• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How to hit low 11's/high 10's NA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agent007kimball
  • Start date Start date Feb 8, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
50
PA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Feb 10, 2004
#21
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #21
More displacement with the right combo will surely only help the goal...

I left mine stock because I want to fit into local class racing for headsup which strokers are not allowed to run...
 

RyanSG

Founding Member
Oct 24, 2002
286
0
17
41
Allentown, Pa
www.sloppymechanic.com
Feb 10, 2004
#22
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #22
I've been wondering what kind of HP are we talkin about to get around low 11's? 400,500..... i know traction is a big deal as well, so we'll go with nitto 555R's with upper and lower control arms. all on a reg 89Gt no lighter then factory.
Any ideas? (i know it's hard to judge the driver means a lot to etc...etc... many variables)
 
2

2001droptizzy

New Member
Sep 2, 2003
99
0
0
Humboldt
Feb 10, 2004
#23
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #23
393stroker
 
2

2001droptizzy

New Member
Sep 2, 2003
99
0
0
Humboldt
Feb 10, 2004
#24
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #24
393 stroker with big aftermarket heads

forged internals

good traction

fair driving skills

Fox body
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
50
PA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Feb 10, 2004
#25
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #25
RyanSG said:
I've been wondering what kind of HP are we talkin about to get around low 11's? 400,500..... i know traction is a big deal as well, so we'll go with nitto 555R's with upper and lower control arms. all on a reg 89Gt no lighter then factory.
Any ideas? (i know it's hard to judge the driver means a lot to etc...etc... many variables)
Click to expand...

With what you said I am going to say over 400 at the wheels would get some low 11's with that..
 

RyanSG

Founding Member
Oct 24, 2002
286
0
17
41
Allentown, Pa
www.sloppymechanic.com
Feb 10, 2004
#26
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #26
thas what i'm lookin to hear!!! lol should be on the dyno end of feb. we'll see what the beast puts out then. Thx
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
47
Dallas, GA
Feb 10, 2004
#27
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #27
Black331Stang said:
90Mustang, what setup u looking at for teh 306 to go 11s??
Click to expand...

Well, I'm still looking at 12's N/A but maby down the road a little.

Traction is so much of the ET. People have gotten into the 12's with just gears, weight reduction, and a full drag suspension on otherwise stock 5.0 Foxbody. So I suppose that the 11's wouldn't be that difficult but the MPH would be minimal, but were talking ET's here.

A high revving 3.00" stroked 302 with good flowing induction and exaust can get there I have no doubt. There is more than just CID when it comes to building power, although it is a major player in a good team. A well balanced engine with a good valvetrain can also be a major player.
 

JETHRO

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
410
0
16
51
ALTOONA PA
Feb 13, 2004
#28
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #28
perkys stang said:
With my 306CI FTI custom cam.... Lightly and I mean lightly ported TFS TW heads.. Stock out of the bax Holley SysteMax Intake... 10:1 comp... Went 11.12 @ 121 @ 3125lbs

It's all in the combo... There is a big gap between low 11's and high 10's.. you need to pick on for your goal because both will require different amounts of work... It's a much bigger gap then say low 14 to high 13's.. It just takes more power to make up the difference..

Going to want longtubes/ Good size Injector / and the right parts matched up top...
Click to expand...


holy f$%# perky when did you get your car to do that. when i saw you at mason dixon about a year and a half ago you just broke out of the twelves. now you got hail mary's with both wheels up.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
49
PA
www.rnhperformance.com
Feb 13, 2004
#29
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #29
Bill just optimized his combo with a few good "choice" parts and lightened up the car a bit....

It's all in the COMPLETE combo
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
50
PA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Feb 13, 2004
#30
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #30
I just got this a couple days ago.. Check it out...

http://home.comcast.net/~wicked46/Perk1112.wmv

Thanks to wicked4.6 on RacersDen!!!!
 
A

autoXr1

Founding Member
May 3, 2001
1,838
0
0
Michigan
Feb 13, 2004
#31
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #31
Suspension and traction are probably as, if not more important ingredients than power. Your 60' times should be below 1.5 sec. to nail down those times.

I have a performance calculator on my computer, and for what its worth, at 2900lbs, 11.00 ET, you should need around 430rwhp. Yes, I realize there are other variables, but it should give you some idea.

Pure Street cars are coming in at around 3000lbs and around 450rwhp to make those numbers, so that seems about right.

Perky...very nice. Prota-gay... Too bad someone's big head got in the way during the video, you just see the wheels lift, then the back of someones head Oh well. Nice job.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
49
PA
www.rnhperformance.com
Feb 13, 2004
#32
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #32
Sweet
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
50
PA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Feb 13, 2004
#33
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #33
autoXr1 said:
Suspension and traction are probably as, if not more important ingredients than power. Your 60' times should be below 1.5 sec. to nail down those times.

I have a performance calculator on my computer, and for what its worth, at 2900lbs, 11.00 ET, you should need around 430rwhp. Yes, I realize there are other variables, but it should give you some idea.

Pure Street cars are coming in at around 3000lbs and around 450rwhp to make those numbers, so that seems about right.
Click to expand...
I think your numbers are a little high.. I know what some of the faster PS cars run 10.50/10.60's are making I have seen the sheets.. and PS car weighed in at 3150 last year and 3100 this year

Here are the raw numbers from my car last year.....

3125lbs 11.12 @ 120.7 RWHP 370 with 60' of 1.45
 
N

Nitrous Tommy

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
37
0
0
CHI-ILL
Feb 13, 2004
#34
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #34
stage 3 ported heads/intake, custom cam,150 shot
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
50
PA
stangnet.cardomain.com
Feb 13, 2004
#35
  • Feb 13, 2004
  • #35
Nitrous Tommy said:
stage 3 ported heads/intake, custom cam,150 shot
Click to expand...


N/A
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
S
Can I add a low boost (turbo or s/c) setup to this configuration?
  • SlyFox91
  • Mar 17, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2023
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?