• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

old 302 & 88 intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter tinas90lx
  • Start date Start date Dec 19, 2004
T

tinas90lx

New Member
May 24, 2003
30
0
0
yakima
Dec 19, 2004
#1
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #1
i have an old 302 i got for $50 out of a '73 bronco years ago sitting on the garage floor at a friends house (that I forgot about) and recently aquired a stock '88 upper and lower intake that i won playing around on ebay. i was wonndering if they would work together or if I should just sell the intake. I want to build the 302 and put the juice to it but have no idea what combos are good. Have a 90 lx vert with 155 pump,aftermarket fmu, u/d pullies, o/r h-pipe w/2 cham. flows and a stock motor plus afew other little mods. would like to use old 302 block and have it machined. Any suggestions wuold help. Thanks.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Dec 19, 2004
#2
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #2
You can't use a roller cam in that block.
 
T

tinas90lx

New Member
May 24, 2003
30
0
0
yakima
Dec 19, 2004
#3
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #3
so would be better to trade it off or barter then???
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Dec 19, 2004
#4
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #4
It's really up to you I guess. I think there's a conversion kit to put a roller cam in a original non roller block....but it's probaby a pain in the neck....and pricy.
 
T

tinas90lx

New Member
May 24, 2003
30
0
0
yakima
Dec 19, 2004
#5
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #5
i'm kinda on a limited budget, so i probably wont be able to do that. What about the intake?? are there ways to get better airflow or performance out of them?? i.e. grind or dremel down any roughspots per say??
 

jeffnoel

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2002
1,638
5
37
Clovis, CA
Dec 19, 2004
#6
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #6
maverick0716 said:
You can't use a roller cam in that block.
Click to expand...

Wrong, you can use a roller cam in that block. You just need to get a small base circle roller cam, from Comp or Crane, and then drill t small holes in the lifter valley to bolt the spider to. The cam will cost about the same as any other roller cam they're all a little pricey and you can get the roller lifters, dog-bones and spider on eBay for 20-50 buck. You will also need pushrods from a roller motor.

Or you could go a regular base roller cam and use aftermaket roller lifters but they are 3-400 bucks a set
 
T

tinas90lx

New Member
May 24, 2003
30
0
0
yakima
Dec 19, 2004
#7
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #7
good deal, i wuold like to try to use the old block, save some $$$$. I'll be looking into those for my Christmas present to myself. much appreciated!! Should i try to use that extra stock intake i have or just buy a new one. thanks again for everyone's help.
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Dec 19, 2004
#8
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #8
To save some money, you could go with a flat cam. Not as good as a roller, but you can still make plenty of power with one. Look in my sig!
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Dec 19, 2004
#9
  • Dec 19, 2004
  • #9
PM Tmoss - he ports the stock lower to flow really good for a reasonable price.
 
T

tinas90lx

New Member
May 24, 2003
30
0
0
yakima
Dec 20, 2004
#10
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #10
right on, thanks for the info. sorry it took so long to reply, had to go see a friend with worse luck than mine at the ER. i most definarely will be looking into it. it snowed and things are freezing up so it'll be in the heated garage til early spring. Thanks again
 
V

v8only

Active Member
Jul 3, 2003
2,378
22
49
Dec 20, 2004
#11
  • Dec 20, 2004
  • #11
To answer his original question, which didn't involve the cam, yes, the upper/lower efi intake would work.

Honestly, pitch that engine, it's a complete pos. It's factory rated at 141hp, and you're gonna have to build the **** out of it just to get it to stock hp levels of the later roller engine years. I know nothing about the roller "conversion" other that my trusted friend says the kit to do this properly is expensive. IMO, ditch the block and start off with a roller block. Nowadays, roller engines cost nothing. I just gave one away (practically) in perfect running condit for $350 pan to intake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
P
New to StangNET
  • Popeye1790
  • Apr 19, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
915
The Welcome Wagon Apr 19, 2024
Popeye1790
P
J
Engine 302 Intake Manifold
  • joekurt
  • Mar 8, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 10, 2022
joekurt
J
So confirming what I need to do to put a '88 CV 302/AOD in my '65 A-code.
  • 1320stang
  • Apr 19, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2023
1320stang
The Most Preferred Aluminum heads
  • SSnakeGT127
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 28, 2021
SSnakeGT127
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?