• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

.544 lift with AFR's

  • Thread starter Thread starter Billy88LX
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

Billy88LX

Founding Member
May 1, 2001
157
0
17
Alberta, Canada
Jun 1, 2005
#1
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #1
Would .544 lift be too much with with afr's stock .550 lift spring's? These are afr165 pedestal mount. Afr said that it's too much and that I'll be wearing my spring's out faster and I should upgrade. Why do they say thier good up to .550 lift then if they can't handle it? I'm concerned about valve float too. I'm only taking it to 5800-6000rpm. Anyone have any problem's with this lift?
 

Stang8URMPRT

Active Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,100
1
38
Daytona Beach, FL
Jun 1, 2005
#2
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • #2
Cause it's a roller cam.. the ramp rate is much faster then, say a flat tappet.You will probably valve float at 5500 rpm. Def. upgrade the springs. You'll be glad you did.
 
B

Billy88LX

Founding Member
May 1, 2001
157
0
17
Alberta, Canada
Jun 2, 2005
#3
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #3
ttt
 

Stang8URMPRT

Active Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,100
1
38
Daytona Beach, FL
Jun 2, 2005
#4
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #4
ttt for you since you don't take advice. Let someone else tell ya what I did.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jun 2, 2005
#5
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #5
Stang8URMPRT said:
ttt for you since you don't take advice. Let someone else tell ya what I did.
Click to expand...


A general rule for me is to stay clear of maximums / minimums by 10%.... Just to be on the safe side and hey I am conservative but I haven't dropped a valve yet or blown the pants off any motor that I have built and driven the snot out of.

Get the upgrade...


Edit: I can't type tonight.
 

Stang8URMPRT

Active Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,100
1
38
Daytona Beach, FL
Jun 2, 2005
#6
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #6
Yep, especially with AFR's stock springs. I'd get the upgrade no matter even if I was using the stock roller cam.
 

jb89coupe

New Member
Sep 3, 2004
416
0
0
CT
Jun 2, 2005
#7
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #7
Definately get the upgrade. People complain about those springs with much less lift than that.

:OT:
Stang8 - I just threw up in my mouth a little thanks to your avatar
 

Stang8URMPRT

Active Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,100
1
38
Daytona Beach, FL
Jun 2, 2005
#8
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #8
 
B

Blown stocker

New Member
May 2, 2005
11
0
0
Jun 2, 2005
#9
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #9
I put together a dss 306 with afr 165 and comp extreme energy cam 545 and 555 and my buddy shifts it at 6000 all day long with no valve float. maybe he just happened to get a good set though.
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
Jun 2, 2005
#10
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #10
hey are the springs on the AFR 205's crap too? even just for .560 lift?
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Jun 2, 2005
#11
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #11
if you don't want to spend arm and a leg on springs...Ford Racing makes a set that have a higher spring pressure...135# on the seat unlike the ones from AFR that are 120...the Ford Racing springs can support .600 and they are like $70 form Summit...I have them on my 165's...no probs yet...I also run them on my X heads as well...can't beat the price...I would definatly upgrade the springs...don't cheap out...or else you will pay so much more once you drop a valve...or worse...
 
B

Billy88LX

Founding Member
May 1, 2001
157
0
17
Alberta, Canada
Jun 2, 2005
#12
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #12
Another thing I'm concerned about is if I upgrade my springs I'm running pedestal mount. A local speed shop told me that I could rip them out of there with a higher spring pressure. I know springs are cheap to upgrade but now this speed shop is talking stud conv,springs,pushrod, stud rockers. Could this be another problem?
 

Stang8URMPRT

Active Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,100
1
38
Daytona Beach, FL
Jun 2, 2005
#13
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #13
No. If you were running a solid roller cam, then MAYBE... but highly unlikely. A stud goes in the same hole, and if they don't "rip" out, I wouldn't see how a ped bolt would.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 2, 2005
#14
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #14
The 205 springs are decent, I assume you mean the .650 soild roller model.

Upgrade the springs for that cam, the stock one tend to be on the weak side. Contact Ed Curtis he has the ones you need on the shelf...
 

bgjohnson

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
963
0
16
johnston,iowa
Jun 2, 2005
#15
  • Jun 2, 2005
  • #15
Rick 91GT said:
The 205 springs are decent, I assume you mean the .650 soild roller model.

Upgrade the springs for that cam, the stock one tend to be on the weak side. Contact Ed Curtis he has the ones you need on the shelf...
Click to expand...


so I don't need to upgrade the springs for the AFR 205's? for a trickflow stg2 cam?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 3, 2005
#16
  • Jun 3, 2005
  • #16
I'd still upgrade them...controlling the movement of the valve is VERY IMPORTANT.
 
B

Billy88LX

Founding Member
May 1, 2001
157
0
17
Alberta, Canada
Jun 4, 2005
#17
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #17
I thought stud mount are supposed to be stronger than pedestal mount. So I wouldn't have a problem pulling them out?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 4, 2005
#18
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • #18
Billy88LX said:
I thought stud mount are supposed to be stronger than pedestal mount. So I wouldn't have a problem pulling them out?
Click to expand...


They are
 

glenn95gt

Founding Member
Oct 15, 2001
420
0
0
Bay Area, California
Jun 5, 2005
#19
  • Jun 5, 2005
  • #19
www.flowtechunduction.com has springs that will be a direct repalcement for the AFR's.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jun 5, 2005
#20
  • Jun 5, 2005
  • #20
glenn95gt said:
www.flowtechunduction.com has springs that will be a direct repalcement for the AFR's.
Click to expand...


It is www.flowtechinduction.com I use a lot of springs from Ed for customers AFR's when matched to one of his cams very nice.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
426
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?