• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

KB 2.6 question

  • Thread starter Thread starter 04GTMustang
  • Start date Start date Jul 21, 2008

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Jul 21, 2008
#1
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #1
I was wondering what the lowest amount of boost that could be run on the 2.6KB. there website shows 9-25psi is what its rated for but someone was telling me that 13psi is the lowest it will go on the 2.6l. Not that i was looking at them or anything

if i did get this kit it wouldnt be for another year till i built the motor thats why i am asking. otherwise ill just go with a 2.1
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Jul 21, 2008
#2
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #2
kb 2.6 has the widest range of psi rating and its better for high boost because its wayyyyy more efficient then if you were to get the lower model and run high boost,but if you dont want to run more than like 12psi there isnt much sense to getting it.
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Jul 21, 2008
#3
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #3
well im just saying because ill have it on for almost a full year before the motor gets built and i def wanna have a 600rwhp car and the 2.1 probably wont get me there so thats why i was thinking just upgrade now and run the lowest amount of boost possible till its built
 

blckstng96

Member
Apr 13, 2004
208
0
16
Jul 21, 2008
#4
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #4
you should have no problem doing that at all,thats the same charger i plan to get,but running 18-20 psi haha
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 21, 2008
#5
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #5
You all need to shut up

Gonna make me put my suspension work on the back-burner, build the engine up, sell the 2.1 and upgrade to a 2.6 or 2.8...

I want 600hp almost as much as I wanted 400hp a year ago. Although I can wait on lowering my gas milage below the 8mpg (city) I already get.

But to stay on topic, I've heard of people running it as low as 9psi while they wait for money to build up their engine. You'll see lower air temps running 9psi on the bigger blower, but you'll also have more parasitic loss from spinning the bigger screws. No idea at what point the 2.6 outdoes the 2.1, other than 14+, which is out of the 2.1's generally accepted range.
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Jul 21, 2008
#6
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #6
thanks for the advice guys. once the motor is built it will be around the 18psi range. not exactly sure what the hp will be at that boost level but im guessing somewhere in the 600 area lol. also when i mean build the motor im talking blower cams and ported heads too lol. gotta try and out run my bike
 
H

HOOCBB

New Member
Jun 5, 2008
90
3
0
Jul 21, 2008
#7
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #7
How about a twin turbo kit? You can get the twin 50mm kit for the stock internals, then upgrade it to the 57, 67 or 76 mm twins when the bottom end is ready for more. Comes with tubular k member and coil over setup, x pipe etc. I believe everything you'll need (except labor) is included in the kit.

96-04 Mustang Twin Turbo Kit

I like how the turbos are hidden in the bumpers, but I'm not sure how they don't melt the urethane. Pop the hood and at first glance, it doesn't look boosted.

I'd even be willing to put the stock grille back on my 02 to hide the BOVs...
 

04GTMustang

New Member
Feb 28, 2006
348
0
0
Stafford
Jul 21, 2008
#8
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #8
HOOCBB said:
How about a twin turbo kit? You can get the twin 50mm kit for the stock internals, then upgrade it to the 57, 67 or 76 mm twins when the bottom end is ready for more. Comes with tubular k member and coil over setup, x pipe etc. I believe everything you'll need (except labor) is included in the kit.

96-04 Mustang Twin Turbo Kit

I like how the turbos are hidden in the bumpers, but I'm not sure how they don't melt the urethane. Pop the hood and at first glance, it doesn't look boosted.

I'd even be willing to put the stock grille back on my 02 to hide the BOVs...
Click to expand...

well i actually have been thinking turbo too but what i also havent told yet is i will go turbo with a supercharger lol. I have been eying that new hellion compound boost setup thats why i just started decided to go KB lol. I can get the KB have insane amounts of low end then few years down the road after the motor is all built then TT it as well. by this time it wont be my daily driver anymore so a 1000+rwhp street car wont be bad lol.
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
Jul 21, 2008
#9
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #9




compound boost




 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

X
VE Table Not Dialed? Send Me Your Datalog.
  • X-cam34
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
49
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 1, 2026
X-cam34
X
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
292
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
8
Views
272
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 21, 2026
X-cam34
X
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
H
Drivetrain 4R70W clutch friction/metals/piston set up questions for transmission guru
  • Hizdudeness
  • Apr 4, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
939
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 15, 2024
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?