• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Twin turbo BMW 135

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlackVert
  • Start date Start date Dec 17, 2009

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 17, 2009
#1
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #1
A co-worker took me out today for a spin in his car ... one of those twin turbo BMW 135 coupes. He says he has done an upgrade which increased the power by about 70 horses. Apparently it has electornically controlled waste gates and the upgrade increases the boost from 8psi to 12psi.

All I can say is, "holy crap!". That thing is really fast. Those turbos kick in early and it just keeps pulling. He got it up to 130 and then let out of it. I was like, "dude this is not safe, please slow down". I am not at all used to those kind of speeds.

I know there are faster cars out there, including some of the cars you guys on this forum have, but for me, I can't remember the last time I was in a car that fast. I have no idea if mine is as fast either, it is sitting (again!) and I have never gone that fast in it, especially on the highway.
 

HankyGT

Member
Jan 15, 2006
81
3
6
Warren, OH
Dec 17, 2009
#2
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #2
Turbos make for a really fun hp/tq curve....far more fun than n/a in the 'butt dyno' dept.

I would think that your car would drive around it; but nothing suprises me these days with our cars
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Dec 17, 2009
#3
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #3
Looked up some times and it seems they run in the low 13s. So maybe if this one is modded possibly high 12s? Not bad.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Dec 17, 2009
#4
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #4
I drove my bosses 335i which has that same motor. My first thought was that it would be a pretty close race between it and my car. I had to look up the numbers and it's a mid-13 second car, not even close to mine. Turbos are definitely more fun, which is why I'll be putting one on my car.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 17, 2009
#5
  • Dec 17, 2009
  • #5
Yep. I had a modded turbo car and the ruusshhhh is awesome but nowhere near what I got now lol,.

Let me add I like them a lot too Chris. BUT I was suprised to know even the "1" series weights 3400#.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 18, 2009
#6
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #6
Pokageek said:
BUT I was suprised to know even the "1" series weights 3400#.
Click to expand...


The 1 series isnt that small of a car. It is 10 inches shorter.....but its 5 inches wider, 4 inches taller, and its wheel base is 3 inches longer. <--- which is crazy since its overall length is 10 inches shorter than ours!

Combined that with superior materials BMW usually uses... 3400 seems about right .




BUT then again, the 335 is shorter than our car....and its got 4 doors. Makes you think how our cars could be considered too big.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 18, 2009
#7
  • Dec 18, 2009
  • #7
The bmw 1 series looks like those micro machine cars from when we were kids. I want a white 328xi 2dr coupe, black leather with a 6speed manual sooo bad!!!
 

caribe94

New Member
Dec 2, 2009
22
2
4
Virgin Islands
Dec 21, 2009
#8
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • #8
Black Stampede said:
Looked up some times and it seems they run in the low 13s. So maybe if this one is modded possibly high 12s? Not bad.
Click to expand...

+1
Raced one at the track. Spun too much in 1st gear and watched him run a 13.3@104.? to my 13.7@107.9. Nuff respect.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Dec 21, 2009
#9
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • #9
lol you all should see the thread like this i started over on corral. completely different direction ...

BMW 135 twin turbo - Corral Forums

one more reason to prefer you guys ...
 

jromeo

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
16
0
0
charleston sc.
Dec 21, 2009
#10
  • Dec 21, 2009
  • #10
I had an 08 535i with the same motor. Took it to an 1/8 mile track, went 9.20 at 76 mph. the 535 is heavier. not even close to my stang but alot more fun to drive. $890 payment got the best of me, had to sale it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
881
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Wheels-Tires LS mii swap and rear rim size/axle questions....
  • 78mIIman
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
722
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 6, 2025
78 Mach1
My 93 4v Fox
  • OffspringChaos
  • Aug 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2024
bird_dog0347
T
Decisions decisions Pro M or Holley Terminator X
  • tank76
  • Dec 21, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
65
Views
21K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 24, 2023
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?