• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Blew my 01 with a supercharger in 200 miles????

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himark
  • Start date Start date May 31, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
H

Himark

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
89
0
0
May 31, 2006
#1
  • May 31, 2006
  • #1
This car is actually a pal of mines (20k miles) and he has not pulled the motor yet. But here is what happened, He had a Vortec supercharger installed by the dyno shop here in town they tuned it did all the appropriate changes and when he picked the car up they told him his boost was running right at 12 PSI and to run no less than 92 octane. One week later the car makes a loud knock and when he went to restart the car it turned over like it was way advanced time then started and knocked very rapidly. I am guessing a spun bearing. Whats your guess here of the procuring problem?
 
C

cronin49

Banned
Aug 12, 2003
432
1
16
SC
May 31, 2006
#2
  • May 31, 2006
  • #2
12 psi is a lot of boost. What are the internals? Is it a GT or Cobra?
 
H

Himark

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
89
0
0
May 31, 2006
#3
  • May 31, 2006
  • #3
Stock GT motor
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 31, 2006
#4
  • May 31, 2006
  • #4
Himark said:
Stock GT motor
Click to expand...
There's your answer. Not saying a stock motor won't run for a while sucking up 12psi (since a couple of memebers here are doing it), but you've got to have a really conservative tune and keep a nice rich A/F ratio to keep it happy. My guess is that it detonated, broke the piston ring land and took out at least one rod and piston with it. It might even be possible that he then smashed it/them into one or more open valves, which would most likely bend a valve and or break one or more of the cam feelers making a mess of the top end of the motor as well. Basically.....I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but when these things go, they go big. He's probably going to be looking at $2,000-$3,000 for a built short block.


....live and learn.
 
2

2001sleeper

New Member
Nov 22, 2004
136
0
0
May 31, 2006
#5
  • May 31, 2006
  • #5
who tuned this car?
 
H

Himark

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
89
0
0
May 31, 2006
#6
  • May 31, 2006
  • #6
"the shop" in Lincoln Nebraska. They said they had done tons of these without any problems. My pal asked him directly if 12 psi was too much and he said no it would be fine. My pal is not going after them but he deserves the right to broadcast there incompetence i would say.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
May 31, 2006
#7
  • May 31, 2006
  • #7
too much boost on a bad tune is my guess...
built shortblock is just a phone call away.
 

VPStang

Founding Member
Oct 1, 2002
346
0
16
bHAM, alabama
May 31, 2006
#8
  • May 31, 2006
  • #8
damn...let us know how it turns out--meaning what the shop does for him...
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
May 31, 2006
#9
  • May 31, 2006
  • #9
that is too much boost for a stock block, and the tune had to due with it too.....what kind of gas was he runing since a few states have that ethanol chit or something like that
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
May 31, 2006
#10
  • May 31, 2006
  • #10
Himark in thread title said:
Blew my 01 with a supercharger in 200 miles????
Click to expand...
Himark said:
This car is actually a pal of mines
Click to expand...
Is it yours or his?
Himark said:
"the shop" in Lincoln Nebraska.
Click to expand...
Should have gone to either Dynosport in Lincoln or EJ's in Omaha.
 
H

Himark

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
89
0
0
May 31, 2006
#11
  • May 31, 2006
  • #11
VPStang said:
damn...let us know how it turns out--meaning what the shop does for him...
Click to expand...


This is a whole other debate, I now both peeps positions and know the risks involved changing from stock. BUT if the tuning company is paid 1500 bux to tune a car and represents themselves as professionals in there field and make a blatent mistake, YES i do feel they should be partially or fully responsible depending on the severity of the negligence. In this case they have told him SORRY.

03ghoststang said:
that is too much boost for a stock block, and the tune had to due with it too.....what kind of gas was he runing since a few states have that ethanol chit or something like that
Click to expand...


Was just looking at his dyno sheets and HP was 338 if that gives you an idea of how hard they were boosting it.
 

SamMan

New Member
Aug 20, 2005
121
0
0
Denton, TX
May 31, 2006
#12
  • May 31, 2006
  • #12
338 seems low to kill a block.

Im putting down that and ~440 TRQ.

I wonder if he got screwed by the ethenol deal.

You should find out what the timing was set at and what the a/f was. Where are the dyno graphs?
 

VPStang

Founding Member
Oct 1, 2002
346
0
16
bHAM, alabama
May 31, 2006
#13
  • May 31, 2006
  • #13
wow...1500 bucks to tune and then this...really sucks

and I'm guessing they're sticking to their guns about 12 psi being perfectly safe on the tune they put in...

Himark said:
This is a whole other debate, I now both peeps positions and know the risks involved changing from stock. BUT if the tuning company is paid 1500 bux to tune a car and represents themselves as professionals in there field and make a blatent mistake, YES i do feel they should be partially or fully responsible depending on the severity of the negligence. In this case they have told him SORRY.




Was just looking at his dyno sheets and HP was 338 if that gives you an idea of how hard they were boosting it.
Click to expand...
 

VPStang

Founding Member
Oct 1, 2002
346
0
16
bHAM, alabama
May 31, 2006
#14
  • May 31, 2006
  • #14
werd--his tune must have been really fudged--to be running 12 psi and only 338 hp...stevie wonder must have been tuning...



SamMan said:
338 seems low to kill a block.

Im putting down that and ~440 TRQ.

I wonder if he got screwed by the ethenol deal.

You should find out what the timing was set at and what the a/f was. Where are the dyno graphs?
Click to expand...
 

Dope 97GT

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
439
0
0
Rochester, NY (SUNY Brockport)
May 31, 2006
#15
  • May 31, 2006
  • #15
12 psi and only 330hp seems a little odd and i still dont know what year if its a 96-98 that might explain a bit more for the low numbers and the thing blowin up.

Overall it just sounds like a bad tune unless he was beatin on it bad
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
May 31, 2006
#16
  • May 31, 2006
  • #16
Dope 97GT said:
i still dont know what year if its a 96-98 that might explain a bit more for the low numbers and the thing blowin up.
Click to expand...
Thread title = 2001
 

Z28 KILR

Founding Member
Aug 4, 2001
386
0
0
Columbus, OH
May 31, 2006
#17
  • May 31, 2006
  • #17
That HP number seems really low to me. I had a V1 Vortech setup on my 99 GT that ran 360-370 HP with just some exhaust mods and a 90mm MAF. At 12 psi I was at 404 HP but like your friend my engine did not last very long.
 
H

Himark

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
89
0
0
Jun 1, 2006
#18
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #18
SamMan said:
338 seems low to kill a block.

Im putting down that and ~440 TRQ.

I wonder if he got screwed by the ethenol deal.

You should find out what the timing was set at and what the a/f was. Where are the dyno graphs?
Click to expand...


Got his dyno sheets today. The AFR was 11.9, 330.8 HP 337.2 TQ.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Jun 1, 2006
#19
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #19
Himark said:
Got his dyno sheets today. The AFR was 11.9, 330.8 HP 337.2 TQ.
Click to expand...

If those numbers are correct, I wouldn't be so quick to blame the tuner. Something was already wrong with the car.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
Jun 1, 2006
#20
  • Jun 1, 2006
  • #20
Himark said:
Got his dyno sheets today. The AFR was 11.9, 330.8 HP 337.2 TQ.
Click to expand...

He could have over reved it?
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
B
2001 roush stage 3 - sat for 5 years
  • Brando_05
  • Aug 26, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
262
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 26, 2025
Brando_05
B
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?