• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Exhaust set up

  • Thread starter Thread starter dropteeth
  • Start date Start date Sep 20, 2025
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 20, 2025
#1
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • #1
Hi Guys, I am finishing up a 347 build and adding 1"3/4 BBK longtubes... what are you guys running for a 3'' exhaust with this set up? im open to other options and opinions too..TIA
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,931
21,106
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 20, 2025
#2
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • #2
Dr. Gas Catted - X

Bassanni Quiet Thunder (no longer available)

All 2 1/2"
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,796
3,928
183
Claremore, OK
Sep 21, 2025
#3
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • #3
You can still find 3” stuff.

LAR Performance Mustang X Pipe 86-93

LAR Performance x-pipes are crafted with precision using an automated mandrel bending machine and meticulously assembled by skilled hands. Each x-pipe is immaculately crafted to complement your powerful Mustang. Direct bolt-on installation with no cutting or welding required. All O2 sensor bungs...
larperformance.com

As for the tail pipes need to know LX or GT. Pypes Performance Exhaust has 3” cat backs.
 
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 21, 2025
#4
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • #4
AeroCoupe said:
You can still find 3” stuff.

LAR Performance Mustang X Pipe 86-93

LAR Performance x-pipes are crafted with precision using an automated mandrel bending machine and meticulously assembled by skilled hands. Each x-pipe is immaculately crafted to complement your powerful Mustang. Direct bolt-on installation with no cutting or welding required. All O2 sensor bungs...
larperformance.com

As for the tail pipes need to know LX or GT. Pypes Performance Exhaust has 3” cat backs.
Click to expand...
thanks for this- would you go this route? my car is a 1993 GT and installing a terminator ecu? my old set up is mac longtubes, mac mid and flowmaster
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Sep 22, 2025
#5
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #5
Is there a reason you want or need 3in?
2.5 is big enough for the vast majority of setups.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,796
3,928
183
Claremore, OK
Sep 22, 2025
#6
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #6
I have an injected 331 making in the 460fwhp range (engine dyno’d with a carb before it was installed) and I am running a full 2.5” exhaust with shorties through a 5 speed and an 8.8. Made around 370 rwhp on a Mustang dyno. Would it make more with full length headers and a 3” system? In short absolutely.

So with that if I already had a 2.5” system would I move up to a 3”? Probably not unless I was racing.

My T-Bird has a custom made 3.5” / 3” system with a 351W that is 0.03” over.

I personally think that when you hit the 350ish cubic inch mark a 3” or larger system makes sense $$$ wise if you are wanting it to perform. And especially if it’s a striker. They will run on a 2.5” and smaller system all day long as the old big block cars of the 60’s, 70’s, and early 80’s proved albeit horribly.
 
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 22, 2025
#7
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #7
2000xp8 said:
Is there a reason you want or need 3in?
2.5 is big enough for the vast majority of setups.
Click to expand...
I figured i had 1 3/4 bbk long tubes - and needed to complete the set up or should i just stay with my Mac longs 1 5/8 set up ? not sure if the bbk will fit the mac midpipe. I guess im looking for opinions with my 347 set up.
 
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 22, 2025
#8
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #8
AeroCoupe said:
I have an injected 331 making in the 460fwhp range (engine dyno’d with a carb before it was installed) and I am running a full 2.5” exhaust with shorties through a 5 speed and an 8.8. Made around 370 rwhp on a Mustang dyno. Would it make more with full length headers and a 3” system? In short absolutely.

So with that if I already had a 2.5” system would I move up to a 3”? Probably not unless I was racing.

My T-Bird has a custom made 3.5” / 3” system with a 351W that is 0.03” over.

I personally think that when you hit the 350ish cubic inch mark a 3” or larger system makes sense $$$ wise if you are wanting it to perform. And especially if it’s a striker. They will run on a 2.5” and smaller system all day long as the old big block cars of the 60’s, 70’s, and early 80’s proved albeit horribly.
Click to expand...
thanks for this... i have a complete set up with my mac long tubes 1 5/8 with mid pipe. and cat back... but purchased some bbk longtumes 1 3/4 and was pondering what i should do.
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,796
3,928
183
Claremore, OK
Sep 22, 2025
#9
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #9
Can you detail your 347 build? Stock or CAI, throttle body, intakes, heads, cam, compression ratio, and what will your shift point be?

I limit myself to about 6200 on shifts but can spin it pretty tight with the hydraulic lifters and stock block (6600 to 6800) but on the dyno it all starts falling off around 6400. If I do anything else it will be a solid roller cam and aftermarket block so I can move the shift point up. Stock blocks don’t particularly like high rpm shifts while north of 500 fwhp. Will I ever do it? Probably not unless Blue Print starts selling the four bolt main block and it’s half of a Dart block. Anyhow, all of that and I’ll still keep the 2.5” exhaust.
 
Last edited: Sep 22, 2025
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 22, 2025
#10
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #10
AeroCoupe said:
Can you detail your 347 build? Stock or CAI, throttle body, intakes, heads, cam, compression ratio, and what will your shift point be?

I limit myself to about 6200 on shifts but can spin it pretty tight with the hydraulic lifters and stock block (6600 to 6800) but on the dyno it all starts falling off around 6400. If I do anything else it will be a solid roller cam and aftermarket block so I can move the shift point up. Stock blocks don’t particularly like high rpm shifts while north of 500 fwhp. Will I ever do it? Probably not unless Blue Print starts selling the four bolt main block and it’s half of a Dart block. Anyhow, all of that and I’ll still keep the 2.5” exhaust.
Click to expand...
I bought this engine with the info you see in the below pictures. I purchased Holley Systemac intake and terminator ecu with 24 lbs injectors 65mm throttle body with anderson power pipe... my current set up has the mac long tubes 1 5/8 that i can reuse or figure out a new set up with my BBK 1 3/4 ....
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250330_205842_Facebook.webp
    62.3 KB · Views: 40
  • Screenshot_20250330_205838_Facebook.webp
    84.2 KB · Views: 37
  • Screenshot_20250330_205832_Facebook.webp
    71.2 KB · Views: 36
  • Screenshot_20250330_205828_Facebook.webp
    184.8 KB · Views: 41
  • Screenshot_20250330_205825_Facebook.webp
    85.2 KB · Views: 44
  • Screenshot_20250330_205822_Facebook.webp
    65.5 KB · Views: 33
  • Screenshot_20250330_205819_Facebook.webp
    50.9 KB · Views: 39
  • Screenshot_20250330_205816_Facebook.webp
    200.9 KB · Views: 40
  • Screenshot_20250330_205813_Facebook.webp
    247.3 KB · Views: 37
  • Screenshot_20250330_211129_Facebook.webp
    101.3 KB · Views: 39

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,931
21,106
234
Box behind Walmart
Sep 22, 2025
#11
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #11
In general -

350-450 HP is the tipping point where you should start thinking about 3" exhaust then stepping down as it exits. This is the point where 2.5" [begins] being a restriction (meaning backpressure starts to rise) but scavenging is about perfect. 3 inch all the way to the tips at this point, would have an overall negative effect on an N/A car (unless you're turning 6000+ RPM).

At 450+ HP I would start at 3 inch from the collector through the H/X pipe and then back down to 2.5" for the cat-back.

This will give the best exhaust scavenging for a street/strip car.

If you're planning for boost in the mix, then exhaust scavenging isn't as big of a deal.

Don't forget that the exhaust charge becomes more dense and takes up less space as it cools.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Sep 22, 2025
#12
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #12
Looks like a pretty solid build, though the 15k estimate is probably off.
You can goto fordstrokers and build a 347 with a Dart block and come up a couple grand under.

Not sure what you plan to do with the car, mostly street? Mostly drag racing? Road course?
Be realistic, i used to think street track, except i never went to the track, lol.

I don't see many Pros in the 3 inch.
Probably be crazy loud without cats.
Probably be crazy expensive with the cats.
Could have rattling issues going over the axle. You certainly aren't using road race style parts and an off the shelf catback.
Gains at this HP level will probably be minimal since you already have 1 5/8 headers (lmr states 20hp over STOCK headers)
Let's say they do gain 10hp over what you have now which is likely 400-425rwhp, is 10 more hp really going make it much better?
BTW, a quick search (could be wrong, not foxbody specific), suggests the collector on BBK 1 3/4 long tubes is 2.5 anyway.

I'd run what you have now and if you want to mix and match exhaust parts later, go ahead.

What i wouldn't do is run 24's or a 65mm Throttle body, your setup most likely exceeds both.
 
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 22, 2025
#13
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • #13
2000xp8 said:
Looks like a pretty solid build, though the 15k estimate is probably off.
You can goto fordstrokers and build a 347 with a Dart block and come up a couple grand under.

Not sure what you plan to do with the car, mostly street? Mostly drag racing? Road course?
Be realistic, i used to think street track, except i never went to the track, lol.

I don't see many Pros in the 3 inch.
Probably be crazy loud without cats.
Probably be crazy expensive with the cats.
Could have rattling issues going over the axle. You certainly aren't using road race style parts and an off the shelf catback.
Gains at this HP level will probably be minimal since you already have 1 5/8 headers (lmr states 20hp over STOCK headers)
Let's say they do gain 10hp over what you have now which is likely 400-425rwhp, is 10 more hp really going make it much better?
BTW, a quick search (could be wrong, not foxbody specific), suggests the collector on BBK 1 3/4 long tubes is 2.5 anyway.

I'd run what you have now and if you want to mix and match exhaust parts later, go ahead.

What i wouldn't do is run 24's or a 65mm Throttle body, your setup most likely exceeds both.
Click to expand...
Thanks for this response- price of 15k was canadian as i live in Canada- will likely just be a street car... i think ill stick with what i have and sell the BBK headers....what size throttle body do you recommend for the holley intake? i was told the 24 pnd injectors for this set up was plenty.....but i can still change this..
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,796
3,928
183
Claremore, OK
Sep 23, 2025
#14
  • Sep 23, 2025
  • #14
I’m running a 70mm TB, 80mm MAF, and 42 lb/hr injectors. If you get a new throttle body just bite the bullet and get an Accufab. I have a BBK (20 years old) so it’s okay but the new ones have their issues. I wish I would have got an Accufab as they are just a better design.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Sep 23, 2025
#15
  • Sep 23, 2025
  • #15
If the systemax will accept a 75mm (and i think it's one of the few that will, again check), i would run a 75mm accufab, i'll agree they are just the best, period.
If you were going to run the stock computer i would for sure says 30's, but since it sound like you are going to run a terminator setup, you have the ability to adjust for the injector size, so you could go bigger.
 

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,128
1,366
133
San Diego, CA
Sep 23, 2025
#16
  • Sep 23, 2025
  • #16
Only thing i don't like about the Accufabs is i believe they only come in chrome? I could be wrong but thats what i've noticed. Id like a satin finish Accufab for when i upgrade at some point.
 
D

dropteeth

Member
Apr 25, 2022
67
10
18
Ottawa
Sep 23, 2025
#17
  • Sep 23, 2025
  • #17
2000xp8 said:
If the systemax will accept a 75mm (and i think it's one of the few that will, again check), i would run a 75mm accufab, i'll agree they are just the best, period.
If you were going to run the stock computer i would for sure says 30's, but since it sound like you are going to run a terminator setup, you have the ability to adjust for the injector size, so you could go bigger.
Click to expand...
i just realized my throttle body is a 70mm BBK ( i still may upgrade to a 75mm accufab) but you have me shopping for injectors now.,.. with the terminator what injectors and brand do you recommend I get?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Sep 24, 2025
#18
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #18
I'm not totally sure 5 mm is worth the effort to change the throttle body at this point. I kinda felt like 10mm was...
I probably would, but that's because i'm a big accufab fan, not sure what the gains would be though.

If you are using an entire terminator X setup (not sure if they make just a plug and play ECU), first thing you need to do is see if the injectors are EV1 (old style) or EV6 (newer). I've always used ford racing injectors which were probably bosch, but go a little more on what the other guys suggest, i've been out of the injector brand game for a long time.
 
Reactions: dropteeth

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,796
3,928
183
Claremore, OK
Sep 24, 2025
#19
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #19
So just for reference the 65mm Accufab will almost flow what the BBK 70mm unit will.

BBK 70mm - 726 cfm

Accufab flow numbers:
Ford Mustang 5.0L, 1986-1993
Stock – 495cfm
65mm – 664cfm
70mm – 787cfm
70mm (Race) – 896cfm
75mm – 924cfm
75mm (Race) – 1045cfm
80mm – 1142cfm
85mm – 1322cfm
90mm – 1369cfm
105mm – 1550cfm

I really don’t think you will need anything larger than the one you have for the 347. There are all kinds of cfm calculators out there and I have used a few of them and they pretty much all came up with the same cfm for a given motor size. So for a 347 at 6500 rpm and a VE of 0.85 you get 680 cfm. So with the 70mm BBK flowing 726 cfm so you should be good to go. Just make sure the upper intake throttle body opening is 70mm or larger.

Was looking at the dyno numbers and imade a little more hp and torque than my 331. Two things come to mind which are I’d bet money the pistons are flat tops so you are in that 10:1 to 11:1 compression ratio area so yes super unleaded fuel and the cam is pretty mild based on the dyno. You can figure the lift by using a dial indicator on the rocker.
 
Last edited: Sep 24, 2025
Reactions: gkomo and dropteeth

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,796
3,928
183
Claremore, OK
Sep 24, 2025
#20
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #20
Did some digging and found this jewel of a thread on throttle body sizing.

Thread 'Anyone want to discuss throttle bodies? Is bigger better?'

Mar 25, 2007
Much debate is brought about over throttle body sizing and the effects of each.

I decided to bring out a little fact and a little common practice, so pardon some of it being unorganized, but I put this together quickly and wanted some feedback and thought. If there is anything you see that you feel is inaccurate or bias please post up and we will go from there

I notice that there are a few stangers out there with the notion that a bigger throttle body has no effect on engine performance or drivability and is needed to get the correct amount of air in the engine. I attend to show...
  • 5spd GT
  • Replies: 24
  • Forum: Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
 
Reactions: dropteeth
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which SN95 axles for 93 LX, disc brakes, ABS rings?
  • dan50
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
367
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
B
water pump installation questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
General karthief
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
525
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
764
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
479
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?