• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Big Block 427 Exhuast set up question

  • Thread starter Thread starter EIGHTEIGHT_GT
  • Start date Start date Aug 15, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

EIGHTEIGHT_GT

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
159
0
0
Tri-Cities,Washington
Aug 17, 2005
#21
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #21
That 308 degrees spec was at .005 lift, not the more often used .050 lift now. And even though it was a somewhat long duration, the lift at the valve was only .500 . For a really impressive sound, nothing beats three dueces , with quiet mufflers, preferably romped on in a downtown street between the buildings A 63-1/2 Galaxie 427 will be a low-riser, unless it came from a factory drag car. As for exhaust, the more cubes you have pumping thru it, the louder it gets. A muffler and pipes that are somewhat quiet for a small block will be noticeably louder behind a big block.
Click to expand...

You are right, the 308 duration is NOT @.050 lift, but is still very lopey. The entire motor has been rebuilt so I am completely assuming that is has more lift than .500. When I get the specs this weekend I will post them. I do like the high compression, tinny header and muffler sound that Flowmaster has, and it will still sound incredible with that system, but I was looking for something different. If not flowmaster it will be going on. The system will be atleast 3 inch all the way back.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Aug 17, 2005
#22
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • #22
My 90 has flowmasters and I can't imagine what they would be like in my 70. The drone would drive you absolutely insane. Flowmasters try to make big block sound out of a small block which i think is unnecessary in this case. Get some Hooker headers, 3 inch tubing and something that will not drone. Your ears will bleed!
Kevin
 
G

GNN60GT500

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2002
1,218
26
48
5 car lengths in front of you!
Aug 18, 2005
#23
  • Aug 18, 2005
  • #23
iskwezm said:
the cam really isnt that big for that size engine,if it was a small block it would sound a lot nastier,but should sound good.I would say try the Spin Techs or Borla,i dont care for the sound of Magnaflow
Click to expand...


Next show Im at, you need to come listen to my 66-

Will you be at the Queen Mary Show?

Im running Magnaflow X pipe and mufflers on my 67 GT500- big block car-

I think it is perfect- I can hear the motor and the exhaust- and there is very little drone on the highway-

Under a load at low RPM, the car does drone-

but at high RPM, and when cruising- it is absolutely perfect-

I am running worked over factory exhaust manifolds as well- no headers-
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Aug 18, 2005
#24
  • Aug 18, 2005
  • #24
GNN60GT500 said:
I am running worked over factory exhaust manifolds as well- no headers-
Click to expand...
I see you went the smart route and stuck with Manifolds on your big block. After dealing with full length Hookers on my 67 with both the 390 and 427, about the only headers I'd consider ( if I had it to do over again) for a big block Stang would be FPA shortys or Tri-Y's ( I can't recall offhand which Stan makes for them) I've got his shorty's on my 68 Merc's 390
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Aug 18, 2005
#25
  • Aug 18, 2005
  • #25
I think mufflers do make the car sound good, sometimes more than it really has. I don't think glass packs could make a 427 sound bad.
 

EIGHTEIGHT_GT

Founding Member
May 20, 2001
159
0
0
Tri-Cities,Washington
Aug 21, 2005
#26
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #26
Update on specs

Ok I wil have to apologize. There is a big correction on the 427. This 427 is out of a 66 Fairlane and was pieced together. It has a 428 crank, bored .020 over and the cam is like a comp stage 2 or something..with like .598 lift not really all that much. Stainless steel valves because of how the motor blew. Actually it really didnt blow. Apparently Ford valvestems are hollow. What happened is one stems broke off the valve into pieces and then got sucked into the cylinder beat up eveything in there including the head. My father still has the solid lifter 427 sitting on the engine stand.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Progress Thread New To Me 1988 GT - trying to set up vacuum lines for upper intake question
  • pindude80
  • May 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 9 10 11
Replies
214
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 28, 2026
pindude80
P
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
886
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
H
Drivetrain 4R70W clutch friction/metals/piston set up questions for transmission guru
  • Hizdudeness
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
975
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2024
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?