• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Need Opinions On Upgrades

  • Thread starter Thread starter Great88
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2016
  • Tags Tags
    foxbody help upgrade
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last

OneWheelPeel

Active Member
Dec 23, 2015
250
42
48
North Carolina
Apr 6, 2016
#41
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #41
And torque box reinforcements. It sucks fixing them once they're ****ed up...
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
G

Great88

Member
Dec 5, 2014
59
4
8
Ontario Canada
Apr 6, 2016
#42
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #42
im not 100 percent if the torque boxes were done before i purchased the car but im almost certain they were. And i know for a fact that the subframe connectors have already been done. Whats the next steps after that lol?
 
G

Great88

Member
Dec 5, 2014
59
4
8
Ontario Canada
Apr 6, 2016
#43
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #43
also if i were to move onto doing piece by piece and not all at once because the budget currently doesnt allow for that what would be the process and what order should it be done in? please and thank you
 

cleanLX

Founding Member
Jan 17, 2001
976
537
144
Apr 6, 2016
#44
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #44
I'm no expert, but I really don't believe converting to mass air is required (if keeping stock cam and heads...) so, someone correct me if I'm wrong, so intake and throttle body, go for it.
With tiny 125cc stock ports in the heads, you are not going to loose any low end throwing an intake and TB on it... just like you didn't when you put long tubes and 2.5" exhaust.
 

OneWheelPeel

Active Member
Dec 23, 2015
250
42
48
North Carolina
Apr 6, 2016
#45
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #45
You could put the explorer intake on now. Its not a bolt on but its easy.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 6, 2016
#46
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #46
OneWheelPeel said:
You could put the explorer intake on now. Its not a bolt on but its easy.
Click to expand...
Technically it bolts on
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 6, 2016
#47
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #47
stykthyn said:
Technically it bolts on
Click to expand...

I've always scratched my head over the term "bolt on"....
 
Reactions: stykthyn

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 6, 2016
#48
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #48
Boosted92LX said:
I've always scratched my head over the term "bolt on"....
Click to expand...
Honestly everything practically bolts on. I would think magazines mean accessories rather than swapping engine parts.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 6, 2016
#49
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #49
stykthyn said:
Honestly everything practically bolts on. I would think magazines mean accessories rather than swapping engine parts.
Click to expand...

"I've got bolt full bolt ons and NAWS!"

 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 6, 2016
#50
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #50
OneWheelPeel said:
You could put the explorer intake on now. Its not a bolt on but its easy.
Click to expand...

go back 5 posts and read my message again. Waste of time IMO.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 6, 2016
#51
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #51
I agree with what has been said- make the car handle, brake better first, then increase the hp. These cars came with terrible brakes and suspension for a 225hp car. Throw another 100hp on them and you are asking for trouble.

If you want to address hp, IMO the order would be
  • gears
  • shifter
  • 94-95 Gt 70MM MAF
  • K&N panel filter
  • good cat back exhaust
  • NOS kit
Then when you are ready, either a good H/C/I or a Vortech.
 
G

Great88

Member
Dec 5, 2014
59
4
8
Ontario Canada
Apr 6, 2016
#52
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #52
okay so everyone is sort of saying different things. I want to start the build but it seems like some are saying dont bother until you have a bunch of money to throw at and some are saying to go ahead and go piece by piece. I want to buy one throttle body. I dont want to waste money getting two of them. Same thing with the MAF since i dont have one. when i get my car out of storage i will double check about the speed density but from what im hearing you cannot do future mods like heads and cam without the car being converted to mass air. If anyone can clarify all of this that would be great. I just dont want to be in a position where i could pay one time for things that are needed and end up paying twice for unnecessary parts. Thanks again
 
Reactions: 1990slow50H

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Apr 6, 2016
#53
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #53
Op, this is what I'd do. Save your money for horsepower improvements. I've read so many threads today(super slow work day) that I can't remember what all you've done to the car. Assuming the chassis/suspension/and brakes are done...you can only add power. If your car is still speed density and you don't want to swap out to an aftermarket ecu system(not needed unless you plan on adding significant power), you will need to convert to MAF. Only if you're going to add h/c/i or forced induction is the conversion needed.

All the "little" boltons/swaps(i.e. Intakes,electric wp,etc etc) will add or free up small horsepower improvements. As a total you would feel an improvement but each individual change will be small. Until you can add more air/fuel into the motor via heads,cam,intake and/or supercharger/turbo/nitrous. You should read/research which direction you would like to go in. Then start saving and/or buying individual parts until you have acquired all of them. Then you will have to make sure you have the fuel system,transmission,etc that can support said power level.

Or just concentrate on aesthetics/suspension/brakes/wheels and tires and just enjoy the cars power level.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Apr 6, 2016
#54
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #54
for the record, on my 87 SD car, I had
  • gears
  • Nitrous
  • intake
  • edelbrock heads
  • headers
  • exhaust
  • SD friendly crane cam- think it was a 2030?
  • U/D pulleys- yeah it was 30 years ago
So you can add to a SD car without converting to MAF. The FAST system and others are SD. The problem comes when you start making big changes in a cam or a blower that the EEC can't compensate for. Then you need a chip burned. If you keep the stock cam, you can add 1.7 rockers and you will be fine.

What people are trying to say is- make a plan, save up, and do it right the first time. It all depends on what your goal, budget is. You will want to swap over to MAF only because it allows better tuning and options down the road..
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Apr 6, 2016
#55
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #55
mikestang63 said:
for the record, on my 87 SD car, I had
  • gears
  • Nitrous
  • intake
  • edelbrock heads
  • headers
  • exhaust
  • SD friendly crane cam- think it was a 2030?
  • U/D pulleys- yeah it was 30 years ago
So you can add to a SD car without converting to MAF. The FAST system and others are SD. The problem comes when you start making big changes in a cam or a blower that the EEC can't compensate for. Then you need a chip burned. If you keep the stock cam, you can add 1.7 rockers and you will be fine.

What people are trying to say is- make a plan, save up, and do it right the first time. It all depends on what your goal, budget is. You will want to swap over to MAF only because it allows better tuning and options down the road..
Click to expand...
Thanks. You said that much clearer than I did lol. Man I'm bored and been all over the internet today. Lol
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

OneWheelPeel

Active Member
Dec 23, 2015
250
42
48
North Carolina
Apr 6, 2016
#56
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #56
mikestang63 said:
go back 5 posts and read my message again. Waste of time IMO.
Click to expand...
I agree but he did ask for what would be next if he chose to go piece by piece. If he wanted to do that then it would probably be the next best thing. It would also be a good project to familiarize himself with the engine and maybe help him decide if HCI is something he'd want to attempt doing in the future.
 

OneWheelPeel

Active Member
Dec 23, 2015
250
42
48
North Carolina
Apr 6, 2016
#57
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #57
Great88 said:
okay so everyone is sort of saying different things. I want to start the build but it seems like some are saying dont bother until you have a bunch of money to throw at and some are saying to go ahead and go piece by piece. I want to buy one throttle body. I dont want to waste money getting two of them. Same thing with the MAF since i dont have one. when i get my car out of storage i will double check about the speed density but from what im hearing you cannot do future mods like heads and cam without the car being converted to mass air. If anyone can clarify all of this that would be great. I just dont want to be in a position where i could pay one time for things that are needed and end up paying twice for unnecessary parts. Thanks again
Click to expand...
There will never be a perfect answer on what to do next when it comes to cars. Everyone has different opinions on what they think is best and no one answer is the key to success. That's why we all mod our cars in the first place instead of buying saleen and roush mustangs. Its more fun to do it your way. Keep doing research and you'll get an idea of what you want.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
G

Great88

Member
Dec 5, 2014
59
4
8
Ontario Canada
Apr 6, 2016
#58
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #58
Okay so for a fact i know right now that i will not be putting a super/turbo charger on the car. Id prefer to stay with heads,cam and intake down the road.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Apr 6, 2016
#59
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #59
Perfect. What is your HP goal? Intended use for the car?
 
G

Great88

Member
Dec 5, 2014
59
4
8
Ontario Canada
Apr 6, 2016
#60
  • Apr 6, 2016
  • #60
id say like 300 at least at the rear wheels. more is better of course
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
91 GT Need help identifying parts and some issue.
  • MCMXCI_blkfox
  • Jun 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
185
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2025
General karthief
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Engine Radiator with no shroud provision... What to do?
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
325
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
FastDriver
M
Resolved 1988 Foxbody - Overheating Summer
  • MDrisc
  • Oct 26, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
663
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Friday at 12:37 PM
fasterthangas
F
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?