• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which combo would win a race?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90mustangGT
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Nov 11, 2004
#21
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #21
tmoss said:
I haven't done this (yet), so what is required? Do you have to relieve the cylinders at the bottom for the rods?
Click to expand...

Tom, yes you have to relieve the bottom of the cylinders for the rod bolts(ARP 8740 cap screws) to clear properly. I was always told .060"-.080", I like to go .100".



I am torn on this topic, I think the 347 is better in the long run, but with what you have right now the budget 306 will go faster since you have better heads and supporting parts. I would look at a stock replacment aftermarket rid, you can get a cast SCAT for around under $200 and it already has the ARP fastners and is better then a stock rod, espeically one with a lot of miles. You'll need to rebalance it but if your shooting for 10:1 your goig to need different pistons anyway, then you can get a full floating pin design.

Like 25th stated if you race in a local class or track series you may want to really look into it so you don't build something that will put you in a class you can not compete in.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Nov 11, 2004
#22
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #22
Just put better heads on the 347 down the road.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Nov 11, 2004
#23
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #23
krahkin said:
Hate to hijack. Just wanted to ask 90mustangGT if he races at Dallas?
Click to expand...

Almost every weekend until recently.


Thanks everyone. The reason I am torn is for the same reasons you all have given me to build the different combo's. I belive the 347 would leave hardest off the line but the 306/AFR/CC combo would then play catch up. I think when I finally got the 306 fully built thought I would kick myself to think of how much I would be making with a 347. It least with the 347, I wouldn't be re-modding, I would just be replacing the only thing still stock under the hood.

I think I will start the prossess and see where it takes me and leave everyone alone with my questions.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 11, 2004
#24
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #24
Well the 347 leaving harder off the line doesn't matter to much because 95% of your trip down the track will be above 3500rpm...just where the AFR's and cam come into play
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 12, 2004
#25
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #25
90mustangGT said:
Thanks everyone. The reason I am torn is for the same reasons you all have given me to build the different combo's. I belive the 347 would leave hardest off the line but the 306/AFR/CC combo would then play catch up. I think when I finally got the 306 fully built thought I would kick myself to think of how much I would be making with a 347. It least with the 347, I wouldn't be re-modding, I would just be replacing the only thing still stock under the hood.
Click to expand...


You're right. Once you put some real h/c/i on that 347, you'll forget all about that tiny 306 and you'll make it look like a civic Once you throw some TFS hi ports, vic jr's, afr 185's with a TFS R intake and a custom cam and your making like 425rwhp with the potential to run high 10's on motor you'll laugh at your self for even considering a 306. The 347 is your foundation and you can improve it down the road as money allows. I agree 100% that to go all out on a 347 now is very very expensive. Thats why I bought the Vortech SQ but even that wasn't 'cheap'. I'm hoping the 450-475rwhp will make me forget about the $2300 I just spent Good Luck man.

Mike
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 12, 2004
#26
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #26
Your other option could be do the 306 now and be happy and then add a novi 2000 or a vortech S trim down the road when you get power hungry again. If your gonna do a 306, I personally would use a TFS TW or an AFR 185. Pick the head first so you can run the proper piston and decide if you wanna boost down the road or not. Tough choice dude..
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
P
Thoughts on this odd (smog legal) combo?
  • PJV9126
  • Feb 8, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2023
91AOD5.0LX
The Most Preferred Aluminum heads
  • SSnakeGT127
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 28, 2021
SSnakeGT127
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?