• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Blower or Internals First?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 04YELLOWGT
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

imblown-ru

New Member
Dec 6, 2005
247
0
0
Roanoke VA
Jan 15, 2006
#21
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #21
deal
 
S

Stangdriver1119

New Member
Aug 24, 2005
231
0
0
Saddle Brook, NJ
Jan 15, 2006
#22
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #22
Yeah if you went with the 1.7L u don't need forged internals as long as you stay around 400rwhp. Getting the 2.2L, yah you definitely need forged internals.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 15, 2006
#23
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #23
Stick with your stock engine and your original plan for the Procharger. Ask the tuner to be a little on the conservative side for the time being, then build the motor when you're ready. There’s no need to go with the forged crank unless you plan on making over 600-650rwhp and a lot of RPM and even then some have lived past that. Besides….realistically, if you’re worried about cash enough right now to even put this thing together at such a basic level, you’re no where near ready enough to drop the kind of coin down in order to build a system that’s going to test the might of a stock crank shaft. Having a 600rwhp car goes a lot further than just a set of rods, pistons and bolting on a big blower. You’ll end up $30,000 into this thing before you even hit that mark. Stay realistic with your goals and you’ll enjoy the project that much more. Save the pipe dreams for when you win the lottery. Jim Fitzgerald can attest to how much money 600+hp will cost. Are you sure you’re really ready to go there?

That being said, the P-1SC will make every bit the power that the 1.7KB will and still cost you a fair bit less in the end. It makes me laugh when people suggest that Kenne Bells are "safer" for your engine than any other. They'll scrap a stock bottom end just as quickly and easily as any other supercharger on the market, if pushed too hard. It's the person doing the tuning that determines how well your engine is going to hold up to the boost levels you're running, not the blower itself.
 
S

Stangdriver1119

New Member
Aug 24, 2005
231
0
0
Saddle Brook, NJ
Jan 15, 2006
#24
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #24
Gearbanger 101 said:
Stick with your stock engine and your original plan for the Procharger. Ask the tuner to be a little on the conservative side for the time being, then build the motor when you're ready. There’s no need to go with the forged crank unless you plan on making over 600-650rwhp and a lot of RPM and even then some have lived past that. Besides….realistically, if you’re worried about cash enough right now to even put this thing together at such a basic level, you’re no where near ready enough to drop the kind of coin down in order to build a system that’s going to test the might of a stock crank shaft. Having a 600rwhp car goes a lot further than just a set of rods, pistons and bolting on a big blower. You’ll end up $30,000 into this thing before you even hit that mark. Stay realistic with your goals and you’ll enjoy the project that much more. Save the pipe dreams for when you win the lottery. Jim Fitzgerald can attest to how much money 600+hp will cost. Are you sure you’re really ready to go there?

That being said, the P-1SC will make every bit the power that the 1.7KB will and still cost you a fair bit less in the end. It makes me laugh when people suggest that Kenne Bells are "safer" for your engine than any other. They'll scrap a stock bottom end just as quickly and easily as any other supercharger on the market, if pushed too hard. It's the person doing the tuning that determines how well your engine is going to hold up to the boost levels you're running, not the blower itself.
Click to expand...

I 100% agree with the tuning thing. Bad tune on any s/c will end you engine real quick. But choice of supercharger depends on where the person wants most of there power.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 15, 2006
#25
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #25
What ever I decide to do I will prolly go to Pauls High Performance to work on my car. I want to have 400-500 rwhp. Thats what Im looking for right now. I figured I could have every thing bought and installed in 2 years or less. But you guys say I should just get the blower now with a safe tune and do the internal work when I can afford it.

One thing I was thinking couldnt I use a healthy shot of Nitrous while Im waiting on the blower? So I could still get some use out of having a built engine then.
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Jan 15, 2006
#26
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #26
04YELLOWGT said:
One thing I was thinking couldnt I use a healthy shot of Nitrous while Im waiting on the blower? So I could still get some use out of having a built engine then.
Click to expand...


sounds like a good plan.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 15, 2006
#27
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #27
04YELLOWGT said:
One thing I was thinking couldnt I use a healthy shot of Nitrous while Im waiting on the blower? So I could still get some use out of having a built engine then.
Click to expand...
You could I guess, but I'd just be patient if I were you. Now you’re talking about a whole different kind of power adder. For what it’s going to cost you for the kit, not to mention the numerous bottle fills in the mean time, you could have ended up part of the way to your forged motor build. Unless you're going to go with a dry kit (which is a little costly) you're always running the risk of a nitrous backfire which will more than likely destroy your stock manifold anyway. Never mind the fact that you don’t really need a built motor to run a reasonable shot of nitrous to begin with.

Then, after all of that, you're going to end up having to rip all of that stuff off later on to install the blower.....and then have to worry about trying to sell it to recoup part of the cost afterwards.
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#28
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #28
jimfitzgerald said:
You will be miserable driving around with forged internals for two years waiting to buy a blower. What is your end objective? If you just want a hot street car, I would buy a Kenne Bell 1.7 and a few suspension mods and be done with it. You can safely run up to 400 rwhp with your stock engine and a good tune. Anything more than 400 rwhp on the street is pretty much a waste.

If you want more than that, you are going to need a forged shortblock. Rather that mess around with rebuilding your's, I would buy a forged shortblock from Modular Powerhouse and sell you stock shortblock. However, before you spend your money on that, get a KB 2.2 and pulley down to 400 rwhp and enjoy your car while you save for the shortblock. After you get the forged shortblock, turn up the wick to 500 or 600 rwhp.
Click to expand...
Trust me, do this. You won't be sorry. If you install a shortblock built for a blower, it will have dished pistons and reduced compression. It will be a dog normally aspirated. If you throw on a nitrous kit, it's just going to take that much longer to save up for a blower.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 15, 2006
#29
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #29
Like the MPH Street/strip engine?
 
W

WillDuhhBeast

New Member
Jun 25, 2005
339
0
0
Jacksonville Florida
Jan 15, 2006
#30
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #30
Again, not to hijack a thread.. but this goes along the lines of where I was thinking about going with the MPH mongoose turbo kit installed and tuned.

Can it be powered down enough on the tune intiially to run on the stock block while saving for the forged setup?
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#31
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #31
04YELLOWGT said:
Like the MPH Street/strip engine?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what you are asking, but that's the engine I would recommend. If you have a blower, they will put dished pistons in it and optimize it for a blower application. If you plan to run n/a or nitrous, they will build it for that with higher compression.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 15, 2006
#32
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #32
jimfitzgerald said:
I'm not sure what you are asking, but that's the engine I would recommend. If you have a blower, they will put dished pistons in it and optimize it for a blower application. If you plan to run n/a or nitrous, they will build it for that with higher compression.
Click to expand...

Yea I was asking if thats the engine I should get.
If I did this would they just ship it to me or the place Im having the work done at? I would go down there and have them do all the work but thats a little further than I want to drive. Also all the stuff on the engine I have now would just be put on the new engine right?
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 15, 2006
#33
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #33
Jim I was wondering too, what would be the difference between buying that MPH engine and just replacing the internals in my engine? Arent they the same blocks?
 
J

jimfitzgerald

New Member
Apr 11, 2001
6,672
0
0
Jan 15, 2006
#34
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #34
04YELLOWGT said:
Jim I was wondering too, what would be the difference between buying that MPH engine and just replacing the internals in my engine? Arent they the same blocks?
Click to expand...
A short block includes the block, crank shaft, rods, pistons, and associated bearings, etc. If you were to buy the MPH street/strip short block, this is what you would get. And it would come assembled and with a one year warranty, I believe. If you were to replace the internals in your engine's shortblock, the block itself would be the only thing that would not be replaced. The block is cheap (like $300, I believe). All of your stock pistons, rods, bearings, etc would probably be of no value to anyone. Personally, I would prefer to buy a shortblock assembled by MPH with a one year warranty than to have a local shop do that. You could also sell your stock shortblock or keep it as a spare. Also, if you want to lose 70 pounds off the front end of your car, you could order your shortblock with an aluminum block for a slightly higher price.
 

04YELLOWGT

Active Member
Jun 29, 2005
1,135
2
39
Indiana
Jan 16, 2006
#35
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #35
Thanks Jim. It looks like when I go to get the block thats what ill be doing.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
142
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
Engine Explorer - Lower intake internal cleaning
  • R82148V
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 6, 2025
rednotch
T
2002 V6 3.8L Help Me
  • TheIncompetentMechanic
  • Apr 4, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
684
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 12, 2026
TheIncompetentMechanic
T
D
Progress Thread Today in the shed........
  • Don7Up
  • May 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
698
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 6, 2026
Don7Up
D
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
723
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?