• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

89 Foxbody W/ 03 Irs Wheel Fitment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael West
  • Start date Start date Jan 11, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 12, 2014
#21
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #21
Here is some fat tire IRS eye candy
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 12, 2014
#22
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #22
stykthyn said:
Here is some fat tire IRS eye candy
Click to expand...

I don't know that they are really that wide, i think the car is just real low and the wheels stick out a little.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Jan 12, 2014
#23
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #23
not sure on the specs. they look like 285s. they are on a set of 3 piece ccws.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 12, 2014
#24
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #24
Not sure, looks like the tires are too narrow for the wheels, a lot of sidewall visible from rear on those.
My 275's i've been waiting to put on. My current pair is a mess, just want to put on the PHB first.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
www.cardomain.com
Jan 12, 2014
#25
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #25
Those are the same 275's I have waiting to go on mine as well. Such pretty drag radials.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 12, 2014
#26
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #26
RacEoHolic330 said:
Those are the same 275's I have waiting to go on mine as well. Such pretty drag radials.
Click to expand...

They really are, so perfectly flat all the way across.
I got good mileage and years out of the first set for how i drive.
I actually get more mileage on drag radials because they spin less and i'm more conscious of wearing them down.
 

Michael West

Member
Jun 11, 2013
41
2
9
31
Jan 12, 2014
#27
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #27
I've seen that car. It's actually on 255's all the way around with 10" rims and 25mm offset. I don't know how he did it, but he did lol
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 12, 2014
#28
  • Jan 12, 2014
  • #28
Michael West said:
I've seen that car. It's actually on 255's all the way around with 10" rims and 25mm offset. I don't know how he did it, but he did lol
Click to expand...

It works because the rim stretches the tire lowering the profile and taking the edge away that would normally rub.
Not the best for contact patch and traction. A 255 is way too small for 10 inch wheel.
 

Michael West

Member
Jun 11, 2013
41
2
9
31
Jan 13, 2014
#29
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #29
2000xp8 said:
It works because the rim stretches the tire lowering the profile and taking the edge away that would normally rub.
Not the best for contact patch and traction. A 255 is way too small for 10 inch wheel.
Click to expand...

Quick question..

Found these rims.. They only make 18x9.5 with 6.63 back spacing and 35mm offset. How do you think they'd sit on my car in the rear? Would they rub the quarters pretty hard? If I were to run a 255 tire? Or possibly 265 if that would be better. And if I had my fenders professionally rolled.

http://www.nlmotoring.com/XXR-531-Wheels-18x9-5-Platinum-p/53189100.htm
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 13, 2014
#30
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #30
Michael West said:
Quick question..

Found these rims.. They only make 18x9.5 with 6.63 back spacing and 35mm offset. How do you think they'd sit on my car in the rear? Would they rub the quarters pretty hard? If I were to run a 255 tire? Or possibly 265 if that would be better. And if I had my fenders professionally rolled.

http://www.nlmotoring.com/XXR-531-Wheels-18x9-5-Platinum-p/53189100.htm
Click to expand...

I personally wouldn't do it.

Sometimes wheels and tires are a risk/reward type of mod. No risk and you stand to be common or plain, if it works you could be great and different.
With that said, if it doesn't work, you are out a ton on tires and rims.

Also, if you have to tweak a setup on a non daily driver it's not a big deal. If it's your everyday car you could be in trouble.

I've long thought 9's should be the largest wheel someone should add to a fox. Gives you a little room to add tire or take it away.

IMO 9.5's are pushing it. Not sure how a 265 is going to look on a 9.5 considering i run a 275 on an 8.5, you are doing a lot less tire on a lot more wheel.

Sounds like you are in it for the wheels not the tires, which is good thing, but i still wouldn't try it.

But nothing ventured nothing gained, so...
 

Michael West

Member
Jun 11, 2013
41
2
9
31
Jan 13, 2014
#31
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #31
2000xp8 said:
I personally wouldn't do it.

Sometimes wheels and tires are a risk/reward type of mod. No risk and you stand to be common or plain, if it works you could be great and different.
With that said, if it doesn't work, you are out a ton on tires and rims.

Also, if you have to tweak a setup on a non daily driver it's not a big deal. If it's your everyday car you could be in trouble.

I've long thought 9's should be the largest wheel someone should add to a fox. Gives you a little room to add tire or take it away.

IMO 9.5's are pushing it. Not sure how a 265 is going to look on a 9.5 considering i run a 275 on an 8.5, you are doing a lot less tire on a lot more wheel.

Sounds like you are in it for the wheels not the tires, which is good thing, but i still wouldn't try it.

But nothing ventured nothing gained, so...
Click to expand...

Yeah your right. It's a big risk to take. they also have 8.5" ones. Maybe I'll just go 8.5" all around with 255's all around. Atleast while the cars my daily..
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
www.cardomain.com
Jan 13, 2014
#32
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #32
Those will put the tire right under the edge of the wheel well and basically sit flush with the quarter. An undersized tire like a 255 will help them look a little less flush.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jan 13, 2014
#33
  • Jan 13, 2014
  • #33
225 is the stock width for the fox 16x7 wheel. I am running 245s on sn95 2000 gt 17x8 wheels up front with my 95 cobra spindles. I am lowered roughly 1.5 inches up front. Rears with the same wheels and IRS do rub a tad. I will probably end up rolling the fender. The inner bolt is the real issue. Even with the SN95 backspacing, I only have about an inch clearance from the tire and the IRS cradle bolt. MM sells the domed bolt as seen above in the pic but I noticed that the bolt is a bit weaker than the stock ones. I was able to mar the threads trying to install the IRS by myself and the MM bolts.
Kevin
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Jan 14, 2014
#34
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #34
2000xp8 said:
Not sure, looks like the tires are too narrow for the wheels, a lot of sidewall visible from rear on those.
My 275's i've been waiting to put on. My current pair is a mess, just want to put on the PHB first.
Click to expand...



They do look good!!!! might be my next pair, after going thru 3 sets of 275 nitto 555 drag radials the only good thing i can say about them is they last long on the street. Anybody know how those BFG hold up compared to the 555drs.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Jan 14, 2014
#35
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #35
89stang1 said:
They do look good!!!! might be my next pair, after going thru 3 sets of 275 nitto 555 drag radials the only good thing i can say about them is they last long on the street. Anybody know how those BFG hold up compared to the 555drs.
Click to expand...

I've had the nitto's in the past.

Depends on how you use the BFG's.
My car never sees rain, so i wear them down to there is nothing left.
Try that on a car that is driven in the rain and you will get killed.

I'd say 5-10,000 miles depending on how you treat them.
Nitto's last a little longer, but not enough IMO to warrant less traction.

Last time i checked the nittos were alot more expensive too.
 

89stang1

Stroked and Juiced
10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2008
730
234
74
nj
Jan 14, 2014
#36
  • Jan 14, 2014
  • #36
2000xp8 said:
I've had the nitto's in the past.

Depends on how you use the BFG's.
My car never sees rain, so i wear them down to there is nothing left.
Try that on a car that is driven in the rain and you will get killed.

I'd say 5-10,000 miles depending on how you treat them.
Nitto's last a little longer, but not enough IMO to warrant less traction.

Last time i checked the nittos were alot more expensive too.
Click to expand...



thanks for info.. bfg is one of the only DRs i have never had
 

Michael West

Member
Jun 11, 2013
41
2
9
31
Jan 16, 2014
#37
  • Jan 16, 2014
  • #37
RacEoHolic330 said:
Those will put the tire right under the edge of the wheel well and basically sit flush with the quarter. An undersized tire like a 255 will help them look a little less flush.
Click to expand...

I'm about to order these rims.. I just want to make sure they will fit and didn't want to start a new thread.. I'm gonna go with 8.5" all around on 245 tires. Will these fit on the rear of my car without sticking out past the fender? 6.13 back spacing 35mm offset and 18x8.5

http://www.nlmotoring.com/XXR-531-Wheels-18x8-5-Platinum-p/53188100.htm
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
www.cardomain.com
Jan 16, 2014
#38
  • Jan 16, 2014
  • #38
Those will definitely not stick out past the fender with that backspacing. Those wheels would sit in about 1/4" more than mine, so you will be okay.
 

Michael West

Member
Jun 11, 2013
41
2
9
31
Jan 16, 2014
#39
  • Jan 16, 2014
  • #39
RacEoHolic330 said:
Those will definitely not stick out past the fender with that backspacing. Those wheels would sit in about 1/4" more than mine, so you will be okay.
Click to expand...

Ok thanks man! I really appreciate it, and good luck with your badass car!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
430
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
119
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
420
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?