dyno results....aahhh

fluffyrunnells

New Member

Feb 4, 2006

0

0

0

new hampshire

Feb 7, 2006

#1

• Feb 7, 2006

• #1

got back from dyno.....not sure if bad or not..????


230 hp
290 tq

magnapack, pulleys, and K&N only mods

2004 gt, 14000 miles.....

when it got tuned it ran 245hp and 298 tq...with tuner...

good, bad or ugly..????

 

stangGT97

New Member

Dec 22, 2004

1,299

1

0

Boston area, MA

Feb 7, 2006

#2

• Feb 7, 2006

• #2

that actually sounds like pretty good numbers considering the minimal mods you have

 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit

Mar 30, 2005

1,461

1

39

Baltimore, MD

Feb 7, 2006

#3

• Feb 7, 2006

• #3

auto or manual? Im guessing Manual.

thats not too bad. im guessing its about average. Considering we have 300ft/lbs at the crank, putting down 290 is pretty good. what type of dyno was it?

picking up 15hp with the tune sounds good too

 

BennyBlown2v

New Member

Dec 9, 2004

1,233

1

0

Carmel, INdiana

Feb 7, 2006

#4

• Feb 7, 2006

• #4

Sounds about right!

 

fluffyrunnells

New Member

Feb 4, 2006

0

0

0

new hampshire

Feb 7, 2006

#5

• Feb 7, 2006

• #5

stick, and dyno type not sure......nh performance-dyno.com

 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit

Mar 30, 2005

1,461

1

39

Baltimore, MD

Feb 7, 2006

#6

• Feb 7, 2006

• #6

did you notice any banners or print on the dyno? should have said something like "Mustang Dyno" or "Dynojet". Its no biggie, im just curious.

 

fluffyrunnells

New Member

Feb 4, 2006

0

0

0

new hampshire

Feb 7, 2006

#7

• Feb 7, 2006

• #7

dynojet

 

S

Stangdriver1119

New Member

Aug 24, 2005

231

0

0

Saddle Brook, NJ

Feb 7, 2006

#8

• Feb 7, 2006

• #8

I wonder what my numbers are like on a dynojet...Ive always run mine on a mustang dyno and I'm always like eh with my numbers

 

fluffyrunnells

New Member

Feb 4, 2006

0

0

0

new hampshire

Feb 7, 2006

#9

• Feb 7, 2006

• #9

is there a difference between the two..?

 

fluffyrunnells

New Member

Feb 4, 2006

0

0

0

new hampshire

Feb 7, 2006

#10

• Feb 7, 2006

• #10

Stangdriver1119 said:

I wonder what my numbers are like on a dynojet...Ive always run mine on a mustang dyno and I'm always like eh with my numbers

Click to expand...

awesome....did you notice a difference with the x-pipe..??? not so much power but sound....very interested in them but cant decide....

 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is

May 1, 2005

3,015

1

79

7200 feet

Feb 7, 2006

#11

• Feb 7, 2006

• #11

dynojet #s are bigger than a mustang dyno

 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit

Mar 30, 2005

1,461

1

39

Baltimore, MD

Feb 7, 2006

#12

• Feb 7, 2006

• #12

fluffyrunnells said:

is there a difference between the two..?

Click to expand...

yes, one usually reads lower/higher (depending on which "one"). Im not sure how it goes.

 

hotmustang331

Active Member

Apr 29, 2004

2,967

3

48

Bastrop,TX

Feb 7, 2006

#13

• Feb 7, 2006

• #13

Thats VERY good. Only 3 RWHP behind mine when i was bolton, and I had O/R X,magnaflow CB, electric WP ,K&N, SCT-4 bank, and a trick flow plenum. But my A/F was jacked @ 14-15. Again, good #s .

 

ADRENLN

Active Member

Apr 16, 2003

2,342

3

49

NJ

Feb 7, 2006

#14

• Feb 7, 2006

• #14

yea id have to agree, those numbers are high. put down the same as i did when i had a x pipe, catback, cai, plenum, t/b. SOMEHOW you have pullies and are making the same power.

my numbers and mods were similar to hotmustang.

 

streetstang03

unModerator

Dec 27, 2003

0

1

0

the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,

Feb 7, 2006

#15

• Feb 7, 2006

• #15

damn, nice tq

 

QU!CK

New Member

Apr 27, 2004

146

0

0

Charlotte, NC

Feb 7, 2006

#16

• Feb 7, 2006

• #16

helty said:

yes, one usually reads lower/higher (depending on which "one"). Im not sure how it goes.

Click to expand...

Mustang dynos typically read lower but it's because they are load bearing dynos IIRC. They also tend to give you a more "real world" representation of your hp/tq #'s.


-J

 

Mike97gt

it doe snot

Founding Member

Jan 26, 1999

10,633

7

89

the people's republic of massachusetts

Feb 8, 2006

#17

• Feb 8, 2006

• #17

good numbers. great numbers after the tune.

 

csledd

Official Ovary Punching Member

Founding Member

Aug 18, 2001

1,115

1

0

Paducah, KY

Feb 8, 2006

#18

• Feb 8, 2006

• #18

that tune definately helped you out, good numbers for your bolt ons

 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member

Jun 22, 2000

1,715

0

36

L.I., NY

Feb 8, 2006

#19

• Feb 8, 2006

• #19

Is that tuned for 91 octane gas?

 

T

trickyshadow

New Member

May 17, 2005

22

0

0

Feb 8, 2006

#20

• Feb 8, 2006

• #20

Those are not bad numbers, my 01 Gt runs 244hp/285tq with only a Diablo chip, flowmasters and a 4.10 gear. Still have the stock air box with silencer in it, waiting for my cold air kit to show up.