- Jun 11, 2005
- 18
- 0
- 0
Been busy for a few days so I didn't get to respond to any posts. Anyways, to answer a few questions:
When I bought the car, that is what the sticker on the side said. I may be wrong, so I'll stick it on the car stands in a few days and rotate the tires a few times to find out. Thanks for pointing that out.
Like I mentioned earlier, they had to shut it down @4700 rpm due to detonation, so I have more power left in there when I fix the detonation issues.
As for the torque, corrected for 20% DL, it comes to 278 ft-lbs. Aren't they rated for around 285? If so, I am not too far off, but again, had to cut out early on the dyno.
Unfortunatly, no.
BTW, if it means anything, the dyno was done on a wideband (Inertia dyno?) dyno.
tomustang
weird that you have an auto with 2.73's on a 98.
When I bought the car, that is what the sticker on the side said. I may be wrong, so I'll stick it on the car stands in a few days and rotate the tires a few times to find out. Thanks for pointing that out.
stangGT97
doesnt a stock 98 auto dyno at like 180 rwhp? and your torque seems very low as well... theres something fishy with that, can anyone confirm my suspicion?
Like I mentioned earlier, they had to shut it down @4700 rpm due to detonation, so I have more power left in there when I fix the detonation issues.
As for the torque, corrected for 20% DL, it comes to 278 ft-lbs. Aren't they rated for around 285? If so, I am not too far off, but again, had to cut out early on the dyno.
98MACH1R
do you know what the #`s were before the install?
Unfortunatly, no.
BTW, if it means anything, the dyno was done on a wideband (Inertia dyno?) dyno.