• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

My conclusion on mods, please review

  • Thread starter Thread starter peonslayer
  • Start date Start date May 22, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
P

poonstang16

New Member
Apr 18, 2006
29
0
0
Jun 13, 2006
#21
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • #21
L33T said:
I sure do.
Lemme get a pic of it.
Excuse the quality but I believe it's legible. (cell phone camera)

Two runs, labeled (1) and (2).
You can see a gain of 20rwhp and 20fptq on the run labeled (1), the only addition being the IMRC's.

The baseline run is not labeled but you can see it parallel the #2 run by about 8-10 hp, this was without the UD's and run #2 with was with UD's. (+8-10)



This was all graphed before I added the LT's and the Prochamber.
Hope it helps.
Click to expand...

How is this for driving around town? do you notice a reduction in torque with out the motion plates?
 

mhanksii

Member
Jan 3, 2006
336
0
16
Maryland
Jun 13, 2006
#22
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • #22
poonstang16 said:
How is this for driving around town? do you notice a reduction in torque with out the motion plates?
Click to expand...

I have herd this too anyone have some dyno numbers that start down at 2k rpm? or at least some personal experience with this?
 
P

Pro Mod

Member
Nov 16, 2005
236
0
16
Wharton, WV
Jun 13, 2006
#23
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • #23
I picked up 1.2 mph in the 1/8-mile with my charge motion delete plates. I say they are a VERY underrated mod. People dismiss them on theory. But in reality, they help. I don't have any dyno sheets with the cmrc deletes, but they definitely feel like they helped all over the rpm range. ALOT depends on your tune.

I can add 2 more things about the charge motion deletes...

1. they reduced the dreaded throttle hang time. My friends & I believe that the factory cmrc's are as much to blame for this as the drive by wire.

2. My car used to bog when powershifting to 3rd. Now with the cmrc deletes, the bog is gone. Even before I switched the plates out, my friends & I believed that the plates close between shifts.

Just two other small things to look at other than getting caught up in dyno sheets. They work on the track.
 
P

poonstang16

New Member
Apr 18, 2006
29
0
0
Jun 14, 2006
#24
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #24
Pro Mod said:
I picked up 1.2 mph in the 1/8-mile with my charge motion delete plates. I say they are a VERY underrated mod. People dismiss them on theory. But in reality, they help. I don't have any dyno sheets with the cmrc deletes, but they definitely feel like they helped all over the rpm range. ALOT depends on your tune.

I can add 2 more things about the charge motion deletes...

1. they reduced the dreaded throttle hang time. My friends & I believe that the factory cmrc's are as much to blame for this as the drive by wire.

2. My car used to bog when powershifting to 3rd. Now with the cmrc deletes, the bog is gone. Even before I switched the plates out, my friends & I believed that the plates close between shifts.

Just two other small things to look at other than getting caught up in dyno sheets. They work on the track.
Click to expand...

The reason for the plates is to add turbulant flow and higher kinetic energy to ensure a good fuel mixture and ram the air into the the cylinders when driving around NOT wide open throttle. This, in theory, should add much better torque when not running WOT. Do you notice a reduction in torque under normal acceleration conditions around town?
 
P

Pro Mod

Member
Nov 16, 2005
236
0
16
Wharton, WV
Jun 14, 2006
#25
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #25
The car is excellent around town, there is no power loss anywhere in the rpm range. Like I said above, all these people dismiss the cmrc's based on THEORY. I haven't talked to ONE SINGLE person that has ACTUALLY INSTALLED them and is displeased with them. I love them. btw I have no loss in gas mileage. My message center still says 23.4 mpg and I've had the plates for over a month now.
 
P

poonstang16

New Member
Apr 18, 2006
29
0
0
Jun 14, 2006
#26
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #26
Pro Mod said:
The car is excellent around town, there is no power loss anywhere in the rpm range. Like I said above, all these people dismiss the cmrc's based on THEORY. I haven't talked to ONE SINGLE person that has ACTUALLY INSTALLED them and is displeased with them. I love them. btw I have no loss in gas mileage. My message center still says 23.4 mpg and I've had the plates for over a month now.
Click to expand...

cool! Thanks Pro
 

mhanksii

Member
Jan 3, 2006
336
0
16
Maryland
Jun 16, 2006
#27
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #27
Sounds like I need to start warming up the old credit card again then
 

lukoi66

New Member
Jun 14, 2006
14
0
0
Jun 16, 2006
#28
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #28
So, all that I've read about 450rwhp before forged internals is considered to be a debunked limit for the 3v by many here? (I mean after you add a poweradder to the engine).

I was seriously looking at adding an adder and mods than would have conceivably taken me to around 460rwhp but getting forged pistons and rods done as well. I would love to reach that range (my top end goal actually) without putting my daily driver at undue risk. I don't intend to drive the car like I stole it all of the time, but I do want the option occasionally.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
909
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
737
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
929
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
G
Expired 2013 Ford Mustang V6 (Grabber Blue) 3:55 gears... Excellent Condition.
  • Grabberblueguy77
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
2
Views
467
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Mar 11, 2026
Grabberblueguy77
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?