• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

IM GOING TURBO

  • Thread starter Thread starter 91 HATCH
  • Start date Start date Jan 1, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
Jan 1, 2008
#1
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #1
IM GETTING READY TO ORDER THE HP PERFORMANCE TURBO KIT


After seeing the build up in the mm&ff on the stock motor fox im no longer going to get a supercharger they changed my mind.

They got 433 rwhp and 493 rwtq on 10 psi of boost and a stock efi motor.

I will get pictures of it and my install when it arrives

The kit costs 4500.00 here it is http://www.turbochargedpower.com/79-93 Mustang.htm

I was looking at the blowzilla/flowzilla and by the time i got everything i needed it would be about the same price


HERE IS A PICTURE OF IT

 

Attachments

  • KitMockup-Black.webp
    23.8 KB · Views: 114
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Jan 1, 2008
#2
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #2
Turbo = TORQUE FTMFW!!!!
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Jan 1, 2008
#3
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #3
If you read into the article they turned the wick up to 16psi and made 531/643. That's no ****in joke with a stock motor. Turbo ftmfw. Just FYI, there's a lot of other really nice turbo kits out there with everything included, and a bigger turbo for around $3k.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Jan 1, 2008
#4
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #4
If I got a turbo I would stay with HP or Hellion.
Hellion had a build up a year or so ago in one of the mags.They a bullet proof bottom end but the rest was mellow. An E cam with GT40 heads and intake. They cranked it up to only 15 psi and made 700+HP to the wheels! It was cool because it was a stock looking 5.0, still had 16' ponies. All this and the kit lets you keep the stock AC
The kit was 4999.00 and uses Bassani exhaust components.
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jan 1, 2008
#5
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #5
Build it yourself. MasterPower T70 with B&G piping. Mad savings.
 
B

bentley429

Banned
Nov 25, 2004
528
3
0
Connecticut
Jan 1, 2008
#6
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #6
Yep, turbos rule. Good luck.
 
M

mavmavv

New Member
Nov 21, 2007
185
0
0
Jan 1, 2008
#7
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #7
Dont turn up the boost too much, the block will crack right down the middle. If you are really serious about a turbo setup check out www.turbomustangs.com
 
9

92GreenGT

PEAT
Founding Member
Jul 18, 2002
2,085
1
46
Big Stone Gap, VA
Jan 1, 2008
#8
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #8
I know a guy that has an HP kit for sale, if your interested I'll give you his info.

BTW, turbos are nice.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,023
1,615
194
NJ
Jan 1, 2008
#9
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #9
Be careful with a turbo on a stock engine, the stock HG's don't usually enjoy all that much boost.
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jan 1, 2008
#10
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #10
If you're spending $4000+ on a turbo kit, the least you can do is spend $100 on new HG's..
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
Jan 1, 2008
#11
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #11
i have new arp bolts and cometic hg's
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jan 1, 2008
#12
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #12
Atta boy.
 

BLOWN 5.0 FOX

Member
Apr 4, 2005
213
0
16
NORTH SHORE MA
Jan 1, 2008
#13
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #13
personally Id go with a motor now. Do it all at once, you dont want to do the same job twice, not to mention pay for 2 tunes. good luck!
 

91 HATCH

Banned
May 17, 2007
262
0
0
illinois
Jan 1, 2008
#14
  • Jan 1, 2008
  • #14
im a dragracer im going to boost the stock motor till it goes 10-16# or so
 
R

RS200

Member
Sep 23, 2004
95
0
16
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jan 2, 2008
#15
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #15
91 HATCH said:
im a dragracer im going to boost the stock motor till it goes 10-16# or so
Click to expand...

14 psi is borderline for reliability on track. I'd stay at 9-10 psi for street, 14 for track, and 18 if you want a new motor in a hurry.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jan 2, 2008
#16
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #16
What support did this car have to make those numbers?

My friends car we put a Hellion kit on, with an intake and exhaust it made 350/420, Nowhere close to the power listed here. I have NO idea on how well his was tuned, but being 80 rwhp, and 70-80 rwtq difference I can't imagine that's all in a tune?
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Jan 2, 2008
#17
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #17
25thmustang said:
What support did this car have to make those numbers?

My friends car we put a Hellion kit on, with an intake and exhaust it made 350/420, Nowhere close to the power listed here. I have NO idea on how well his was tuned, but being 80 rwhp, and 70-80 rwtq difference I can't imagine that's all in a tune?
Click to expand...

I didn't see too much about the setup. The article was more for the suspension they were putting on the car than the turbo setup. From the little bit of it that I could see I think it had a stock intake. It has a 200k mile stock long block. They said they decked the heads to make sure they were flat and put in good gaskets and studs. I don't know how serious the tune was or if they were running pump gas or race gas. I believe 80 rwhp could easily be found in a tune on a boost car. Bentley's car found 200rwhp from a tune! I have seen several stock long block turbo cars over 400 rwhp though.
 

JGT

Member
Oct 29, 2006
0
0
7
Charleston, SC
Jan 2, 2008
#18
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #18
25thmustang said:
What support did this car have to make those numbers?

My friends car we put a Hellion kit on, with an intake and exhaust it made 350/420, Nowhere close to the power listed here. I have NO idea on how well his was tuned, but being 80 rwhp, and 70-80 rwtq difference I can't imagine that's all in a tune?
Click to expand...

Those are the lowest numbers I've seen with the Hellion kit.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Jan 2, 2008
#19
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #19
You always have to be weary of dyno numbers with turbo setups. You will quite often find inflated dyno numbers when taken from higher elevations. You cannot apply STD elevation correction factors to a turbo setup the same way as an n/a one, as the turbo will mostly create it's own atmosphere…and be greatly un-affected by elevation changes. This is of course why turbo setups are so greatly praised in higher elevations….as they don't suffer the losses that n/a setups do.

Also, there are many factors with turbo's that can be detrimental to power output. Simply removing a chambered exhaust for example can net upwards of 50rwhp on a turbo setup. In the same token, timing too has a critical role…and it's easy to ring out an extra 50rwhp by getting a bit more aggressive in regards to your timing curve.

I'd also look into one of the many turbo kit alternatives available. There are a few out there that offer exceptional build quality along with a reasonable price. There is no reason you should have to dish out $4k+ on a turbo kit when there are alternatives that can be had for a little over $3k.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jan 2, 2008
#20
  • Jan 2, 2008
  • #20
blackened88lx said:
I didn't see too much about the setup. The article was more for the suspension they were putting on the car than the turbo setup. From the little bit of it that I could see I think it had a stock intake. It has a 200k mile stock long block. They said they decked the heads to make sure they were flat and put in good gaskets and studs. I don't know how serious the tune was or if they were running pump gas or race gas. I believe 80 rwhp could easily be found in a tune on a boost car. Bentley's car found 200rwhp from a tune! I have seen several stock long block turbo cars over 400 rwhp though.
Click to expand...

Yes but the car made that power after getting tuned. I don't think a tuner could possibly leave 80 rwhp on the table from another one, or maybe they could?

His numbers did seem low to me, but who am I to complain, all I did was put the kit on for him.

He does have chambered mufflers, and I have heard 50 rwhp might happen, and the tune might be weak or even wrong, I just take a lot of magazine stuff with a grain of salt. Afterall those companies pay the bills, of course the product is going to perform well.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351w turbo build.... Turbo guys teach me things...
  • Kid wita 5oh
  • Oct 22, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2025
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
9
4.6 2v running rich
  • 98stanggt98
  • Aug 28, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2023
98stanggt98
9
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
483
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?