• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Choosing an Intake???

  • Thread starter Thread starter LxVert
  • Start date Start date Aug 11, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 11, 2008
#1
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #1
Hey everyone,

In the process of building a motor and I'm looking for recomendations on what intake to buy. The car is used for street/strip

Here is what I have:
302 bored .040 9.5:1 Compression
E7 Heads flow bench ported with Gt40 Valve package
Ford E303 Cam
1.6 rockers

5spd with 4:10's
Thinking of switching to 3:73's with the car now being stick
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 11, 2008
#2
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #2
exploder intake
 
M

mavmavv

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
185
0
0
Aug 11, 2008
#3
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #3
stykthyn said:
exploder intake
Click to expand...

+1 on Explorer
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 11, 2008
#4
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #4
Dude, the Explorer is sweet & cheap, and you could always do a little port work down the road to make it run even harder. If you aren't a fan of the looks, the Cobra and GT-40 are basically the same thing, but more expensive. Don't buy a Chinese Cobra intake (the castings that FRPP currently sell are Chinese)!
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 11, 2008
#5
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #5
Did this just turn into a shopping thread? Get ready to be moved, fellas!

To keep this thread as tech as possible, the Eddy is a good intake, but maybe a little too large for a 302 with just ported E7s on it. The 351 intake might also be too much flow for your setup. Both would make good high end numbers, but low end torque will suffer.
 
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 11, 2008
#6
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #6
Low end torque is something that I would like to keep in the picture.
Would a trick flow street burner intake still be to much flow?
 

dcurtis

10 Year Member
Jan 19, 2006
688
7
39
Aug 11, 2008
#7
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #7
Performer, TrickFlow Street, Or the Gt40
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Aug 11, 2008
#8
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #8
tmoss ported gt40/explorer/cobra for optimizing under 5500 rpm.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Aug 11, 2008
#9
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #9
LxVert said:
Low end torque is something that I would like to keep in the picture.
Would a trick flow street burner intake still be to much flow?
Click to expand...

Actually, I've heard good things about those. They look really good, too. Even though they are more expensive than used Explorers or Cobras, they still are a decent price compared to other new aftermarket units. I can't say, however, that I've ever seen a direct dyno comparison of one of those and a Cobra/Explorer/GT40.
 

purplestang90

New Member
Aug 4, 2008
44
0
0
Buchanan County, Virginia
Aug 11, 2008
#10
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #10
I really like my SYSTEMAX its a great intake and its good for NOS if you ever want to go that rout and diffanatly go with the 3:73 ,4:10 is a little over kill and not trying to be a smarta$$ but you should really go a F303 Iv had the E and the B and the F is by far the best cam and the best soundin cam!!!
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Aug 11, 2008
#11
  • Aug 11, 2008
  • #11
NikwoaC said:
Actually, I've heard good things about those. They look really good, too. Even though they are more expensive than used Explorers or Cobras, they still are a decent price compared to other new aftermarket units. I can't say, however, that I've ever seen a direct dyno comparison of one of those and a Cobra/Explorer/GT40.
Click to expand...
Tmoss's site has one
 
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 12, 2008
#12
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #12
purplestang90 said:
I really like my SYSTEMAX its a great intake and its good for NOS if you ever want to go that rout and diffanatly go with the 3:73 ,4:10 is a little over kill and not trying to be a smarta$$ but you should really go a F303 Iv had the E and the B and the F is by far the best cam and the best soundin cam!!!
Click to expand...

Wouldn't the F cam be a little over kill on my set up? I have had other people say that they thought the E might even be a little much for my car.
 

purplestang90

New Member
Aug 4, 2008
44
0
0
Buchanan County, Virginia
Aug 12, 2008
#13
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #13
I dont think it would be long as ur runnin those 1.6 rockers because your valves arent that big.
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Aug 12, 2008
#14
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #14
Don't get an F cam.

An E cam would be better but letter cams are really outdated, you can get a better off the shelf cam from someone like crane, comp cams, etc. Call one of them up and run what they recommend, if you really want a new cam.

For the intake, I agree to use an explorer. It would be a great match for your setup, and let you put more dollars to a cam with less dollars from your pocket since you seem interested in changing that too.
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Aug 12, 2008
#15
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #15
get a typhoon this is coming from a person with a t-moss, 2 explorer's, and an edelbrock..

lots of room to grow and only $300..
 

2BADSTANGS

Member
Jun 19, 2008
385
1
18
Colorado
Aug 12, 2008
#16
  • Aug 12, 2008
  • #16
My .02... Cobra
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 13, 2008
#17
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #17
what did the heads flow?
 
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 13, 2008
#18
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #18
I don't remeber the exact numbers, but it was something like 220? intake and 150? exhaust, if that sounds logical.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Aug 13, 2008
#19
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #19
Stock or ported, an Explorer/Cobra/GT40 would be a very nice choice then for good average power and not give up much if any up top. Typhoon would be OK too, Holley SMII is too much for a wide power band but would pick up peak - same for a RPMII.
 
L

LxVert

Member
Dec 26, 2003
80
0
6
Aug 13, 2008
#20
  • Aug 13, 2008
  • #20
Would the RPMII rob a lot of low end torque?
There is one for reasonably cheap in the classifieds of the local auto mag. so I thought about picking it up unless it would do more harm then good to the power.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
763
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
961
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?