• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which rockers with AFR 165's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LXSTASY
  • Start date Start date Jun 13, 2005

LXSTASY

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2000
932
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jun 13, 2005
#1
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #1
I was at Maple Grove this weekend and I was looking at Harland Sharpe rockers and they told me that the AFR head was not a true inline head and that I needed rockers that were $290 instead of $225. He said that the positioning is off and I need the more victor jr, ones. Is this true or can i use the inline head version of Harland Sharp or the blue FMS ones?
Any other rocker suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks
Dan
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jun 13, 2005
#2
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #2
My friend ran scorpions with his afr 165's. Worked just fine. I run ford racing 1.6's, work just fine too
 
M

meangreen92lx

Member
May 24, 2004
52
0
6
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Jun 13, 2005
#3
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #3
They are inline style. I run $195.00 scorpions on mine which FTI recommended. Any brand will work but I've heard of problems with the comp cams pro magnums and AFR heads. I believe it is a stud issue. The best move would be to upgrade to 7/16 studs while your there.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 13, 2005
#4
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #4
Yep I had Ed upgrade my studs from 3/8's to 7/16's for $30 bucks more.

He suggested to use the Scorpion 1.6's he sells for my car. They look to nice of a piece to be underneath valve covers They are a real nice quality and have worked flawlessly since I have had them...
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 13, 2005
#5
  • Jun 13, 2005
  • #5
I have Comp Cams Pro Magnum rockers for my Edelbrock heads. Chromeoly steel that are lighter at the valve than any aluminum rocker.....a lot stronger too.
 

LXSTASY

Founding Member
Apr 25, 2000
932
0
0
Long Island, NY
Jun 17, 2005
#6
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #6
Getting back to the inline head theory of AFR's i was told my the Harland Sharpe guy that although they said to use an inline head rocker, he said that the Victor Jr. rocker lined up better. any thoughts?
 
M

mustang120plus

Founding Member
Jan 10, 2002
261
0
0
Michigan
Jun 17, 2005
#7
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • #7
I personally have AFR 165's and I run scorpion 1.6's. I like them lots!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Looking for Roller Rockers for the Coupe
  • AeroCoupe
  • Feb 28, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
927
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 28, 2023
AeroCoupe
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
TB Injection Install (Aces Killshot)
  • LILCBRA
  • Feb 5, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
21K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Dec 1, 2024
LILCBRA
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?