• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

My 95 GTS 356 build thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang95GTS
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2011
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#1
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #1
I have been a member off and on here for some time but have not been very active. I wanted to share my build that came together over this summer/fall.
I have a 95 GTS with the current mods:
9.2 Dart Iron Eagle block
Sonny Bryant Billet crank
Carillo billet rods
Diamond forged pistons coated on top and sides
Trick flow 170 heads w/ 205 intake and 1.60 exhaust flowing 305 & 235 @ 600
AFM B451 cam
9.2 super victor intake converted to EFI
75 lb low impedance injectors
AFM Big tube 1 3/4" shorty headers
Vortech T trim w/ 7" lower and 3.33 upper
AFM power pipe.
G-force T-5 w/ super king cobra clutch
FMS 3.55 rears



 

Attachments

  • 20110724215146.webp
    146.5 KB · Views: 114
  • 20110723194243.webp
    160.6 KB · Views: 114
  • 20110723194223.webp
    155.9 KB · Views: 127

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,638
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 17, 2011
#2
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #2
Awesome build. Jesus dude, what did they do to get a set of TF 170s to flow 305/235. That much port work constitutes sodomy. That's flat out awesome.

Kurt
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#3
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #3
Dual Walbro's from Glenn's performance sleeper kit


New engine to go in!

 

Attachments

  • 20110723194032.webp
    165 KB · Views: 123
  • 20110807220009.webp
    175.1 KB · Views: 119
  • 20110827165835.webp
    190.7 KB · Views: 124
  • 20110901200030.webp
    181.5 KB · Views: 115
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#4
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #4
Lots of port work but it looks great!
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#5
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #5
Old lower control arms vs new


if I never have to put in control arms again it will be too soon.


Snow performance methanol kit


Steeda caster camber plates


New seats
 

Attachments

  • 20110901163416.webp
    173.1 KB · Views: 122
  • 20110901194002.webp
    140.1 KB · Views: 107
  • 20110901195845.webp
    137.7 KB · Views: 120
  • 20110909153910.webp
    170.8 KB · Views: 118
  • 20110910165512.webp
    138.1 KB · Views: 104

wht93gtEd

Active Member
Nov 11, 2004
0
9
29
Jersey Shore, New Jersey
Nov 17, 2011
#6
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #6
Hopefully you have better luck with the Steeda plates than I had with my 93.
They never stayed in position, regardless of following the exact Steeda torque specs for them.

They always seemed to slide out of alignment over time.
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#7
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #7
Engine installed








Here is the dyno graph: tuned by Mike Post

 

Attachments

  • 20110914191508.webp
    166.9 KB · Views: 122
  • 20111116190319.webp
    155.6 KB · Views: 113
  • 20111116190248.webp
    167.1 KB · Views: 115
  • dynograph.webp
    84.1 KB · Views: 135
  • 20111022135132.webp
    189.2 KB · Views: 128
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#8
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #8
I was thinking of going to a 3.15 upper pulley and getting about 19 lbs of boost out of it, but as it is 1st and 2nd gear are hard enough to control.
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#9
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #9
Dyno Video
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/2421/gvy.mp4
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 17, 2011
#10
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #10


which intake elbow is that?
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Nov 17, 2011
#11
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #11
This build thread was the quickest ever. Already finished in one day. Great work!
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#12
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #12
its an edelbrock, which number I am not sure, only 4" tall. Yeah, I took a bunch of pics and figured I would share them. If it took 1 day I would be extremely happy, unfortunately many times in the several months I worked on it I was contemplating rolling it outside and setting it on fire.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 17, 2011
#13
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #13
can you post a pic or 2 of the clearance over the valve covers?

are they stock height valve covers, or tall?

i have a victor junior efi that i have been dragging my feet on trying to decide which elbow had the best chance of clearing the valve covers and also staying under my hood.
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#14
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #14
yeah it is tight with a capital T. I had to modify my throttle bracket to adjust upward and have 2 spacers. One is a 1" tall and the other is a 3/8" tall. The valve covers are FMS Tall to clear the studs for the rockers.
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#15
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #15
Here is the pics as requested







 

Attachments

  • 20111117150144.webp
    167.5 KB · Views: 113
  • 20111117150124.webp
    175.7 KB · Views: 114
  • 20111117150211.webp
    170.7 KB · Views: 127
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#16
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #16
 

Attachments

  • 20111117150314.webp
    155.7 KB · Views: 119
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#17
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #17
This is a 9.2 block so it is a bit shorter but not by much
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 17, 2011
#18
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #18
good info, thanks.

fyi, i have comp pro magnum rockers which fit under stock height valve covers. going to those might help with your clearance concerns. of course, you have already addressed it, so maybe it's not a concern any more, but it might be useful info in the future ...

9.2 ... so that's a 302 block stroked and bored to 356?
 
M

Mustang95GTS

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
96
0
0
Nov 17, 2011
#19
  • Nov 17, 2011
  • #19
302 is a 8.2 deck height block, a 351 is a 9.5 deck height. A 9.2 is between the two of them, used most often as I understand it for nascar type engines. Mine has a 302 main, but it uses a 351 distributor. Kind of a little of both engines.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Mag’s 86 Vert build thread
  • magnum517
  • Mar 8, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 9, 2020
magnum517
M
L
Fox My 90' Turbo Foxbody Build
  • Lawless90
  • May 15, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 3 4 5
Replies
83
Views
32K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 6, 2017
Lawless90
L
S
  • Locked
1995 Mustang Convertible Road Racer
  • skrapmetal
  • May 29, 2011
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 20, 2011
skrapmetal
S
building a 408 this winter, opinions please
  • rbonella
  • Sep 3, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
761
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 3, 2009
rbonella
Another guess my Dyno # thread (high comp 347)
  • Joe 5.0
  • Jul 29, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2009
Joe 5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?