• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

1/8th mile times with Mongoose kit.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaNd4Speed
  • Start date Start date Oct 30, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Oct 30, 2006
#21
  • Oct 30, 2006
  • #21
BennyBlown2v said:
Then why is it my 423rwhp car runs 12.55's on a race prepped track (ORP prepped for the MAC Tools US Nationals LOL) with 1.78 60', 112mph trap (average)? Granted I'm on stock 3.27's, and most gear I've ever run are 3.55's (running 12.5's@115mph). Fact is non-intercooled FI cars don't run as fast at comparable dyno power levels as intercooled and NA setups. When going through 4 gears the intake charge just gets hotter and hotter losing lots power - I might make 400+ on the dyno, but at the track its more like 380 after 3rd. These cars are piggies too, it's not like a fox where 400hp gets you deep into the tens.

I also have no traction in 2nd on MT et street radials...so that might have something to do with it though...lol
Click to expand...


Im honestly not too sure. I THINK its the gears, it is too tall for the high RPM centri style S/Cs....just not getting enough pull when you shift to the next gear. I understand your reasoning though with your statement, and if I were in your shoes I would have said the same thing. I also think your right about the heat....and it applies even more so in your case because it is SOO hot with your extra few #s of boost.

BTW my car weighed in @ 3250 at FULL weight and a FULL tank of gas....thats only 100#s more than a TWO SEATER 02-04 fiberglass Z06, and 120# more than a TWO SEATER 06 Z06 that has some crazy light aluminum (?) frame, a fiberglass/carbon fiber body and an all aluminum V8 thats MUCH lighter than our motors . IMHO thats not too bad at all.

Only the cobras and verts are the pigs...GT coupes are pretty light. (Note I have a tubular K...but also have DD rear bullitts)

After the twins, car should weigh around 3350#s. Really about 200#s heaver than the Z06 .

Oh and yea foxed can be EASILY made to be 2800#s...but they also dont have all the comphort that we have. Id take an 11 second 04 GT over a 10 second notch anyday. Kinda like that 10 second RX7 your friend has.

I PERSONALLY would take your car over his in a heart beat. His car is a plain looking 80s style RX7 with a powerful motor....big deal. Like a 9 second civic, sure its fast but thats about it. Your car is an awsome looking mustang with attitude AND power.
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
Oct 31, 2006
#22
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #22
BennyBlown2v said:
Then why is it my 423rwhp car runs 12.55's on a race prepped track (ORP prepped for the MAC Tools US Nationals LOL) with 1.78 60', 112mph trap (average)? Granted I'm on stock 3.27's, and most gear I've ever run are 3.55's (running 12.5's@115mph). Fact is non-intercooled FI cars don't run as fast at comparable dyno power levels as intercooled and NA setups. When going through 4 gears the intake charge just gets hotter and hotter losing lots power - I might make 400+ on the dyno, but at the track its more like 380 after 3rd. These cars are piggies too, it's not like a fox where 400hp gets you deep into the tens.

I also have no traction in 2nd on MT et street radials...so that might have something to do with it though...lol
Click to expand...
All the more reason why i'll be running an intercooler with my Vortech, especially down here in this Houston heat
Is it the Paxton intercooler that can be made to work with the Vortech? And is it a direct fit or requires a bunch of fabrication. If its not a direct fit, i'd probably be better off peicing together my own kit
 

Team Ford

Member
Dec 16, 2005
109
3
19
Oct 31, 2006
#23
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #23
Nice Trap speed!

Looks like you need some slicks to get that 60' down.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Oct 31, 2006
#24
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #24
my non intercooled car went 119 untuned....and 11:1 a/f
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Oct 31, 2006
#25
  • Oct 31, 2006
  • #25
I'd say mid-ish 12's. ie 12.4's-12.6's.
 

QuickCapri83

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
80
0
0
North East, PA
Nov 2, 2006
#26
  • Nov 2, 2006
  • #26
Now I'm really interested. I want to see what it runs, when are you going out again, soon? I'm gonna say ...ehh, as follows, 60 foot -2, 12.6-12.8-powershift possibly a 12.4 best, 60 foot 2-/+ lookin high 12's. Don't be surprised if best trap comes on a bad ET.

Lets just bet 12.76@114-16 Now I'm assuming temps less than 65. If you're lucky and you're up here in the NE you got some nice cold air coming in this weekend, very arctic air. A good bit more dense, just feels your kitchen floor with your palm at night, cold..race!

When I raced my friends saab, as it is in that one pic I posted, riding on dampers tightened all the way down( he's an idiot) on full coil over suspension (FK Silverline, same as my VR) and FK exhaust, I finally got a decent launch with the damn heavy fwd thing, and first gear was a bit back and forth, sliding down to an even redline, no hop or bad burn, second came, hooked up and then one slight bump and I get a wheel hop and the car's pulling left, no way I'm disqualifying I'm racing a brand new stock RSX-S, got out of it a little it found it's way, hammered it and it did a great job staying on line, through 3rd, considering my first ride, and stiff as hell, 18 1/2 lbs boost, trapped 106 pulled a 13.7. This car with a suitable driver and colder air is an easy 12 second car. Didn't have the LSD in, and was on stock clutch, turbo was new and IC was side mount custom, nice. Tranny is blown now, saab trannys = dont even race stock, touring only. I actually ran nearly as well with the VR, which spins through second even with a 1500 dollar LSD setup with 3:94's and a Passat TDI 5th gear. Ehh, talk to much, tired, continue tomorow. Tips advice appreciated.

Oh I've found a way to launch my stang on stock 245/45/17's with cheap tires, at 3500rpm, rpm rise and fall quick, grab and rip out of first like a bastard, hit second like an Irishman's wife and it's all butter after then. Heh, it's nice, I can save, and wait to buy P-zero-nero's, they work beautifull on the GTI, a little hop coming out of corners, like right out of the apex, but with a little rip to the right 10% and back and feel through the back tires for a moment to set her straight, she holds her line straight down. Nothing like a mustang, everexistent torquesteer, however, I think half the fun is studying a cars behavior and mastering it. It's just tire pressure and damper standards that mess me up.


:SNSign:
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Top End Kit or Supercharger?
  • 93gtmustang
  • Feb 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
58
Views
7K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 2, 2024
Bullitt347
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?