• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Who has got an intake ready to install...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5spd GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 26, 2008
#41
  • Jan 26, 2008
  • #41
explorer lower runner is 5" and just like backfocus found, all the runners were within a few mm of each other. there isnt a real variation like the stock intake where I noticed that some runners were up to an inch longer than the rest
the stock intake runners averaged out at 6"

on another note
I love the metric system as well.

I'm an engineer, and the metric system is just so much easier to use.

I do most of my designs and measurements in cm/mm if i can get away with it.
Click to expand...

FINALLY!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 26, 2008
#42
  • Jan 26, 2008
  • #42
stykthyn - You follow the curve walls of the intake. You end up taking two measurements, then add them together and divide by 2 to get the average

Mike - Very nice That is some good info.

1991vert - I believe the stock measurements on the TFS-R for the bottom ports are 2.00" x 1.20", so if you could just get some good accurate info on the top lower intake ports
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 26, 2008
#43
  • Jan 26, 2008
  • #43
1991vert - Any updates
 

Black1987Stang

Active Member
Aug 22, 2004
1,422
0
37
Jersey Shore
Jan 27, 2008
#44
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #44
I got a Trickflow trackheat if you want those numbers also, I have a dial caliper
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 27, 2008
#45
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #45
That would be good

Numbers from one of the middle ports would be pretty nice.

Also, measuring just the lower intakes runner length would be benefecial, unless you can access both the lower runners and upper runners.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Jan 27, 2008
#46
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #46
I got measurements from my Systemax upper/lower and truck lower/Saleen upper. The intakes are pretty much identical, and the uppers/lowers of each are interchangeable. My caliper is at work so I did this in mm with a tape measure then converted.

Systemax lower topside:
Length-60mm/2.36"
Width-35mm/1.38"
Systemax lower bottom:
Length-55mm/2.17"
Width-30mm/1.18"

The truck lower measures identical on the top side, but the bottom is a little smaller.
Bottom:
Length-50mm/1.97"
Width-30mm/1.18"

The uppers measure identically. I wish I had the Saleen lower for comparison.

Edit: Measurements are from a middle runner. The length looks to be about the same as the others previously mentioned. I'd say about 5"
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 27, 2008
#47
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #47
Good stuff
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jan 31, 2008
#48
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #48
keep in mind there is an adapter plate which lets the complete "upper" part bolt to the lower intake manifold.

-Adapter plate: 1.0"

-Top of "Ribs" on upper intake to ground, including adapter: 7 7/8" tall

-Flat part of upper intake (above throttle body opening) to ground: 7 1/2"tall

-Runner Length from adapter plate to where the runners form inside the upper: 5 1/4"

-Runner Openings 2 3/8" X 1 3/8"

for clearance purposes, i don't see why the adapter plate couldn't be milled 1/4" to 1/2". it must be milled from the UPPER INTAKE SIDE. the allen head bolts which mate the adapter plate and upper intake bolt in from the bottom and are counter-sunk; the otherside is flat.

hope this helps ya out
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Someone help me understand this, Intake opening to throttle body opening
  • from6to8
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 12, 2025
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
900
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?