• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Who has got an intake ready to install...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5spd GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 24, 2008
#21
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #21
looking at these numbers the head to intake ports are roughly the same size on the explorer/stock intakes. I always thought the explorer/gt40 lower would have bigger ports, I guess there is just less material from the top of the runner to the bottom of the port and that makes it look larger. my crystal ball says Tmoss will be along anytime now. I bet he loves the metric system too.
 

backfocus

Member
Sep 3, 2004
254
3
18
Little Rock, AR
Jan 24, 2008
#22
  • Jan 24, 2008
  • #22
Hey David,

Since the motor is not fully back together yet here are some GT40 #s.

Top is 42mm or 1 21/32"

Bottom

Across: 25mm or 31/32"

Length: 48mm or 1 7/8"

I measured a few different ones and all were the same as far as the openings.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 25, 2008
#23
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #23
AHA!! another non canadian using the metric system!!!
wow, I would have thought the lower castings for the explorer/gt40 would have been siamese twins, but the gt40 has ports 1.5 times bigger.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 25, 2008
#24
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #24
Thanks Mike Are you going to get that thing running before Spring gets here? Do you know the average runner length of the GT-40 intake?

So we have measurements for a stock intake, explorer intake, and GT-40 intake.

Anyone else care to add to the list?

On a side note, has anyone ever measured the volume of one of their runners?

I think it would be pretty cool to get some average cross section numbers for the intakes. Just need runner lengths (which I have) and the volume of the runner in cubic centimeters.
 

backfocus

Member
Sep 3, 2004
254
3
18
Little Rock, AR
Jan 25, 2008
#25
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #25
No it probably won't be running by spring. My hope is by fall, I would like to take it up to Springfield in September for the Street Machine Nationals. My wife tends to get me side tracked on home improvement projects and I haven't had much time to work on the car. Engine Bay is in the process of filling and painting and I am saving up for the turbo, so I can have it all in at the same time. As spring approaches even that time line is ambitious.

Did you want the length of the lower intake runners or the upper? I will measure them when I get home, which may be awhile since all the stupid people are out because of the ice.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 25, 2008
#26
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #26
I would be interested in seeing the numbers from a truck lower. I hear the runners are much bigger than a stock HO intake.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Jan 25, 2008
#27
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #27
stykthyn said:
explorer = 30mm across on the top port on the 3rd runner
bottom runner 15x26 mm

stock bottom intake
top port on 3rd runner = 18x24mm
bottom 3rd runner =26x14

3rd runner on stock upper=25x19

my explorer upper is not where I can measure it right now sorry
Click to expand...

backfocus said:
Hey David,

Since the motor is not fully back together yet here are some GT40 #s.

Top is 42mm or 1 21/32"

Bottom

Across: 25mm or 31/32"

Length: 48mm or 1 7/8"

I measured a few different ones and all were the same as far as the openings.
Click to expand...

This can not be right. I didn't think it was so I googled "GT40 vs explorer intake" b/c I wanted to see a side by side. But I found this. Look at the dyno chart, then this is what Tmoss himself wrote on allfordmustangs "Gt40/Cobra/Explorer all flow within a couple of cfm of each other - and if you've seen that old 1996 test on Eddelbrock's website - don't believe it as it has been proven wrong over and over and over......"

Somebody's measuring method is flawed here.

 

Attachments

  • 14240d1140139921-cobra-vs-gt-40-intake-afm-dyno-cobra-explorer-gt40.webp
    55.4 KB · Views: 144

backfocus

Member
Sep 3, 2004
254
3
18
Little Rock, AR
Jan 25, 2008
#28
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #28
This can not be right. I didn't think it was so I googled "GT40 vs explorer intake" b/c I wanted to see a side by side. But I found this. Look at the dyno chart, then this is what Tmoss himself wrote on allfordmustangs "Gt40/Cobra/Explorer all flow within a couple of cfm of each other - and if you've seen that old 1996 test on Eddelbrock's website - don't believe it as it has been proven wrong over and over and over......"

Somebody's measuring method is flawed here.
Click to expand...

After looking at the numbers I am questioning it myself, as I have seen that article before too. Althought we are also just talking about the lower as that article refers to the horse power and torque numbers which include top and bottom. Which to me even though they look alike, I have a hard time believing the runners are the same length and size.

I will measure again on several different runners this evening to double check. I am interested in this as well.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 25, 2008
#29
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #29
We are getting some good feedback

Mike, the actual runner length should begin just a little ways into the upper intake (from the bottom). That should be a shorter measurement because the runner length begins in the upper intake where the air leaves the open plenum.

Then you add the actual lower intake runner length, which should be longer.

On each of the measurements use tight string (no stretch) or tape to get the short and long sides and then average them together.

My guess is that the GT-40 intake is 15 or so inches.

The best place to measure easily should be the very top of the runner where the upper meets, and the very bottom of the runner where it meets the head so we can have a little bit of consistency. I will get all these measurements together at a later time.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 25, 2008
#30
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #30
Trickflow Street Heat

Top

Width - 1.20" -1.22"

Length - 2.01"-2.08"

Bottom

Width - 1.193 (1.2")

Length 2.0

So has anyone ever measured a runner volume?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 25, 2008
#31
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #31
I used a tape measure nothing fancy.I measured again and got the same answers.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 25, 2008
#32
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #32
stykthyn said:
I used a tape measure nothing fancy.I measured again and got the same answers.
Click to expand...

Hey, do you think you can just measure the lower intakes of your stock intake and the lower intake on the explorer.

You just measure the short side and the long side, then average them.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jan 25, 2008
#33
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #33
i have a trickflow box R if you want the measurements
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 25, 2008
#34
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #34
1991vert said:
i have a trickflow box R if you want the measurements
Click to expand...

Absolutely

If you can just get the most accurate measurements you can at one of the middle/end runners, for the port entrance and port exit.

I think the entire runner length (upper plus lower) is 11". Can you also get just the lower intake runner length?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 25, 2008
#35
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #35
5spd GT said:
Hey, do you think you can just measure the lower intakes of your stock intake and the lower intake on the explorer.

You just measure the short side and the long side, then average them.
Click to expand...

you've lost me. you want the area of the mating surfaces?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 25, 2008
#36
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #36
stykthyn said:
you've lost me. you want the area of the mating surfaces?
Click to expand...

My bad, I am looking for the LENGTH of just the lower intake runners. You measure from the top of a runner through the intake and out the bottom to the end of that port.

You do that on the short side and the long side, and then average them

It could be 10" or so, no telling.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 25, 2008
#37
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #37
am I following the curve in the wall or straight through?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,944
224
Massachusetts
Jan 25, 2008
#38
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #38
stykthyn said:
damn, I couldnt bring myself to do it, so I'll come out and say it ...I LOVE THE METRIC SYSTEM!!!! god I am such a dork.thanks a lot guys, that took a load off my chest, I need some beer now.
Click to expand...



I love the metric system as well.

I'm an engineer, and the metric system is just so much easier to use.

I do most of my designs and measurements in cm/mm if i can get away with it.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jan 25, 2008
#39
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #39
i'll do it tomorrow, but the lower is already bolted to the motor. the thing JUST barely cleared my hood. i might need it milled the tiniest bit.
 

backfocus

Member
Sep 3, 2004
254
3
18
Little Rock, AR
Jan 25, 2008
#40
  • Jan 25, 2008
  • #40
Ok David, I think I did the measuring as you were asking. Follow along with my math and we will see.

Lower GT 40 I measured last night and checked again today measuring 4 runners all the same.

Top opening is 42mm or 1 21/32"

Bottom Port
:

Across: 25mm or 31/32"

Length: 48mm or 1 7/8"

Length of Lower runner 127mm or 5" that is an average and it was consistent on different runners.


Upper GT 40 :

From the open plenum to the bottom where the upper meets the lower.

Top measurement 254mm or 10"
Bottom measurement 186mm or 7 11/32"

Average for Upper GT40 runnner is 220mm

Add the Upper runner lenght 220mm and lower runner length 127mm and that is 347mm or 13.66"

So yes it is close to the 15" you guessed. Let me know if you need something different.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Someone help me understand this, Intake opening to throttle body opening
  • from6to8
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2025
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
903
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?