2015
19
2
13
Nov 23, 2015
#5
  • Nov 23, 2015
  • #5
2L8ULUZ2 said:
The cam is too big for a stock displacement engine that your not going to turn high enough to take advantage of a cam that size. In other words forget about making any decent low end torque. Your also going to end up with clearance problems with stock pistons with the TW heads and that cam with 1.7 rockers. It will bump the lift from .542/.563 to .575/.598 and I just don't see that clearing with stock pistons. I would go with the Stage 1 cam for a street car and pair it with a set of 24 or 30# injectors max. I ran heads/cam/intake on a 306 with 24# without any issues.
Click to expand...
Want do you means too big for stock displacement? I'd understand PTV clearance but what does turning high enough (I'd assume you mean RPMs) have go do with the cam if the heads will bump the redline up to 6500 before valve float.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 23, 2015
#6
  • Nov 23, 2015
  • #6
The cam will not fit with 1.7's. I know that fits an explorer motor(with 1.6's). That cam makes power mid to higher rpms. The intake flows low to mid rpms. With all the extra duration you're going to loose low speed air velocity and create a "dog" that is slow to rev through the rpms. The tfs 2 isn't a great performing cam. I've seen a lot of cars with other cams out perform the 2 on the track. With a good MAF,induction track(cai,tb,intake) and heads I would recommend you stay with a tfs1,comp cams 270,or better yet a custom cam. I am assuming you're running steeper rear gears(3.73-4.10's) I also would suggest 24-30#inj and a chip for the ecu for best results.
 
S

Samplebridge

Member
Nov 19, 2015
19
2
13
Nov 23, 2015
#7
  • Nov 23, 2015
  • #7
3.73s yes. How much would a custom cam cost over stage 2.
 

2L8ULUZ2

Will kiss Moderator ass for title
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2000
3,033
14
99
WNC
Nov 26, 2015
#8
  • Nov 26, 2015
  • #8
Samplebridge said:
3.73s yes. How much would a custom cam cost over stage 2.
Click to expand...

A custom cam is going to run you about $350 and it will be a little better performing vs a off the shelf cam. I would look at the stage 1 cam if it were my car based on the mods that you listed. I run the Lunati 51014 cam and it is very similar to the Stage 1 cam and I made over 300hp with that cam with heads, intake, etc on a 306. Any specific reason you are set on the stage 2 cam?
 
S

Samplebridge

Member
Nov 19, 2015
19
2
13
Nov 26, 2015
#9
  • Nov 26, 2015
  • #9
2L8ULUZ2 said:
A custom cam is going to run you about $350 and it will be a little better performing vs a off the shelf cam. I would look at the stage 1 cam if it were my car based on the mods that you listed. I run the Lunati 51014 cam and it is very similar to the Stage 1 cam and I made over 300hp with that cam with heads, intake, etc on a 306. Any specific reason you are set on the stage 2 cam?
Click to expand...
I'm thinking of the stage 1 now. I liked the stage 2 because it gave alot of lift and leeways for later mods. I'm thinking of getting a dart SHP 302 block later down the road and building the bottom end while swapping the top end to it and a turbo.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 27, 2015
#10
  • Nov 27, 2015
  • #10
I paid 403$ for my custom billet core custom from bullet cams. Also if you do step up to a dart build you're more than likely going to swap out any cam you previously installed. No point in keeping something designed around a n/a stock block 302. More than likely you will not only add cubic inches but also forced induction and that is a completely different animal. Glad to hear you have decided against the tfs 2. You'll be happy with that smaller cam. It actually works fairly well with forced induction also FYI. Good luck on your build.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
908
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
81
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
6
Engine Prw rockers, trick flow cam, gt40 heads
  • 67fox
  • Apr 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
hollywoodstang8
H
Engine Cam idle and timing questions - big cam, little knowledge
  • Justin87
  • Jul 6, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2021
Middleagecrisis
M
B
SOLD 1993 Mustang LX Notchback- 347 Stroker
  • Bzammitt
  • Jun 19, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
7
Views
6K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jul 10, 2021
Bzammitt
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?