• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

PCV or breather???

  • Thread starter Thread starter riceslayer302
  • Start date Start date Oct 21, 2008

riceslayer302

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
0
1
0
CT
Oct 21, 2008
#1
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #1
im finishing up my stroker project, its a N/A 331 setup with 10:5:1 compression, .598 lift comp cam, AFR185 58cc, scorpion 1.6's, and an RPM II. i am not sure if i should run a breather cap or the stock PCV. i have deleted the smog pump, charcoal cannister, and egr... any suggestions???
 

stangzilla100

New Member
Oct 19, 2008
106
0
0
Oct 21, 2008
#2
  • Oct 21, 2008
  • #2
i have a whipple SC on my s197. i did plumb in a catch can into the pcv system, but have since put in breathers instead. it runs fine, i cant tell any difference, but it does look cleaner and less stuff in the engine area. i like it better w/ the breathers.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Oct 22, 2008
#3
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #3
The PCV is more efficient (active scavenging), so I'd keep it if you can. If it's overwhelmed and you don't wish to add a second PCV valve (etc), then do the breathers and ditch the PCV.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Oct 22, 2008
#4
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #4
The nice thing about the PCV is that it runs the corrosive crankcase gasses back through the engine, they get burned, and dumped out with the exhaust (I'm sure you knew that, but I'm just reiterating). A breather just leaves them to hang around in your engine bay, and eventually deposits or drips form around and under the breather. The breather looks cool, but the PCV system works better and actually cleaner in the long run. That and, like stated above, the PCV system sort of "sucks" the gasses out of the crankcase, where a breather just lets them float out as they come, which can theoretically shorten the life of your oil.

That being said, there is nothing wrong with a breather, a PCV system is just a nicer option.
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Oct 22, 2008
#5
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #5
I've been wrestling with the same issue on my own lately. I bought it recently and the previous owner did the build.

It has the full stock PCV system still in place, but the passenger valve cover has a breather instead of being connected to the TB like the stock system. Seems to run ok like this. Still trying to research and decide if I should just leave it this way or somehow rig up a system similar to the stock system with the oil filler neck and tube going to the TB. My current valve covers do not have the filler neck.

I'd say to run a PCV setup if you can as well.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Oct 22, 2008
#6
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #6
DocG2828 said:
I've been wrestling with the same issue on my own lately. I bought it recently and the previous owner did the build.

It has the full stock PCV system still in place, but the passenger valve cover has a breather instead of being connected to the TB like the stock system. Seems to run ok like this. Still trying to research and decide if I should just leave it this way or somehow rig up a system similar to the stock system with the oil filler neck and tube going to the TB. My current valve covers do not have the filler neck.

I'd say to run a PCV setup if you can as well.
Click to expand...

I'd say you should get the right valve covers and run the system as it is designed to be run. Just make sure what ever valve covers you get clear your roller rockers. Although, I wonder if you'd be able to adapt this.
Trick Flow® Billet Oil Fill Kits: TFS-51400800 - trickflow.com
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Oct 22, 2008
#7
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #7
Probably could. I've looked into something like this as well...but can't tell if that is a PCV valve in there or not. The last thing I want is that opening to be a one way opening since my understanding of the crank ventilation is that it relies on that opening to be capable of two way air flow. Obviously something baffled would be nice to slow down oil splash.

 

Attachments

  • 3434110ERL.webp
    53.9 KB · Views: 266

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Oct 22, 2008
#8
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #8
That certainly looks like it has some kind of check valve in it.
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Oct 22, 2008
#9
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #9
strtrcr50 said:
That certainly looks like it has some kind of check valve in it.
Click to expand...


Yeah that pic is actually from a motorcycle parts site....but I know I've seen similar ones with the hose nipple on them.

This seems to be a recurring topic though around these parts.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Oct 22, 2008
#10
  • Oct 22, 2008
  • #10
It gets even more fun if you have a blower..
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Oct 23, 2008
#11
  • Oct 23, 2008
  • #11
My car leaks oil really bad out of the PCV/oil fill grommets on the valve covers. Anyone know why? I'm thinking of trying out a second PCV on the oil fill side?
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Oct 23, 2008
#12
  • Oct 23, 2008
  • #12
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
My car leaks oil really bad out of the PCV/oil fill grommets on the valve covers. Anyone know why? I'm thinking of trying out a second PCV on the oil fill side?
Click to expand...



Are the grommets any good? When I bought mine it was leaking pretty bad there too. The grommet on the breather was pretty chewed up. Popped in a replacement and it stopped.

Do you have any baffles under the valve covers?

From what I've read so far, I'd think you'd want to add another PCV on the drivers side, not the oil fill side. That side is generally thought to need the air to flow in both directions which will not happen with a PCV. Of course, I could be completely off base here.

The Tech Sticky up top has that good writeup on adding a second PCV valve if you so decide.
 

riceslayer302

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
0
1
0
CT
Oct 28, 2008
#13
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #13
i think i have fixed the problem, i just ordered a steeda oil seperator kit for an 03-04 cobra and i will put that on with the pcv, see how that works
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Oct 28, 2008
#14
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #14
riceslayer302 said:
i think i have fixed the problem, i just ordered a steeda oil seperator kit for an 03-04 cobra and i will put that on with the pcv, see how that works
Click to expand...

could have just got one from home depot for like $10 instead of the $40-$50 steeda wants.
 
B

bentley429

Banned
Nov 25, 2004
528
3
0
Connecticut
Oct 28, 2008
#15
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #15
Dang yo should have asked me. 91 is right pretty cheap at homo depot but a -10 AN line to a catch can is the way to go imo.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Oct 28, 2008
#16
  • Oct 28, 2008
  • #16
Sam,
The separator is a step in the right direction, but it won't FIX the problem.

It will help determine if the oil really is entering the intake via the pcv though. And it will help quantify how much oil is being pulled into the intake......


Let me know what you get worked out man,
jason
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Oct 29, 2008
#17
  • Oct 29, 2008
  • #17
i'm going to use the stock system on mine also. but i bought the trick flow EFI intake so where do i get the screen at the rear of the lower intake or what is it called when i hit the parts store. peace


john
 

riceslayer302

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
0
1
0
CT
Oct 29, 2008
#18
  • Oct 29, 2008
  • #18
1991vert said:
could have just got one from home depot for like $10 instead of the $40-$50 steeda wants.
Click to expand...

dang yo lol, well maybe steeda will send me a sticker with my purchase... thatd make it worth the extra 30 bucks... lol not

bentley429 said:
Dang yo should have asked me. 91 is right pretty cheap at homo depot but a -10 AN line to a catch can is the way to go imo.
Click to expand...

here i was thinking i was being smart haha.

vristang said:
Sam,
The separator is a step in the right direction, but it won't FIX the problem.

It will help determine if the oil really is entering the intake via the pcv though. And it will help quantify how much oil is being pulled into the intake......


Let me know what you get worked out man,
jason
Click to expand...

jason, i think i should be ok, i havent run the engine yet im just trying to stop the problem before i have it. i think its only a serious problem with FI cars but we'll see...

i'll keep everyone updated in here or my insanity (progress) thread
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Oct 29, 2008
#19
  • Oct 29, 2008
  • #19
riceslayer302 said:
jason, i think i should be ok, i havent run the engine yet im just trying to stop the problem before i have it. i think its only a serious problem with FI cars but we'll see...

i'll keep everyone updated in here or my insanity (progress) thread
Click to expand...
It isn't only forced induction.... and it should only be forced induction if the pcv system is setup WRONG.
That is why I have a thread on setting up a second pcv in the 'tech thread index' for a n/a stroker engine.............

If you haven't run the motor yet... I wouldn't worry too much.
Send the separator back...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine LOSS OF POWER AT 4,000 RPM.
  • Jarhead67
  • Nov 17, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
B
DFW Area Engine Builder Recomendations?
  • BrewsterGT
  • Jul 2, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2022
bird_dog0347
B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
Engine '88 GT Has No Power Above 3000 RPM After Trick Flow 11r Heads Install
  • JRerecich
  • Feb 12, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 23, 2020
tinker451
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?