• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Got the 331 tuned

  • Thread starter Thread starter wmorris132
  • Start date Start date Jun 3, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
W

wmorris132

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
13
0
1
Jun 3, 2009
#1
  • Jun 3, 2009
  • #1
Well, my 331 build is finally finished! I had Woody at Fordstrokers.com build the shortblock and with help from a buddy, I did the rest. Its about 10:1 compression with Twisted wedge heads, Track heat intake and tfs stage 2 cam. BBK longtubes and o/r h-pipe. Lightning maf and 42lb injectors. It made 329.5hp and 367.5tq at the wheels. Thanks to Brian at Dynotune Motorsports for all of his help with the tune!
 

Suspect

Active Member
Aug 25, 2004
256
0
26
GA.
Jun 4, 2009
#2
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #2
whats the timing at?
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Jun 4, 2009
#3
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #3
wmorris132 said:
Well, my 331 build is finally finished! I had Woody at Fordstrokers.com build the shortblock and with help from a buddy, I did the rest. Its about 10:1 compression with Twisted wedge heads, Track heat intake and tfs stage 2 cam. BBK longtubes and o/r h-pipe. Lightning maf and 42lb injectors. It made 329.5hp and 367.5tq at the wheels. Thanks to Brian at Dynotune Motorsports for all of his help with the tune!
Click to expand...

Nice work. I bet that hauls nicely from stop light to stop light. Toss the dyno graph up if you get the chance.

Adam
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 4, 2009
#4
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #4
very nice torque numbers! maybe i'm just out of touch but that hp seems a bit low maybe not, i don't know.
 

Farmers SN95

Member
Jun 2, 2006
76
0
6
Ky
Jun 4, 2009
#5
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #5
Woody at Fordstrokers did my 331 shortblock to, good guy.
 

gmkillr

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
606
1
18
Jun 4, 2009
#6
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #6
Woody is da man!

A different intake & cam, & you could have yourself a good bit more h.p.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jun 4, 2009
#7
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #7
I dont think it is low at all personally. I bet he has great driveability too. I think we've all been shooting so high with these internet dyno brags, that we've killed driveability just for a number. We including me. I mean, sheesh, I am going in reverse toning down this..dragster.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 4, 2009
#8
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #8
Kinda hard to relate without details like STD or SAE
and
Without seeing the curves ... Well ... Who knows

Post up the pull and don't keep us in the dark

Grady
 

jromeo

New Member
Mar 5, 2006
16
0
0
charleston sc.
Jun 4, 2009
#9
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #9
Im thinking about having fordstokers do a bare block for my 331kit or selling the 331 and having them do a 347 short block.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0050.webp
    46.3 KB · Views: 133
W

wmorris132

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
13
0
1
Jun 4, 2009
#10
  • Jun 4, 2009
  • #10
I tried to load the dyno sheets, hopefully it worked. One of them is an overlay with the stock cobra motor with pullies, jlt intake, shortie headers and o/r h-pipe.
 

Attachments

  • dyno.webp
    28.9 KB · Views: 148
  • dyno2.webp
    30.3 KB · Views: 144

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
Jun 5, 2009
#11
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #11
300+ rwtrq from 2300-5600 out of a 331 looks pretty good to me. Look at his combo, all off the shelf, no custom porting, just stuff you could get from summit.

Nice work!

Adam
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Jun 5, 2009
#12
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #12
that torque curve is nasty looking! nice flat and smooth. 300tq at 2500 rpm, i'll take that any day.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 5, 2009
#13
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #13
You are leaving ALOT of power on the table with that setup. Still not too bad.

Throw on a Edelbrock RPM II intake, 80+mm Accufab TB, and a different cam. I bet your car picks up 50rwhp or more and alittle more torque without giving up and driveability.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 5, 2009
#14
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #14
Pokageek said:
I think we've all been shooting so high with these internet dyno brags, that we've killed driveability just for a number.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Virtually anyone can increase the timing and lean out the Air/Fuel ratio to find a power gain. Keeping a combination within safe margins, with stock-like driveability and impressive power is what is important.
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Jun 5, 2009
#15
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #15
ProKiller said:
that torque curve is nasty looking! nice flat and smooth. 300tq at 2500 rpm, i'll take that any day.
Click to expand...


i was thinking the same thing, hell he has 275tq as soon as he hits the pedal.

and like adam said not bad at all for just a TF kit.

remember you paid for it, so as long as your happy with it that's what counts. if your looking to up the numbers in the future, it shouldn't be more than a cam swap for a bump.

btw how was your overall experience with woody? i have been considering either a 331 or 347 and his prices are very good.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 5, 2009
#16
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #16
Black Stampede said:
Agreed. Virtually anyone can increase the timing and lean out the Air/Fuel ratio to find a power gain. Keeping a combination within safe margins, with stock-like driveability and impressive power is what is important.
Click to expand...

To me going fast is important.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jun 5, 2009
#17
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #17
Nice looking set of curves

Notice the word ... Actual ... That means STD
therefore
If the pull was done with SAE calibration the values would be lower

All in all ... Like Adam said ... for ots stuff ... I think it is pretty good

A more suited intake would not hurt drivability IMHO
and
I don't think it would shift the tq curve up much ... if any

With the added cubes ......
A bit more radical cam would not act as radical
as if
You only had the OEM block to work with

anywho ... I'd have to say that would be a REAL FUN street car

Grady
 
W

wmorris132

New Member
Oct 9, 2006
13
0
1
Jun 5, 2009
#18
  • Jun 5, 2009
  • #18
Woody was great, a real down to earth guy with lots of knowledge. I'm glad I went with him.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Jun 6, 2009
#19
  • Jun 6, 2009
  • #19
Stopsign32v said:
To me going fast is important.
Click to expand...

As is for me. However, I won't compromise driveability for it.
 
S

Stopsign32v

Member
May 18, 2008
394
0
16
Gville, SC
Jun 6, 2009
#20
  • Jun 6, 2009
  • #20
Black Stampede said:
As is for me. However, I won't compromise driveability for it.
Click to expand...

Then you have to go with a power adder
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
498
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
LESS THAN 9.5 MPG CITY DRIVING!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 15, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
92
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2023
PonyGTrider
SOLD 1993 Mustang Cobra / 114K miles / Modified / Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
  • Naja
  • Oct 4, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
5
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Feb 26, 2025
Naja
New to me Fox body. Looking for Rough HP and compression ratio
  • Halford4491
  • Oct 30, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?