I want a midpipe and catback to be my next two mods. Ive decided to go with either the American Thunder (aka Flow's) or the Flow Path (Mac's) catback. Leaning towards Mac though. They outflow the Flow's (ironic, eh?) and sound a little deeper.
But, so far I was pretty set on a UPR O/R X to match with, seeing as how X's give the best bang for the buck supposidly. I know most people say that an X pipe and chambered mufflers dont go together, but I kind of like the sound.
I dont want an H pipe on the car. If im gonna change it, might as well go a different route than another H. Even though an H and chambered mufflers is the sweetspot on the ears... I want the efficiency of an X pipe.
But, the next thing that popped into my head was teh ProChamber. How does one compare to an X performance wise? I know X's are good for up top power, H's good for low end tourqe... so whats the Chamber good for? If its a blend of both, then thats probaly the route ill go... I want it to still open up on the top end, but a little boost of low end would be more useable. Also gives a very nice and unique tone.
Ive allready seen some of your opinions about the UPR X when I posted about that a week ago or so, and im still not tossing that out... but im debating heavily between it or the ProChamber. If the Chamber gives equal performance, id probaly go that route for the sound.
But, so far I was pretty set on a UPR O/R X to match with, seeing as how X's give the best bang for the buck supposidly. I know most people say that an X pipe and chambered mufflers dont go together, but I kind of like the sound.
I dont want an H pipe on the car. If im gonna change it, might as well go a different route than another H. Even though an H and chambered mufflers is the sweetspot on the ears... I want the efficiency of an X pipe.
But, the next thing that popped into my head was teh ProChamber. How does one compare to an X performance wise? I know X's are good for up top power, H's good for low end tourqe... so whats the Chamber good for? If its a blend of both, then thats probaly the route ill go... I want it to still open up on the top end, but a little boost of low end would be more useable. Also gives a very nice and unique tone.
Ive allready seen some of your opinions about the UPR X when I posted about that a week ago or so, and im still not tossing that out... but im debating heavily between it or the ProChamber. If the Chamber gives equal performance, id probaly go that route for the sound.