wow...i like VR-4's...good car. damn stylish and good looking. i would actually buy one...until that would associate me with the likes of you. theyre zippy over 100...but dude...what the hell are you doing? you troll into a mustang site...just to stir ****. youre bench racing. we have seen no proof that a car even exists...and those 1/4 times for a 92 Vr-4 are done by guys that work at car and driver and motor trend. its not your average joe blow. so please cut the "im a bad ass driver" ****. lets see this car, lets see time slips...and so a mustang is a mustang...but a mustang doesnt break down every 10,000 with something major. i hope you realize a VR-4 is nothing special. its unique but not special. it is heavy, not a good 1/4 car. and your 92 doesnt even have all wheel steering or even 6 gears. youre by no means a cream of the crop 3000GT. and with a set of drag radials, which would put it slightly close to the 3000 in the traction department...youd get raped...sorry. and why do you bring ls1's into this. an average driver in an average mach 1 and an average driver in an average ls1 would run roughly the same times. so i dont see how you neccesarely call the ls1 faster. now im gonna be nice and not call you a dimwitted ****ing troll and just simply ask to see some dyno charts and time slips. and dont feed me the line about not being able to get to an AWD dyno. even if that is the case, a time slip will do...or more than one person corroberating your story. im not afraid to admit when i lose, a mach 1 and i are about 50/50 racing each other, and my SS isnt tired by any means, it dynoed 318hp/325 and we jumped off the line the same. just show us a time slip or even rpove that you have a car and we'll lay off a little...for a little bit anyway. just stop being a ****ing troll.