• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

car wont make the power or run the number, whats wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Foxfan88
  • Start date Start date Mar 10, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 10, 2007
#1
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #1
ok some of u may have read my topic on my dyno runs.

my mods are
rebuilt 302 shortblock
thumper ported e7s
tmoss ported stock lower intake.
gasket matched upper (port matched and opened to 70mm TB)
B-cam advanced 4 degrees
1.7 RRs
70mm TB
73 MM MAF (stock injectors)
CAI
holley 190lph with adj regulator.
UD pullies
BBK headers
OR Hpipe
dynomax race bullet mufflers
KC clutch
freshly rebuilt t5 with 2.95 D&D gearset with steeda triax
aluminum DS
3.90 gears

car made 225HP and 265-270 lb FT on a mustang dyno

got to the track today and it ran best of 14.2@98.99 with a 2.1 60' on street tires.

i didnt come to conclusions on the HP numbers till i got to the track to see what it would do. people said the mustang dynos read lower than dynojets and etc.

i came out dissapointed in its performance today. the car runs good. no problems with it running it runs smooth and drives great. AFR on the dyno was a steady 13:1

i did a compression test last week to start eliminating possibilities. the test was perfect, all 8 cyls were in between 140-145

for the engine HCI i figured it would have made more HP and trapped at least 104-105 running mid to low 13s everyone online seems to have great luck with tmoss/thumper combos.

take mind my stock engine actually ran the same if not better than my new engine.

best runs on the stock engine were 14.1 @99 with a 2.0 60' on DRs
and
13.9 @97 with a 1.9 60' on DRs

mods then included
BONE STOCK LONGBLOCK never had heads off and had over 140k miles
1.7 RRs
CAI
UD pullies
E-fan
flowtech headers, crappy hpipe and flow40s
KC clutch
stock 3.35 t5
3.90s gears

as you can see, i added quite a bit of new parts to the new engine and gained nothing, actually seemed like it lost power at the track.

but the engine runs good, no mechanical problems. just doesnt make the power it seems

like i stated before, AFR was dead on, compression couldnt be better
one thing i considered was going back in and putting the B-cam back to straight up instead of deg adv. the new engine stops pulling shortly after 5k, a stock engine pulls to the same point. i think it may help but wouldnt have thought i would have had such a drastic effect on numbers and times.

just confuses me, i have seen people with very similar combos running mid to high 12s.

maybe i should just park it, take off the HCI i have now, sell it and dont cut corners and go straight for the trickflow HCI kit and be done with it.

on the dyno deal. my friend has a 97 GT, its mods are short, it has a k&n filter. and a hpipe and flowmasters an on the exact same dyno it made 207 HP and 270 TQ, made the same TQ as me and not much less HP. i figured everything i have done to my car would have it make more than 17 HP over a pretty much stock SOHC 4.6L, so its almost certain something is wrong with my car.

some could argue that its still just stock parts, but i added a handful of mods and i figured i would have gained some power there and better times, i figured a nice tmoss/thumper/B-cam HCI would be more than a 25 hp increase over stock assuming a stock 5.0 makes 200 HP on the dyno

so i come to my question do you guys have any idea on what may be wrong and what to maybe try doing.
 
R

red95gtconvert

New Member
May 29, 2006
382
0
0
Ponca city, OK
Mar 10, 2007
#2
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #2
Maybe it just needs a good tune
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Mar 10, 2007
#3
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #3
i'd suggest throwing the cam back straight.. no degreeing of any sort.. an electric fan, a completely ported intake (imo) would do better up top, and do you have a set of high lift valve springs? .. also what do you run the timing at as it sits?
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 10, 2007
#4
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #4
the springs are the one thumper installs, if they are his base heads then i dont think they are much more than stock springs

and the timing is at about 15-18 degress advanced
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Mar 10, 2007
#5
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #5
what kinda plugs are you running.. what wires etc.. running any msd? dont have the dyno charts on hand do you? if you do, check out where its making power and it stops.. post them up if you can
 

jtfairlane

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
468
3
0
Mar 10, 2007
#6
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #6
I'd also recommend on that combo to have installed the cam straight up, as was already mentioned.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 10, 2007
#7
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #7
motorcraft plugs, FRPP wireset, the power on the dyno was a smooth curve. no real point where it started pulling, it was a smooth gain up until about 5200 and then it started falling down.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Mar 10, 2007
#8
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #8
yea, change the cams degreeing back to standard..
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Mar 10, 2007
#9
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #9
what are you shifting at? Its not exactly a powerhosue combo, but it should do around 102 at least. My friends stock geared/exhaust only 90GT went like 100mph.

Also, how did you advance the cam 4*? If you just put it in and used the timing chain to advance it 4*, thats incredibly incorrect. You can't degree a cam or change its degree if you don't know where it is to begin with.
 
T

TENGRAM

New Member
Mar 18, 2006
143
0
0
Mar 11, 2007
#10
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #10
that t5 with 2.95 isn't doing you any favors at the track. also might want to think about a different cam. degreeing the cam is a must. have you Checked for Codes?
 

gcwh02

New Member
Jun 20, 2005
515
0
0
pottstown, PA
Mar 11, 2007
#11
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #11
he had the 2.95 t5 in with his other motor so thats not the prob.
 
T

TENGRAM

New Member
Mar 18, 2006
143
0
0
Mar 11, 2007
#12
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #12
gcwh02 said:
he had the 2.95 t5 in with his other motor so thats not the prob.
Click to expand...

Foxfan88 said:
best runs on the stock engine were 14.1 @99 with a 2.0 60' on DRs
and
13.9 @97 with a 1.9 60' on DRs

mods then included
BONE STOCK LONGBLOCK never had heads off and had over 140k miles
1.7 RRs
CAI
UD pullies
E-fan
flowtech headers, crappy hpipe and flow40s
KC clutch
stock 3.35 t5
3.90s gears
Click to expand...
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Mar 11, 2007
#13
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #13
gcwh02 said:
he had the 2.95 t5 in with his other motor so thats not the prob.
Click to expand...

he said he had a stock 3.35 gear set on the old motor.. and unless you have adjustable timing change/gears.. your problem could very well be it isnt correct i agree though, should make a good bit more power
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Mar 11, 2007
#14
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #14
put the cam in straight up , set timing to 13-14 max , and electric fan would probably wake it up some too
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 11, 2007
#15
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #15
the trans isnt the problem. to counter the higher 1st gear i just have to launch at a higher rpm(which isnt bad, bc i would be at a better rpm making more power upon launch) i forgot to add, but the 13.9 run on the stock engine was with the 2.95 trans.( the 14.1 was with the old 3.35 t5) my driving isnt a problem it just wont get the mph, yesterday i ran it, i managed a 2.1 60' on street tires and not any spin, had to feather it some for the first 200' or so, but i didnt spin, and i gave it all it had, it wasnt going to get any better, the car was running asa good as it was going to get. i probably would have been running 13.6-13.8 with a good tire, but still wouldnt have had the mph i wanted. i know the heads and stuff are capable of more.


on the cam timing, i didnt actually "degree" it i just bought the frpp adjustable timing set and set the crank sprocket to 4Degrees adv. like thumper told me. i feel that may contributing heavily to my problem, i feel it needs more topend.


i still may just go ahead and strip it down and get the TFS kit, i will most likely want more power anyways later on. i dont have much money at all in my currentHCI

my shortblock is rebuilt and the compression test was great so its up to it for sure.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Mar 11, 2007
#16
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #16
i'd run that route as well.. you have all the other stuff you need already dont you?
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Mar 11, 2007
#17
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #17
What are the chances someone sold you some cleaned up E7s and told you they were thumpers?
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 11, 2007
#18
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #18
thumper heads have a special tag punched into the top where the valve cover sits. i emailed thumper pics of the heads and he confirmed they were his.

i had a machinist tear em down and check them out since i got them used. and he said they had very good port work done to them.

i am almost certain they are thumpers, btu who knows, its definatly possible that they arent.


talked to the machinist guy i know. hes real knowledgeable and i showed him my dyno sheets. he said its starts building torque good and then peaks too early and said my intake manifold can keep up with the rest of the engine. which seems to make sense he said a better flowing intake would help me out alot. i still duno if i want to go ahead and get one or step up to the trickflow stuff. i already have supporing mods. i have a bigger TB, MAF and a bigger fuel pump all i will need is a slightly bigger injector.... i just feel even if i get it running right, i would still want more power.

people get 300RWHP all day with the TFS kit, thats pretty damn good. and like i said, now would be the best time seeing as i already have all the bolt ons and and ready to go

what should i do stick with the budget stuff or step up to the big stuff.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Mar 11, 2007
#19
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #19
if you have the money, go for it..
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 11, 2007
#20
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #20
well i dont have it right this second, i will get it this summer working more hours. plus i can sell my current HCI to help pay for it.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
263
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
677
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Engine Information that is Needed When You Post a "Car is not Running" or "Car is Running Poorly" Thread
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 4, 2025
Bullitt347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
942
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?