• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Why only the 460 BB in a Fox?

  • Thread starter Thread starter willys1
  • Start date Start date Jan 29, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Jan 30, 2006
#41
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #41
How would the torque from a 460 compare to say a 408, 418, 427 stroked 351w? The 460 has a stroke of 3.85" right? Compared to a 4.0, 4.1, 4.17 inch strokes in the windors.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jan 30, 2006
#42
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #42
comparible torque numbers. if they are both built engines.
 

FORCED2DV8

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
458
0
0
Grand Rapids MI
Jan 30, 2006
#43
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #43
Actual 429 heads are extremely rare... They can be used on a 460 block with the appropriate crank to make a 429, also 427 428. It would be nice to see these in a fox, Get the new issues of HOT ROD They build a 429 out of a 460. Check it Out
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Jan 30, 2006
#44
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #44
Here`s a list of all the FE engine sizes ever produced by Ford out of a book I have here.

332,352,360,361,390,391,406,410,427,428

The 360 FE went into pickup trucks.The 361 and 391 went into heavier trucks.

The FE series are tough engines,but the regular non-side oiler versions have a very poor oil system from the factory that should definately be modified/improved during a rebuild.
 

90NotchBack

New Member
Feb 15, 2004
306
2
0
Loxahatchee/Pembroke Pines, FL
Jan 30, 2006
#45
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • #45
I run a 390 in my Falcon. They are storng and will last a long time if you know how to build them right. My motor has been in my car for 6 years and still going 11.50's. My boss has two FE motor for his 69 Mustang. He has a 428 that goes 10.90's and he drive it on the street and he also has a 427 Tunnle port motor with a 428 crank which makes it 454ci and it goes 10.0's. We have about 20 block, heads and rod laying around for FE. After this season I'm taking out the FE and putting a 503ci motor.
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Jan 31, 2006
#46
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #46
So 385 series engines can't rev huh? Heres a 429 mildly built fox taching 8,000 rpms at the track:

http://www.northcoastmusclecar.com/CCV/fordzillaincar.wmv

whoever said that 429s and 460s can;t rev, your full of ****. with a stock crank, good rods, and light pistons, you can safely rev to ~6500, stock main caps too. Power on the stock crank is limited to around 700-800 hp, the block can still take more, try that with a stock 302 block and crank. for only a few hundred dollars, i can throw in a 4.3" stroker crank to make around 521ci like most people do.

Everything is interchangeable on 429s and 460s except for the cranks, you can put a 429 crank in either factory built combo, but you can't put the 460 crank in a factory 429 block for some reason.

An FE fox would be pretty neat, but the cost would outweigh the benfits, unless your rich and have lots of time on your hande to hunt down FE parts. Plus, you need to fab everything to make it fit, as for exhaust, good luck.

I'd like to see a BOSS 429 in a fox. Thats rare.
 

bobcatv8

Member
Aug 25, 2004
141
1
16
Ocala,FL
Jan 31, 2006
#47
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #47
The Gopher is right!
The potential for the 385 series engine is fanatastic. If I was going to run a BB, the 385 is the way to go, and I raced FE's for years before they got stupidly priced and always knew they were not as good as the 385's for poor mans racing. With all the aftermarket heads and stroker combos available to turn a 460 into a monster now it would make no economic or power sense to run an old FE in a Fox. I have nothing against the FE's, they are near and dear to me but the facts is what they is! I know ALL about the oiling mods that have to be made on an FE and have done many of them back in the day. However, don't underestimate the power potential of the old dinosaur FE, or one might bite you in the butt!

BTW, the 370 is indeed a 385 series engine, only put in heavy trucks, {600 series and up} for many years starting in 1979.
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Jan 31, 2006
#48
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #48
My 466:

I only spent ~$6500 to swap everything into my car and i can safely rev to 6,000+ rpms because i built it with a light rotating assembly and I completely rebuilt it with performance parts, and set it up for the future. I'll say it again, it surpassed my expectations and im very very happy with how streetable it is (minus the gas consumption) and how much power it has instantly, it can rev pretty damn fast, most of you have heard it.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Jan 31, 2006
#49
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #49
What`s the difference in weight between the FE and 385 series big blocks.

I`ve heard the FE is lighter,(surprisingly),by a fair amount.Anyone know the factory engine weights w/cast iron intakes/heads between FE and 385 series engines?
 

timewarped1972

Member
Jun 17, 2004
642
0
16
mesa, az
Jan 31, 2006
#50
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #50
i think a FE weighs about 700 pounds. the cast iron intake manifolds weigh about 75 pounds, so an aftermarked shaves probably 40 or 50 off that. probably where the FE also gains some weight is the block. it extends down past the crank centerline, as where the 385 and others the pan skirts stop about crank centerline.....i have no idea what a 385 weighs but i'd immagine in the 6's......
 

90NotchBack

New Member
Feb 15, 2004
306
2
0
Loxahatchee/Pembroke Pines, FL
Jan 31, 2006
#51
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #51
Here is a pic of my FE intake. It's big, a cast iron one you will need two guys to pull one off a motor. The intake is half the of the head also. If you can see that the top of the valve cover bolts to the top of the intake. This is the intake I took off my motor.

This is the one I put on it.

This is what it looked like before I did all the work to it.
 
F

fiveohGT

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
353
1
0
Fairfax Virginia
Jan 31, 2006
#52
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #52
ExplodingGopher said:
My 466:

I only spent ~$6500 to swap everything into my car and i can safely rev to 6,000+ rpms because i built it with a light rotating assembly and I completely rebuilt it with performance parts, and set it up for the future. I'll say it again, it surpassed my expectations and im very very happy with how streetable it is (minus the gas consumption) and how much power it has instantly, it can rev pretty damn fast, most of you have heard it.
Click to expand...

Just out of curiosity....what is your gas mileage in that beast?
 

timewarped1972

Member
Jun 17, 2004
642
0
16
mesa, az
Jan 31, 2006
#53
  • Jan 31, 2006
  • #53
90NotchBack said:
Here is a pic of my FE intake. It's big, a cast iron one you will need two guys to pull one off a motor. The intake is half the of the head also. If you can see that the top of the valve cover bolts to the top of the intake.


i've done the manifold on the FE a few times by myself, you don't need 2 people as long as your extremely pissed off.............lol
Click to expand...
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Feb 1, 2006
#54
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #54
Gopher,the FE can revv to,as a matter of fact it can revv right on by a 385 BB

Just think 427 Cammer (SOHC)

7500rpm's out of the factory

To bad not many were made..oh well.

Oh course,for all out racing,yea the 385 series is better...just throw on the Hemi heads,a blower,and mech injection pumping meth
 

ExplodingGopher

New Member
Jun 11, 2004
517
0
0
The mistake on the lake (Ohio)
Feb 1, 2006
#55
  • Feb 1, 2006
  • #55
fiveohGT said:
Just out of curiosity....what is your gas mileage in that beast?
Click to expand...

I'd say right around 5-7 mpg if i dont romp on it. 3-4mpg if i want to have some fun. Even with my 3000 stall and mild/wild cam, it still behaves great.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
L
I’m Curious —-Why a Fox?
  • LAFF
  • Jan 5, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
129
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 2, 2023
Mhalc1
Getting my car decent. Looking for thoughts on this long list.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 10, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2020
Mustang5L5
'87 Coupe Going Under The Knife... Looking For A Good Forum
  • NickPohlAandP
  • Sep 5, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 7 8 9
Replies
161
Views
15K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 24, 2017
NickPohlAandP
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?